Johann Hari: The shameless scam of restaurant tips
When you pay a £2 service charge at a Holiday Inn, £1.50 is pocketed by the company
Monday, 9 June 2008
Once upon a time, I was the world's worst waiter. There is one shift I still rerun in my stress-dreams; I managed to tip a roast duck down a woman's cleavage and serve a toddler neat vodka. It all ended when I had a row about immigration with a customer – he was ranting to his table about "the Pakis" – and I served his lemon sole in mushroom sauce into his lap. I did not receive many tips.
But if I had, they would have been mine, to take home and spend. Today – thanks to a loophole in Britain's employment rules – that is no longer the case. When you leave a tip for a waiter, many restaurants are pocketing the cash for themselves. And – worse still – they are using them as an excuse to legally pay less than the minimum wage. The story of how this came to pass tells us a lot about how poorly we are protected in the workplace.
This tipping scam began with the introduction of the chip-and-pin system in 2004. Up to that moment, tips were left in cash, on the table. The waiters picked them up and pocketed them; end of story. But with this new system, more than half of all tips are now paid by credit card. When we do this, most of us imagine this is totted up at the end of the night and handed to the waiting waiting staff. We are wrong.
Legally, this money is the property of the employer. They can do whatever they want with it – and many add it to their profits. When you pay a £2 service charge at a Holiday Inn, £1.50 is pocketed by the company. The staff scrambles for the remaining 50p.
Many British restaurants go even further. If glasses or plates are broken – as they inevitably are when you're rushing around juggling food at 11pm on a Saturday – the cost is taken from tips. If a customer runs off without paying, that is taken from tips too.
But there is a bigger con still. We think of the tips we leave as a bonus on top of a waiter's wages. But many of Britain's most lucrative restaurant chains – including Café Rouge and Carluccio's – pay less than the minimum wage, and claim the plundered tips raise the waiter's income to the legal minimum. Despite raking in £4.8m in pure profit last year, Carluccio's pay their waiters £1.60 below the mandatory £5.52 for those aged 22 and over.
Oh, and take this with your bread basket: several companies sack the staff who try to keep the tips intended for them. Pizza Express pockets an 8 per cent "admin charge" on all tips given by chip-and-pin. When their 20- year-old staff member Nabil Guirguis started informing customers about this, and said he would prefer a cash tip, they fired him. (They claim he was "misleading" customers.)
Staff at the Restaurant Group – which owns Garfunkels, Chiquito and more – only last week told staff they too will be sacked if they encourage a cash tip.
My friend Miloscz, who works as a waiter, says: "When you are working 14-hour shifts for less than a fiver an hour, the last thing you need is your boss snatching away money the customer thinks he was giving to you. It drives you mad when at the end of the night your feet are killing you and you see 20 quid taken out of your tips to pay for some bastard who didn't pay, or 'admin', or a broken plate."
The trade union Unite has been calling for Gordon Brown to change the law to make this illegal. The minimum wage should do what it says on the tin – act as a legally enforced minimum – with all tips on top, and they should be the full property of the waiting staff.
But this is only the first sliver of the programme we need now. The Labour government's greatest achievement – the minimum wage legislation – needs to be tightened. Today, if you fail to pay the minimum wage, you are taking almost no risk at all. The odds of being caught are tiny: at the current rate of inspection, you will be checked once every 330 years. (All your waiters will be dead by then.)
And if you are caught underpaying, what happens? Some 95 per cent of criminal bosses are simply required to pay the backlog. Imagine if 95 per cent of burglars were merely required to give back what they had stolen, and you get some idea of how powerful the deterrent effect is.
Of the tiny fraction who are both caught and punished, the maximum possible fine is £5,000. By contrast, if you fake the Nike or Adidas logo and print it on clothing, you face up to seven years in jail. Rip off the rich and we'll hammer you; rip off the poor and you're asked politely not to do it again.
There are some signs the Government is beginning to see that strengthening basic protections in the workplace could be a vote-winner against the regulation-bashing David Cameron. The Tory leader and his coterie opposed the minimum wage vehemently, but they now realise it is too popular to abolish – so they will whittle it down with below-inflation increases and even-fewer inspections (once every 500 years?).
That's what George Bush did across the Atlantic – and Shadow Chancellor Gideon "George" Osborne notes dryly: "We have a lot to learn from Bush's compassionate conservatism."
This would only be the first step in undermining our already weak protections. Cameron says it will be a "top priority" to withdraw from the European Social Chapter – even though this would abolish rights to four weeks of paid holidays for 10 million part-time workers.
If Labour loudly pursued the opposite path – calling for our workplaces to be more human and humane – this could be a strong populist cry. The beginnings of a package are in sight: Business and Employment Secretary John Hutton has just announced he will double the number of minimum wage inspectors (once every 165 years?), and launch a crackdown in catering, where abuses are worst.
In one of his best decisions since he became Prime Minister, Gordon Brown has announced that our two million agency workers will be legally granted equal rights.
If this is rolled into an electoral parcel with a hike in the minimum wage and the Unite proposals for fair tips, it would be good politics as well as good policy. Brown could offer the electorate the choice: do you want to live in a Labour country where your workplace is regulated and respectful, or in a Tory deregulatopia where even the tips you leave can be snatched from the harried hands of your sub-minimum wage waiters?
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
26 Comments
Mr Hari what do you think about the plans the US has for Iraq. After all you did support the ILLEGAL invasion and murder.
Posted by Serosch | 12.06.08, 12:37 GMT
Greetings!
I am Amazed and flabbergasted reading this story!
That in a country ruled by Labor (Socialists), such a scandalous
organized racket is allowed flourish? This must be, wha we are told is the new Labor, invented by Blair?
Your PM, The Honorable Brown, is too busy with the war on terror, so I doubt he will find the time to close the loophole in the law, which allows this criminal activity!
Sincerely
Krapotkin
Kingwood, Texas
Posted by Krapotkin | 11.06.08, 03:15 GMT
I don't think I've ever read an article that deems the plight of waiters/waitresses a serious issue...so to read one is great. I have worked in several big name restaurants in London, and in all the restaurants I have worked in, the only restaurant that allowed you to keep all your tips was Porters English Restuarant-this may have changed in recent years, but as is usually the case - it seems that the bigger the restaurant, the more money grabbing...
Posted by HDP | 10.06.08, 23:51 GMT
I agree with anonymous, I have always tipped, believing that the staff get the tips. I won't be tipping again.
Posted by Anginsan | 10.06.08, 10:54 GMT
Yes Des Troy - and Capitalism very much likes to pay people peanuts where it can get away with it. I always tip if I've had good service and I just hope it goes to the waiter/ess. As it damn well should do - that's why I left the tip.
Posted by Riley Wain | 10.06.08, 10:51 GMT
For years I have been bemused by the whole tipping scam. It doesn't make any sense economically. It's begging in a disguised form. People should just pay the price of the meal - that's how capitalism works.
Posted by Des Troy | 10.06.08, 09:50 GMT
I would like to suggest that we get rid of tips (as a person should be paid for their job based on what the overall business can afford) and that we get rid of all the issues with the WONDERFUL minimum wage* by replacing it with a MAXIMUM WAGE DIFFERENTIAL. That would mean that everyone who works at a business (whether they are core staff or contract cleaners) can not earn less than a proportion of the top man's salary; thereby, if he wants a pay rise, everyone else must get one too.
In Japan the difference between the earnings of rich and poor is minimal, and they benefit from related low criminality.
*REMEMBER the tories opposed it.
Posted by Chrissy | 10.06.08, 09:49 GMT
thank you for this note, excellente because there is too much abuse for this big groups, I hope one day is going to chance.
Miky
Posted by miky | 10.06.08, 01:10 GMT
Here in France its only the British who tip. Everybody else understands the system. What a relief to pay your bill for
food and drink only. Don't insult the waiter, they are getting a fair wage.
Posted by oscar katz | 09.06.08, 22:55 GMT
This seems a common trait amongst restaurant owners. An italian restaurant close to my house not only takes the tips for its own, but avoids tax through paying its staff in cash each week. I'm sure the government would be a lot quicker with legal action when hearing of the 2nd theft the company is commiting.
Posted by Matt | 09.06.08, 20:46 GMT
26 Comments