Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 3° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Sophie Morris: You'll never shock a smoker

Thursday, 2 October 2008

Will the anti-smoking hecklers never give up? They have already banned smoking in all public places (a move with significant merit) and now they're trying to sneak their browbeating way into the most private of places, our handbags.

As of yesterday, all cigarette packets carry gruesome images of the effects smoking can have on your health. Black lungs mottled with sticky tar, a throat resembling an open wound infested with a swarm of wriggling leeches, sperm too puffed out to swim for victory. Not the sort of holiday snaps I wish to glimpse as I'm searching through my purse for a lighter.

As anyone who smoked five years ago will remember, covering a third of each packet of cigarettes with the warning that smoking clogs the arteries and smokers die younger (than whom, exactly?) quickly morphed into nothing more than a fertile source of pub small talk. Is there any reason why adding these pictures to packets won't have the same effect? Or do people start smoking before they can even read, and need the dangers of smoking spelled out in a photograph?

According to the Department of Health, smoking is still Britain's biggest killer, netting 87,000 victims a year. The Chief Medical Officer, Sir Liam Donaldson, hopes that the new strategy will maintain the quitting momentum propelled by last year's ban. The NHS says that 90,000 people called its smoking helpline after the written warnings were introduced in January 2003. But don't most smokers spend January trying to quit anyway, whether there are annoying warnings on packets or not?

In Brazil last summer, where the picture system is already up and running, people soon began collecting the different images, desensitised to the morbid illustrations by the end of their first packet. In Brazil these pictures include one of a dead foetus in a jar and another of a young girl using a mask as a breathing aid. There should be nothing at all funny to be found in ill health, but these images provoke gasps and sniggers in equal measure.

Humour is a tried and tested way to deflect fear, and most smokers are at least a little afraid of suffering the habit's side effects at some point in their futures. These arresting images will force gulps from all shoppers though, not just smokers. Everyone who sets foot inside an off licence or newsagent's, or approaches the tobacco counter in a supermarket, will see them, as will their children.

An associate of mine has a fairly bullish approach to the Government's attempts to coerce smokers into quitting. If smoking is really so bad for our health, she says, it should be outlawed altogether. She smokes herself, but can't see the logic in the draconian lengths the Government is willing to travel to dissuade people from committing a legal act.

Other fatal health threats hang over the British public – obesity, diabetes and alcohol-related illnesses, but I doubt you will find pictures of George Best adorning your bottles of pinot any time soon.

Are we going to see a public health official walking into Tesco with a loudspeaker, yelling: "Can the obese man in aisle 14 please step away from the custard creams. Your BMI is clearly well above the recommended 25!" Of course not, because that would be invasive and ineffective behaviour.

s.morris@independent.co.uk

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

49 Comments

even with this Labour goverments dictators smoking ban and the NHS exaggerated figures, also the lies by ASH about passive smoke, smokers are still smoking, all these things that the above agencies have done is to make themselves seen as the enemy to freedom of choice. As for the Labour party, this country will celebrate in 2010, when that party is gone.

Posted by clif | 08.10.08, 08:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Sophie
Entertaining though your article is, the evidence suggests that these shocking images do in fact work. Canada is often considered a world leader in tobacco control, having brought down it's smoking prevalence from the highest in the developed world 30 years ago to the lowest today (at around 19%). We have had such images here for many years and it is believed they have been part of this public health success.
We can make light of the consequences of tobacco but the reality is that it is the number one preventable of premature death in the world today at around 5 million fatalities a year. Responsible journalism would help to educate the public.

Dr Milan Khara
Vancouver
Canada

Posted by Dr Milan Khara | 06.10.08, 23:11 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I cant believe that 90.000 thousand people called the NHS help line to quit smoking, and I doubt a single one of them actually got to quit.

A few friends and I called it to have a laugh a few days ago, and indeed, a laugh we had. Some chavette at the other end of the line who couldnt bother less literally said 'We cant do anything to help you quit smoking, but we can provide you with a phone number for group therapy'.

Posted by tada | 05.10.08, 23:34 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

heartland........-org/////////////////Article.cfm?artId=23399

Scientific Evidence Shows Secondhand Smoke Is No Danger
Written By: Jerome Arnett, Jr., M.D.
Published In: Environment & Climate News
Publication Date: July 1, 2008
Publisher: The Heartland Institute


Exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) is an unpleasant experience for many nonsmokers, and for decades was considered a nuisance. But the idea that it might actually cause disease in nonsmokers has been around only since the 1970s.

Recent surveys show more than 80 percent of Americans now believe secondhand smoke is harmful to nonsmokers.


Posted by harleyrider1978 | 05.10.08, 23:11 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Ehhh when I were a lad we used to collect cigarette cards, we also played skimmers with the fronts and backs cut off fag packets, some where quiet colourful, not like the bland packets of today, maybe these new colourful images will bring that back," Swop my rotting teeth for your diseased lung, Smitty I havent got that one " As for adults well they will make no difference at all, we see worse images on TV all the time, and for those of a weaker disposition buy a cigarette case, the new cool accessory.
I like the analogy of ASH being the new Mary Whitehouse I hope in the long term they have the same Sucess which was precious little.

Posted by Anthony Williams | 05.10.08, 11:14 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

There are two reasons for smoking bans and neither of them are about health.
1. Quaratine/isolate the smoker.
2. Denormalize smoking.

Unfortunatley, the hospitality industry is caught in the cross-fire.
I like smoking even though I know the 'risks' of smoking.
Just like any body who drinks, eats, sky dive, mountain climbing, etc.
I thought 'Fascism' was dead after WW2 but I see it is alive and well.
Smoke from tobacco is a statistically insignificant health risk.

Posted by Tom Laprade | 03.10.08, 06:40 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I think extremists need banning they don't 'a'rf' cause a lot of trouble don't they!
NOT ARF !

Posted by Musician (miffed) | 03.10.08, 00:02 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Ive been thinking about this relatively new anti smoking-pro smoking problem.
And a problem it is.
You see whether your a smoker or non smoker it should ,if you have anything about you at all start to question the way Governments work in the west.
You should see a cynical manipulation of the media.
You should see the power one small lobby group can have on a so called Democracy.
You should see they way Politicians can be *manipulated..
How the media and Politicians can be manipulated if you have some money behind you.
How you can change the way people think about something i.e Cars Global warming Smoking Alchohol Being overweight.
As the global economy is now run by Multinationals and the ultra rich.
Politicians have nothing more to do than pass legislation ........
No sorry THEY WORK FOR US! "yea right"...
The enlightenment for us is the Ban has made this proccess TRANSPARENT .

Posted by Musician (miffed) | 02.10.08, 23:36 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I think the Anti Smoking Lobby in the UK it's mostly "ASH"
is well...
to draw a parralell.......
the MARY WHITEHOUSE of the 21ST Century.

Posted by Musician (miffed!) | 02.10.08, 21:04 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I will be still smokingSo I will show the nannies and bullies that I can draw my long bow. (Two fingered salute). Gordon Clown can go stuff himself.

Posted by DaveA | 02.10.08, 20:44 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

49 Comments