Nan Goldin: It's ridiculous that we treat child nudity as a problem
Latest in Commentators
Opinion blogs
We need to avoid another ‘lost generation’
A tiny green shoot one day, and then a chill wind the next. Anyone hoping for signs of economic spr...
Circular firing squad at a crossroads
Politico has identified seven dreadful clichés of campaigning in and commenting on the Republican pr...
Reminders of Iraq
I was sorry to learn from Paul Waugh of the death of Brian Jones, the former Defence Intelligence Se...
Perversity is in the eye of the beholder. Children are born without a fear of sexuality or a fear of their own bodies. That fear is imposed on them. Children are sensual beings, they touch and they like to be touched. It's the adult who sometimes takes advantage of this situation.
It's not about what the children in an image are doing and there's nothing sick about a nude child. It's so ridiculous we treat this as a problem in society. It's one of the joys of life, the human body.
My little nephew grew up in Scotland and when he'd visit America with his parents, he'd run around the beach naked and people would be incensed. The more we are around nudity, the more it is demystified and the more we realise that the body is beautiful.
Pornography is another issue altogether. I used to work in Times Square and a lot of the people who worked in a bar there were sex workers who made their money from being in porn magazines. I would say the difference between pornography and art is that (in the first instance), children are abused to act out adult's version of their fantasies. Child abuse is all about power and I am not encouraging anyone to have a relationship with someone under-age.
Last year when I had my exhibition at the Baltic, the assistant director called the police and said there's a piece, here that you might not like. The image was of two little sisters belly-dancing. They decided to belly dance for me, I didn't set anything up. They were acting completely naturally. Afterwards I got a letter from the parents of the girls I photographed to tell me how much they had enjoyed the images.
But even respected publishers are now afraid of using that image in a book of my work because they think it could prevent its US distribution.
Art can't and shouldn't be regulated by the state. Politicians have nothing whatsoever to do with art or artists except to become anonymous collectors if they choose.
Nan Goldin, 54, is an American fine art and documentary photographer based in Paris
- 1 Leading article: Iran risks playing into the hands of its enemies
- 2 Leading article: Superpowers in search of the next world order
- 3 Andreas Whittam Smith: The Greeks have spoken and the eurozone's fate is sealed
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 Steve Richards: Binge-drinking can go the way of smoking
- 6 The Daily Cartoon
- 7 The dark side of Dubai
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 6 MP faces charges over Nazi stag night
- 7 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 8 No secularism please, we're British
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Lightning kills an entire football team
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments