Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 10° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

Rhiannon Harries: 'Addiction's never good for you – even if it is 'good' for you'

Fighting fit: Exercise addict Amy Winehouse

Getty Images

Fighting fit: Exercise addict Amy Winehouse

Every time I leave the gym, tired, horribly dishevelled, but essentially satisfied, I think it is going to happen. This is such a great feeling, I think to myself. Better than anything I get from a cigarette or glass of wine or extra hour in bed. I'm going to remember this post-work-out elation and crave it so powerfully that I will be compelled to come to the gym every day for the rest of my life.

Except I don't. However much I might want it, this exercise addiction won't kick in. Not so for Amy Winehouse, though: "She's in the gym three or four hours a day. I mean, boy, is she fit, really, really fit," blustered the singer's media-friendly dad Mitch to the papers last week. "So that's a really positive addiction."

It's impossible to make a comparison between taking class-A drugs and hitting the treadmill, so it would be unfair to expect her father to see this as anything but a change for the better. But since she's a singer, not a professional athlete, spending a quarter of her waking hours exercising is not normal – nor is describing any kind of addiction as positive.

Albeit unwittingly, Mitch raises a good point, though – addictions and obsessions per se do enjoy an oddly neutral status. It's their object which decides their position in the realms of either good or evil. Compulsive eating, for instance, inspires blanket revulsion. An addiction to drugs or booze wins a mixed bag of disapproval and sympathy with a vague patina of glamour or romance. Meanwhile, obsessively exercising, regulating one's diet or working generally get the green light as normal, even enviable.

The replacement of a dangerous addiction with a less harmful one is a standard trajectory. A friend who was anorexic as a teenager is now a wheat-free, dairy-free, sugar-free kind of girl who freaks out if she doesn't get a couple of hours of yoga in by 8am. The physical danger has been mitigated, but whatever the inner machinations that fuelled her anorexia were, they are still alive and kicking. Yet somehow she is taken by many to be the picture of good health, even though she's only packing 50 per cent of the old mens sana in corpore sano adage.

So next time you hear that a Hollywood star gets up at 4am to go to the gym or allows nothing but seeds and berries to pass their lips, stop fantasising about having similar self-discipline and wish for nothing more than good old-fashioned, middle-of-the-curve moderation.

I, for one, shall be bearing Ms Winehouse herself in mind next time I'm on the treadmill: better not push it too hard; could be a slippery slope...

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Addiction's never good..
[info]ahuntley96 wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 09:11 am (UTC)
In: “On My Mind” (Independent on Sunday 8th November 2009) Rhiannon Harries questions the distinction between socially desirable and undesirable addiction. However there are basic physical reasons why comparison between exercise and drug addition is not quite correct.

To have an effect, Class A drugs and alcohol need to be taken in high and progressively greater amounts. Also the by products are toxic. Addiction can therefore be “physical”.

On the other hand during hard exercise the body produces endorphins. These are much more powerful as opiates than even heroin and produced in much lower quantities. They also break down into harmless chemicals which are easily handled by the body.

For her well being, Amy Whitehouse could do a lot worse than continue going to the gym. However like any activity that becomes obsessive this is more a psychological issue than a physical one.

Columnist Comments

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: Why the British will never love Europe

'The Continent' we called it, knowing we were not of it

mary_dejevsky

Mary Dejevsky: Incentives that work the wrong way

London Metropolitan University is a very far cry indeed from Oxbridge

thomas_sutcliffe

Tom Sutcliffe: Should we pay double to save the bookshop?

A civilized city without bookshops struck me as a contradiction in terms


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion