Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 3° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Johann Hari: When two sides of Islam go head to head

Monday, 23 June 2008

As a country, we can spend countless hours discussing rival teams of men kicking a piece of plastic into a net. But we are all supposed to be shame-faced about discussing the fantastically complex dramas called Reality TV. Well, I'm not.

Have the sinews of racism and snobbery been more truthfully traced than in the showdown between Shilpa Shetty and Jade Goody? Has the reality of sexism in the workplace been laid out more rivettingly than in Alan Sugar's annual picking of amiable, malleable men over competent, dynamic women to be his apprentice? Now this glorious genre has dramatised the clash within British Islam – between secularisers and fanatics – with the same concision.

Reality TV has long shown a face of British Islam that contrasts with the murderous smirk of the Tube-bomber Mohammed Sidiq Khan. It gave us Chico Slimani, the buff, rippling ex-Chippendale who blagged his way through The X-Factor; Kemal Shahin, the smart, tart young gay man who dominated Big Brother 5; and Saira Khan, the feminist entrepreneur from The Apprentice who refuses to let her religion be hijacked by "bearded old men from the Middle East". They represent the first fragile shoots of a secularised Islam that – like most Christianity and Judaism in Europe – can be shrunk until it is a matter of custom and private conscience.

But on our reality TV shows, this has always been a one-sided fight. Fundamentalists, by their you're-all-damned nature, are not inclined to take part in reality TV. Until now.

If you were told the biographies of Big Brother contestants Mohamed Mohamed and Alex De-Gale, you wouldn't find it hard to guess which one is the fundamentalist. Mohamed was born in Somalia in 1985. When he was five years old, he saw his mother being held at gunpoint, and thought she was going to die. Since then, he has spent most of his life fleeing from one civil war to another – until, finally, he was granted asylum in Britain. De-Gale was born in the same year in south London, to black British parents. She is now a lithe accounts executive with high cheekbones, short skirts, a BMW, and a seven-year old daughter she brings up on her own.

You guessed wrong. They wouldn't use these terms, but Mohamed became a convinced secularist on the run from Somalia, while Alex learned a Wahhabbi interpretation of Islam on the streets of Tottenham. This emerged, as everything does on Big Brother, through a thicket of trivia. Mohamed's birthday fell a week into his stay in the Big Brother house, so the producers threw him a party, and let him pick the theme. Remembering a fun night he'd had at university, he said he wanted the male housemates to dress as women, and vice versa. Everyone cheered and howled for alcohol.

Except Alex. "First and foremost," she said, "I am a Muslim." And that meant the idea of a man dressing as a woman "made me feel sick". Jabbing her finger and shouting, she said to Mohamed: "Tell it to Allah [that] it's all in the name of fun. It's bad enough that we drink and smoke ... You're supposed to be a Muslim man, someone I can look up to for guidance. You will have my friends and family in uproar. I am disgraced by you ... 85 per cent of the people I know are Muslims. And trust me – the sheer horror they would have experienced ... [You have] disgraced Islam."

"You can't tell me I'm a bad Muslim," Mohamed replied. "I am old enough to be responsible for myself. Don't bring religion into it!" She snapped back: "It is! There's nothing else!" Alex was so enraged she announced she has "gangster friends" and, if she was evicted, "I get to go out [and] see everyone's friends, I get to see their family. I get to do the shit that I wanna do. Pow, pow, pow." This threat wasn't necessarily idle: Alex has a restraining order against her after she waged a "hate campaign" against a former friend.

In that little exchange, you see the contrast between two understandings of Islam. I live in the middle of the Muslim East End, and I see this raw, rubbing conflict being played out every day.

Alex believes that Islam offers Absolute Judgements, immutably cast in stone in the Koran. These are (of course) hellishly patriarchal, since they were formulated by illiterate desert merchants in the seventh century AD. She has been taught there is "nothing else". Later, she explained to another housemate that Islam forbids drinking and smoking. "What can you do then?" he asked. "Pray." That's all. If you see somebody acting in a way your pre-modern system judges to be "sick", is it perfectly moral to threaten to kill them?

Mohamed, by contrast, sees the religion as consisting of metaphors and moral guidance – and he thinks it has limits. There are places it shouldn't go. "She always brings religion into an equation that religion has nothing to do [with]," he said angrily. But what makes this argument even more fascinating – turning it from a scene by George Bernard Shaw into one by David Mamet – is the ambiguities within Alex's character. She howls about the morals of seventh-century Arabia, when they would have her stoned to death. Almost every Islamist I have met has this dissonance running through them. The 9/11 hijackers went to a strip-bar and got drunk before staging their cry for the construction of a Caliphate that would kill them for doing just that. The "moral" vision they believe in is so inhuman even they can't follow it.

So how do we make sure relaxed secularists like Mohamed, Chico, Kemal and Saira beat Alex's wing of Islam? They have answers of their own. They all start with us ceasing to show multicultural politeness towards fanatical theocrats. Saira Khan – who as a teenager was whipped by her father with a coat-hanger for letting her legs show – says we need to call misogyny and gay-bashing by their proper names. Muslims are not a homogenous block represented by the elderly Saudi-trained Mullahs who taught Alex their totalitarian model of Islam.

But we are handing more and more Muslim children over to them to indoctrinate. Faith schools herd the kids of Muslim parents away from the rest of us and pickle them in stale dogmas. Khan – who has spoken at many Muslim schools – says they "encourage segregation and women to be submissive". When I called Kemal, he was even more emphatic, saying: "I would have died in one of these Muslim-only faith schools." There, the Alexes can mass and shout down the Mohameds with the backing of their teachers. (Our oil-addicted foreign policy makes it easier to tell them the democratic society outside is evil.) Yet the Government is not dismantling faith schools – it is building more of them.

So watch that row between Mohamed and Alex again. It is a shouting match – "This is nothing to do with religion!" "Tell it to Allah!" – playing out in a million variations in souqs and madrassahs and Muslim homes across the world. Now that's what I call reality television.

j.hari@independent.co.uk

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

43 Comments

Funny, when religious people are fanatical, "Secularists" blame religion but when most religious people behave fairly well it is dismissed. When "Secularists" are nutters, they are just nutters and should be dismissed. Double standard?

If religious nuts want everyone to convert to their religion it is horrific but it's "reasonable" for you to come right out and state that we need to get rid of religion. Which is to say, you think your belief system, Atheism, ought to be imposed on everyone. You're more like those "nutters" than you care to believe. It's called supercessionism.

What makes you think we will behave better without religion? Have you read academic postings? "Reasonable" people insulting and threatening each other over scientific theories! We will just fight about whose Atheism is correct doctrine. Religion has no monopoly on frail-ego fundamentalists.

At least for once we won't be pretending the god we worship isn't in our own image.

Posted by Karen | 29.06.08, 08:32 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

A Rabbi once commented, "You know, the most difficult thing about Judaism is the Jews" He could've been referring to any religion. The major problem with every religion is that it's full of and run by fallible human beings. Ditto for politics, and every other group endeavor.

The problem with religious fanatics is they think everybody except themselves should be morally accountable, and the problem with people who call themselves secular but really belong to the religion Atheism [and it IS a religion with it's own fanatics] is that they think nobody should be morally accountable at all.

I would like to see Secularism returned to it's original meaning of building a society where no one religion gets to trample on the rights of those who believe differently. I'd also love a world where people actually knew something about the religions they comment on or write articles about

All the religions started out good for women and then lesser men get in charge and deprive them of rights.

Posted by Karen | 29.06.08, 06:42 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

John you are so ignorant. That’s the problem with western writers putting their views and ideas on things they do not understand.

How is Mohamed a secularist, has he said he is? For your information, the Civil War in Somalia were started by your cherished secularism .

The Said Baire government believed in socialism and communism (when they needed USSR help). Most of these warlords are from this very same government. The ironic thing is that the Islamic Court Union were the ones to bring some emblance of peace to southern Somalia, which has not been seen in 20 years. However, the USA acted before actually assessing (something you are prone to do) blindly supported the warlords, that are so hated by the Somalis.

In addition, Alexandra is not a Whabbist (sic) , as she does not even follow the basic tenent of Islam. She was attacking Mohamed because she did not like him and used religion as a weapon.

Therefore, research before talking utter nonsense.

Posted by Bulale | 28.06.08, 15:33 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Excellent article!

Posted by Bobby | 25.06.08, 19:30 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Mark, you've got the 'my gang, your gang' mentality of the playground. What you're saying is: When you've got enough people in your gang to make you feel big, you'll go out and get all the people in the other gang.

Faith is an individual, spiritual path of growth. It is not about how many people you can get on your side. It is not about intimidation. It is not about harming those who don't or can't feel the same.

So when you've got your dominance, what do you intend to do to those of other religions or atheists? Is it:

A. Leave them to live in peace and to choose how to live their own lives?

Or is it

B. Kill the infidels?

No prizes for guessing.

Posted by Angie | 25.06.08, 09:15 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Mark could not be more wrong but I hope he continues to spout his particular invective because it just helps expose religion as the nutty, vicious & hate filled rant that it is. In my experience the louder the voice the more the shouter is trying to convince him or herself that what they are saying is true. When religions say we are kind & peace loving & just want to help others you are seeing the advert. The psychological harm (with genital mutilation the physical harm) that is done by telling children that unless they believe they & mommy & daddy will burn in eternity forever comes later. This is ritualised child abuse that turns out the monsters that act as its mouthpieces & martyrs. However the reason that after 100's of years of murder in their gods name they still have to rant is that people see it as supernatural BS.

Independent surveys show that the fastest growing belief is no belief and given freedom to think people leave religion especially Islam in droves.

Posted by Bill Green | 25.06.08, 08:31 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Johann you are pathetic. In that small head of yours there is only radical terrorist on one side, and a secularist who has given up half of Islam's beliefs on the other. There is no in-between. Untrue. There are many Muslims who follow the religion devoutly, believe the Quran is religious truth, yet are productive peace-loving and tolerant citizens, do not oppress their wives or daughters, do not go and beat every gay person they see, do not call for the downfall of democracy. Your article and the views espoused therin will undoubtedly offend and upset many moderate Muslims and will give the radicals ammunition to claim the West will never tolerate Islam in its pristine sense, and that the West demand Muslims tone-down their religion for the sake of the West.

Posted by Gareth | 24.06.08, 18:17 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Mark has proved Johann's point. I'm with Mohamed (the BB one) over this nutter every time.

Posted by Petie | 24.06.08, 16:21 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Hey, Mark, you sound so full of hate. If that's what your religion has done for you you can keep it. I don't know about Alex and Mohammed not being good examples of your faith, I find you a complete turn off as an advertisement for it.

Don't worry, I'm not trembling in my shoes.

Posted by Kaye | 24.06.08, 15:32 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Your posting sounds quite threatening, Mark, as no doubt you intended it to be. The implication being that, because people are entering Islam in droves, the rest of us need to be wary. Why is that? Do you intend, once you've got enough thugs and bully boys at your back, to harm those who decline to join you in your self imposed prison?

Don't you see, the very essense of your posting is what most people find wrong with Islam. The threat of what will happen to people who aren't part of your ideaology.

You sound like a convert and they are always the most zealous, whatever the religion.

Posted by Jude | 24.06.08, 15:23 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

43 Comments

Columnist Comments

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: The greasy gravy train of lobbyism

The idiocy and graft at work in the system barely merits a second glance.

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: When 'life' should mean life.

Sometimes the public feel the perpetrator should not be released.

steve_richards

Steve Richards: Who is accountable for the police?

Why was Damian Green arrested with such spectacular insensitivity?