Matthew Norman: Goat-herder Gordon has lost his tribe
Leaders prefer to populate the cabinet farmyard almost exclusively with sheep
As his personal history repeats itself in a loosely Marxist manner – first as military tragedy, now as political farce – the consolation for Admiral Lord West is that he's been here before. When on 21 May 1982 the Argentine navy sank HMS Ardent, of which he was commanding officer, he was the heroic last man to leave the sinking ship.
Now it's déjà vu for the plain speaking old sea dog. With Lord Darzi joining the other political ingénues in scurrying overboard as the Good Ship Gordon glug-glug-glugs towards the oceanic shelf, Alan West finds himself in the familiar position of last man on deck.
Who would have believed it when, just a couple of years ago, Gordon Brown announced his candidacy for the leadership of party and country? "The task ahead is to build an even stronger economy with even higher standards of living," he winsomely assured us (as Alan Bennett once put it: "winsome, lose some").
"I will reach out to put national interest before sectional interest, and I will form a government of all the talents." Hurrah for that.
And so were born the "goats", acronymic offspring of Gordon's fabled passion for eschewing the narrow and factional in favour of the broad and inclusive. Into his big tent, or circus, came a quartet of experts. Clad in ermine and tethered to their red boxes along with West were Digby Jones, the former CBI boss, as trade minister; Mark Malloch-Brown, erstwhile UN Deputy Secretary-General, as one of Banana Boy Miliband's Foreign Office juniors; and Ari Darzi, the Iraqi-born world-renowned heart surgeon, at health.
Big-tent politics is a splendid thing in theory. But the reason the Millennium Dome was such a clumpingly-gorgeous New Labour allegory, as Andrew Marr and others have pointed out, is that it was a very, very big tent indeed with barely a thing of substance inside it.
This seems to have come as as a shock to the "goats", who imagined, bless 'em, that they'd been hired to deploy their knowledge and experience in the cause of the positive change Gordon had promised. Soon enough it dawned on them that they were expected to be regimental "goats" ... mascots for a retreating political army with a purely decorative role.
Gordon, meanwhile, made an unwelcome discovery of his own. The thing about "goats" is that they are not, by nature, malleable.
They are known, in fact, for their stubbornness. Capra is the Latin for goat, and they tend towards the capricious. This is why Gordon, like all PMs, prefers to populate the cabinet farmyard almost exclusively with sheep.
In the past, British cabinets have had their "goats" too. The phrase "Government of all the talents" was coined in 1806, when Pitt the Younger died and his successor Lord Grenville formed a government of national unity during war with France. During a later war Churchill brought in Lord Beaverbrook as aviation minister, while Mrs Thatcher needed no martial fig leaf to ennoble David Young and make him secretary of state first for employment and then for trade.
Gordon, on the other hand, had no intention of letting his "goats" stray anywhere near real power, and no desire to hear their expert voices. When, within months of joining the Home Office to speak on security, Lord West told the Today programme he could not see the logic of extending the maximum detention period for terrorist suspects beyond 28 days, he was cordially invited to Downing Street for a chat. An hour after his radio declaration, his lordship saw the light and recanted. He has been a most sheepish little goat ever since.
The others have been truer to their breed. First to leave the pen, last autumn, was Lord Jones. Lord Malloch-Brown – not a character suited to taking orders from a cocky whippersnapper like Miliband – followed suit last week. Now Lord Darzi, whose NHS report "High Quality Care For All" was warmly received in the way good proposals that will be never be acted upon often are, has had his fill. There's nothing curious about the timing. It's hardly as though there's anything menacing like a pandemic on the loose to highlight the need for top-level medical expertise in the health department.
Even so, coming so hot on Malloch-Brown's heels (if hooves have heels; what is this, Farming Today?), it must be a bit dispiriting for Gordon.
It is not the savage blow hinted at in some reports. In happier times, perhaps it would have been. In his current state, however, the loss of "goats" is to Gordon what an outbreak of piles is to a patient in the palliative stage of a terminal illness. A pain in the bum, certainly, but irrelevant to the prognosis.
In fact, this amusingly failed experiment tells us more about the paradoxical credulity of the extremely clever than about Gordon, of whose preference for artifice over substance we have long been aware. No one seems more vulnerable to transparent schmoozing than the highly intelligent. There haven't been many smarter politicians than Roy Jenkins, yet he succumbed to Mr Blair's cheesy seduction technique, over proportional representation, like a horny spinster serenaded by Julio Iglesias. Jenkins's outsize ego never quite got over it.
If the finest Home Secretary and arguably Chancellor of the last century was so easily intoxicated by the fumes of power given off by one PM, you can't be too hard on Jones, Malloch-Brown and Darzi for falling for another's blandishments that their independence of mind was as valuable as their specialist knowledge.
At least it didn't take them long to work out that they were merely sub-plot devices in a surreal fictional narrative. What Lord West was thinking by staying on after receiving the lash for speaking his mind is another matter. Then again, maybe it's best that he stays to the death as a paradigm of impotence for the benefit of potential "goats" approached by David Cameron.
So let us wish him well as he follows the lead of another Admiral the Lord, Horatio D'Ascoyne from Kind Hearts and Coronets, who maintained his proud salute as his ship went down and the salty water lapped over his face.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited





Comments
The comment of Brown's "preference for artifice over substance" is perfectly correct, but one reason for that is clear. The man has never had the talent.
He's like a bogus tradesman with a customer's order, the equipment to be installed and the tools, but clueless how to go about the job.
Brown's intellect has always been a thing of startlingly outstanding exaggeration. It's not towering, as the myth has developed, but very limited in its breadth and scope. Taking ten years to finalize a PhD thesis on a topic of neither interest or nor value to anyone else is bad enough. To follow it with a book which has been escoriated by Dr David Starkey (as rubbish) is credibility destroying. Can anyone find ten people who have even started reading those works?
But he has been aware of his enormous shortcomings! The cunning planner realized as PM that by effecting a weekly plethora of announcements - by him and his "spin machine", distraction would make him a more difficult target. Just like it was, as Chancellor, by keeping everyone away from Treasury people and information.
Bombast, bullying, threatening and wholesale deception has been his life. He knows himself well, so he concocted the fantasy of his moral compass - the one which soon became degaussed. You know, the one which let him down over "flipping" whilst living in a grace-and-favour home, and his recent bogus claims on increasing public expenditure.
This national leader took the easy course in surrounding himself with ministers of totally inadequate capabilities - former sheet-metal workers and postmen aren't usually regarded as prime, ministerial material, are they? But then, there won't be any rivalry from placemen, will there?
History will judge him a charlatan. A PM - who wouldn't have been able to complete a Dale Carnegie public-speaking course; who couldn't ever answer a question directly, but always oblique and opaque; who consistently quoted statistics with a flagrant disregard for true comparison, and pretending not to be able to differentiate between "nominal" and "real" data.
Worst PM and Chancellor in history? Odds-on!
Well said!, the saying "In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is King". Well far too many of us in this country have been blind to the utter failure of this throughly, incompetent, arrogant, charlatan. The price we will pay in the future for his reckless actions on all subjects, finance, energy, building, industry, the list goes on and is unfortunately far too long. Delay, hotair and inaction will be the epitaph of this PM. His name will become as unlucky as Macbeth so will be know as the 'the Scottish PMs' , don't see why Bliar should not take his share of the blame.
The comment about the Dome being a very big tent indeed with no substance in it is, I think, a good summary of this sad, weak Government. It's time for the British Press to pressurise the Government into calling for an immediate election in the autumn before Brown & Co wreak further havoc, because let us be clear, they are the spiteful party and hate the fact that Mr Cameron will probably be in power next May. They still have the power to do untold, further, damage to the country before they finally depart - hopefully to seek the pittance that is Job Seeker's Allowance!
Red Indians had the same problems. They killed many buffaloes and the Cowboys killed them. They then killed cows, tigers, and elephants. They had the swine flue but no vaccines. There is no money so now they are killing soldiers and small, small children
A THOUGHT FOR TODAY:
Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' Vanity asks the question, 'Is it popular?' But, conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it because one's conscience tells one that it is right. -Martin Luther King, Jr. HE DID NOT MENTION BROWN READ THAT >><<>><<>>
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
The Scots. Wales or is the Wells Irish The Liverpools, The backbiters, the front and the back benchers the whistllers ALL GONE!!!!!!!!All goats !!!!Does he have to use or you have to call us cows and PIGS please
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
GOATS WE
DD day hide hide hide hi hoi de ddes s dead
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla