Commentators

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 13° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Sean O'Grady: We'll be paying for this for decades to come

Forget, if you're not already inclined to do so, the dizzying merry-go-round of billions of pounds circulating between the government and the banks they own. It is bad news – the equivalent of the schools budget being ploughed into keeping the financial system afloat (again).

We will be paying for it, one way or another, for decades. There will be no little box on your tax return or payslip saying "banking bailout levy", but the cost will be felt every time you pay an inflated council tax bill, or you have to wait longer for NHS treatment, or drive on our pot-holed roads. But, in a way, it is just a matter of book-keeping.

As Evan Davis devastatingly pointed out to Alistair Darling on the BBC's Today programme yesterday, if the banks get into more trouble, then any "penalties" they pay to the government or any vast new losses they incur will be mostly paid for by the Government anyway.

What's done is done; Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group have amassed vast quantities of bad debts, and the Government – taxpayers – are responsible for them.

We're lumbered with them, and have been since they were semi-nationalised last year. Then, as now, they have got us over a barrel; pay up or see the banking system melt down. Tails the banks win – heads the taxpayer loses. After all, they're too big to fail, aren't they?

It is irritating. The Government has acted to stop those famously obscene bonuses being paid out in "our banks", but that seems only of limited use when the likes of Goldman Sachs have earmarked £10bn for their staff. The Treasury knows this, and that it cannot compete with Goldmans when it has to answer to unsympathetic voters.

It is a mess, and the Chancellor wants out of the banking game, and as soon as possible. How to do it? Get the healthy bits back into the private sector.

The break-up of Lloyds and RBS – bringing back the old Williams and Glyn's Bank or the Cheltenham and Gloucester as a start – are more to do with EU pressure, but these new banks should be more willing to give you a mortgage or a small business a loan than their loss making state-owned ex-parents. They will raise some money, but none of this is much of a deal for the taxpayer. Then again, it was never going to be.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Corrections
[info]pete_s wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 07:45 am (UTC)

"then any "penalties" they pay to the government or any vast new losses they incur will be mostly paid for by the Government anyway." NO- the Taxpayer pays, the gov does not own a single penny.

"It is a mess, and the Chancellor wants out of the banking game, and as soon as possible. How to do it? Get the healthy bits back into the private sector." Shame you don't mention the imbecile who got us into the banking game in the first place, and the liabilities of the toxic debts the Taxpayer has been left with.

[info]rozr wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 04:55 pm (UTC)
But will committed Labour voters ever learn? When has a Labour govt ever ended in anything but total chaos facing a furious public tricked once again into having believed Labour could manage a country.

If Labour wins power again next year, we might as well all emigrate if we didn't vote Labour. All the bad things Labour have done will in their view be vindicated - removing our liberties, squandering our money, letting MPs live like plutocrats, letting Banks and quangoes and councils pay themselves fortunes, shoehorning us into another EU game to take away our indepenence, backing illegal wars......... All this, getting worse, and you'll be taxed even more than Labour tax now for far less than you've ever had before out of Labour..
Sean Vanity
[info]seanvanity wrote:
Thursday, 5 November 2009 at 08:54 pm (UTC)
Hey - Hey - Hey!!!
There is only one.. internationally famous Sean.. and it ain't O'Grady!
its Sean Vanity!
http://www.SeanVanity.Com
http://www.HugePolitics.com
#1 ranked political satire network in the free speaking western world and.. ranked #1 in UK!

Columnist Comments

bruce_anderson

Bruce Anderson: Iraq is inseparable from Tony Blair

The destruction of Saddam was a noble cause, even if ineptly conducted

yasmin_alibhai_brown

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: Why is my gender in retreat?

The truth is that all nations would prefer it if women went back indoors

philip_hensher

Philip Hensher: Gaffes that can be a boon to Cameron

The expenses scandal too will be seen as a helpful winnowing exercise


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion