Commentators

Rain (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

The Sketch: Sharing, caring... and snooping

Simon Carr

It's like Whack A Mole. Tirelessly the creature pops up, and sometimes we're quick enough to knock it on the head. The very next minute it pops up again.

The Regulatory Reform Bill was to give powers to ministers so they could change primary legislation without parliamentary scrutiny. There was an outcry. The Bill was dropped.

But it has popped up again in the Coroners and Justice Bill. Among the proposals is the power of any minister to instruct any person for any purpose to share any information with anyone. And in the absence of any clear specifications, people may be sent to jail for two years for "committing a crime as yet undefined", as Edward Garnier put it.

It's all with the best of intentions, of course – to protect the vulnerable and make public services more efficient. Data sharing is data caring.

The Government's most common way of data sharing is leaving 25 million of our records in the car park while they slip in for a pint. But this Bill seeks to go further. It's offering ministers the power to make data sharing orders by fiat. It also gives them the power "to modify any enactment" in pursuit of any policy they happen to make up. It could amend the Data Protection Act by saying data shouldn't be protected. It could amend the Human Rights Act.

The minister now accepts the clause is, um, "wider than it was intended to be" – but will she remove it from the Bill? Maybe later. The real offence remains.

Any list will be available to any minister. Store cards, internet subscribers to Girls Boarding School, the RSPCA, Friends of the Earth who've logged on to GM crop websites... Everything. Everyone. And the licence to sell the information on. Anywhere.

And it's not just the sharing of information. It's the use of data for purposes other than that for which it was collected.

Yes, but its national security so shut up. Terrorists are moving very fast, you know. George Howarth, from the intelligence committee, told us.

They're moving so fast they've gone back to pen and ink – undetectable by data-mining techniques. Take comfort then, we have a great source of terrorist disruption in the second class mail.

To call these "Henry VIII powers" is a calumny – David Howarth said – "on Henry VIII." It's true. Henry never had powers like these.

simoncarr@sketch.sc

More from Simon Carr

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Early Modern Labour
[info]taxfries wrote:
Friday, 27 February 2009 at 01:08 pm (UTC)
It's about time people started comparing the New Labour Cabinet with the ministers of Henry VIII.
What amazes me is that this lame duck government, which has internal divisions, and is almost certain to lose substantially in the general election of 2010, still has the momentum - one could argue, the zeal - and the support of Labour MPs - to continue with its ambition to acquire even greater arbitrary power. Is this a scorched earth policy by those such as Brown, Smith, and Straw, who worship power and despise liberal democracy?

Columnist Comments

andrew_grice

Andrew Grice: Enough of the philosophy, Mr Cameron.

Think-tanks play an important role in politics. But they have their limits.

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: Very nice - but forgiveness is overrated

Sometimes, as Lydon sang, in his post Sex Pistols band, 'anger is an energy.'

mary_dejevsky

Mary Dejevsky: Why not call Blair now and wrap it up?

The enquiry already seems like a sideline as the queues dwindle.


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion