Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 5° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Joan Smith: Vicious criticism of Hillary could deter future candidates

Sunday, 8 June 2008

She has had to endure months of sniping, mostly in the form of spiteful personal remarks. They said she was too old, not up to it, and some of the attacks were so vicious that they made her cry. In the end, though, Carrie Bradshaw triumphed over Indiana Jones, with the movie version of Sex and the City taking an impressive £2.1m in British cinemas on its first day.

So much for the film critic who suggested that all four main characters were "getting on a bit" – especially 50-year-old Samantha – and compared Sarah Jessica Parker to a "skeletal transvestite". Women don't like that kind of stuff and, contrary to popular opinion, we're intensely loyal to our heroines. Cinemas are still packed with SATC fans, cheering on 40-something Carrie and her friends.

Sadly, the story hasn't ended so well for Hillary Clinton, who yesterday announced the end of her attempt to become the first credible female candidate for the American Presidency. The problem for her victorious rival, Barack Obama, is that Clinton's supporters include millions of middle-aged and older women who hate seeing a successful woman vilified. They watched in disbelief as their candidate was written off before the primary season had even started; they are still seething over a campaign which wrongly suggested that she was trailing far behind Obama and had no right to be in the contest.

It took Obama five months to get the delegates and super-delegates he needed to defeat her, and last week's count showed how close it was: he won 2,158 to Clinton's 1,926. Arguments have raged about the popular vote but it's clear that both candidates got more than 17 million, which hardly supports the idea that Clinton was a hopeless outsider. On the contrary, it's amazing that she did so well, considering the depths to which some of her opponents stooped. I've never been a fan of either of the Clintons, but I'm saddened by the ferocity of the attacks on the first woman in the history of the US with a real chance of becoming President. It's fair enough to criticise her policies and her record, but that isn't what they focused on, a fact symbolised for me by the notorious nutcracker in the shape of her body. Her stainless steel thighs crack the toughest nuts, geddit?

The "Hillary is a bitch" campaign has revealed a rabid strain of misogyny; like anti-Semitism, it is visceral and illogical. I've criticised Hillary Clinton for putting her political career on hold while her husband ran for office, but I can't see another woman in American politics who has put in the hard work and has sufficient support to run for President. I wouldn't be surprised if a generation of younger female politicians are asking themselves whether they could take as much heat.

It's telling that the Democrats have gone for an unknown quantity, a man long on rhetoric but short on policy, rather than a woman; even if Obama beats John McCain in November, the last few months have been hugely damaging for the entire political process. Even in the Democratic Party, women are still supposed to marry Mr Big, not go after the top job themselves.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

17 Comments

Don't quite know how we got so far off topic, Kumbayah. Thought I'd finish this on a lighter note: the gender equality in the Nordic countries accounts for the famed open mindedness in other areas ;) , and may explain why Icelandic men are top of the longevity league tables (despite an appalling diet) whilst we women languish in mere third place.

Posted by Stef | 11.06.08, 13:47 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Stef - but nordic countries are little countries, without empires and were not utterly bankrupted by 2 massive 20th century wars (the UK only stopped paying back a loan from the uSA last year).
You pay massive taxes - and have massive natural resources too - and will soon have to face that.
Democracy? Rubbish! In the 'Nordic countries' you cannot understand the concept of the individual - you vote for the government and accept their will and actions - even sterlising children whose parents were 'undesirable' (drunk, nazi etc) (until the late 70s!!!) and legalising child porn!
Education? Very dull and uninspiring in nordic countries - so people have no imagination or individuality IMHO.
Standard of living? Good, due to natural resources, lots of space, free energy etc and the lack of a large industrialied soiety to transform into a service economy or war debts.
Don't be so smug Stef - the 'nordic' countries are in serious trouble economically. 'Gender equality' = sexism against men?

Posted by Kumbayah | 10.06.08, 09:08 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

It hardly ups her feminist credentials when a lot of the "experience" she claims to have comes from being married to the right guy and therefore spending time in the White House.
I'm female and I wouldn't have voted for her

Posted by LS | 09.06.08, 17:52 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Oh dear. Don't really want to go off topic, but feel I must defend the Nordic countries from Kumbyah. Being a Nordic, I am of course a tad biased - but all the international league tables speak for themselves. Longevity, gender equality, wealth distribution, standard of living, education, democracy - you will find the Nordic countries fighting for first place.
Back on topic. I did not realise how nasty, for lack of a better word, the Uk press was to Hillary's campaign until I read two articles - one Icelandic and one in The Times on exactly the same topic. The difference was startling and after that I started watching out for the bias, of which there was plenty.
Even though one does not like Hillary personally, one should demand unbiased reporting, in order to judge for oneself. I think the reason so many older women voted for Clinton, was that they know this sort of intrinsic sexism first hand. What did John Lennon sing?
Let's just wait and see what happens with Mrs Obama.

Posted by Stef | 09.06.08, 12:56 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Give me a break! Hillary was the establishment candidate and the nomination was hers to lose. Less than a year ago she had a 30 point lead over her nearest rival; she had name recognition; and she had the best "brand" in Democratic politics. She squandered it all with a poorly run campaign. It's premature to say that the attacks on Hillary will deter other female candidates from seeking higher office, as she is not and never was a "typical" female candidate. People really like to gloss over the fact that she and Bill are two of the most polarizing political figures in American politics. What happened to Hillary had everything to do with her, and nothing to do with sexism.

No one has produced one shred of evidence that she lost votes because of sexism. On the other hand, there is ample evidence to show that Barack lost votes because working class whites don't want to vote for a Black candidate.

Posted by Kay Pleasant | 09.06.08, 05:50 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

so apart from the nutcrackers, where is the evidence?

Posted by mark | 08.06.08, 21:25 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Pass the sick bucket pul-eez! Hilary Clinton was a disgrace and were it not for the fact that she was a woman married to a former president she would not even have been in the race! How sexist is that?
Her campaign was a disgrace from the mis-spoke(lies) to the assassination gaffe and including the hard working white americans quote(racist? elitist?)- Nobody did these to her except herself.So whose in her camp? Racists and demented feminists all looking for a cause! I was rather ambivalent to her originally but her brand of divisive, hate filled politics tells me that America and the world are beter off without her anywhere near the seat of power. America will one day have a Female President but hopefully not her! Condaleeza Rice anyone?

Posted by Mister Jay | 08.06.08, 18:07 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I think it's funny that the democratic party - the party that is supposed to stand for civil rights is the same party that has DENIED 2 ENTIRE STATES (MI & FL) THEIR VOTES.

Obama has racist and down right unamerican ties. And if you count overseas donations etc...to the Hillary camp then they both do.

Hillary is exactly the same type politician that we fought so hard in the 60s to get away from. I hope her career is shattered.

On the other hand, John McCain spent 5 yrs in a prison camp in Vietnam and came back inspired to work for the cause of democracy....a very fine human being who can work both sides of the isle. I'm sorry, but given the choices, the only thing McCain seems to have against him is the fact that he is a Republican...I'm willing to overlook that. The choice seems obvious.

So Joan, don't have too much fun at your panty party.

Posted by Jackson | 08.06.08, 17:42 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Hillary Clinton's campaign is no blueprint for the average Jane - she is unpopular in her own right. Her surprising loss to an unknown has far more to do with her campaign's lack of planning and sense of entitlement than with her gender. After she was beaten into third place in Iowa, in palpable shock she tried to be all things to all people. At a time when Americans appear tired of the same old, same old, the formidable Clinton political machine came unstuck. Her attacks on Obama's character and playing to the lowest political myths, remember the photo of Obama in 'muslim-looking' tribal dress, made her look demeaning and desperate. These things have nothing whatever to do with being a woman.

Hillary Clinton encountered sexism, but this is not the chief reason for her demise. She was scuppered because Bush II made Clinton II look like an impending disaster, and Bill Clinton went from hero to zero in 0.2 seconds. HRC should learn the lesson and run again in 2012.

Posted by JamericanPrincess | 08.06.08, 17:36 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

'Sexosm is rife and an intrinsic part of anglo saxon culture' is it Stef? What, unlike islamic culture from which obama springs? People are just as critical about men but in different ways - calling them wimps or weak, for example. YOu like the Nordic countries? What, like Sweden, which chickened out in the war and was sterilising children until the late 1970s if their parents did not fit their socialist utopian model and at the same time legalising child porn? Face it - Hillary is an irritating nag so lost and she used her gender and her husband to try and get the job in the first place. Try not to be so sexist and look at the person not the gender. Although I do agree that, because of multicultural political correctness that infects the media, the UK press and TV has wrongly been supportiung obama just for being 'black' (but then they supported hillary for just being female before that!) - patronising racist evidence of our media's decline. McCain will now win easily.

Posted by Kumbayah | 08.06.08, 13:17 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

17 Comments

Columnist Comments

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: The greasy gravy train of lobbyism

The idiocy and graft at work in the system barely merits a second glance.

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: When 'life' should mean life.

Sometimes the public feel the perpetrator should not be released.

steve_richards

Steve Richards: Who is accountable for the police?

Why was Damian Green arrested with such spectacular insensitivity?