Commentators

null -1° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Terence Blacker: Forget fuzzy togetherness – ruthless individualism should be our legacy

Friday, 5 September 2008

Let us not panic. The news that Sebastian Coe is to launch the Cultural Olympiad by putting on his running shorts and sprinting through Tate Britain may not be encouraging. It might even justify fears that other desperate attempts to hobble art and sport together will follow: Tracey Emin doing the breast stroke at Tooting Bec Lido, Andrew Motion in a sonnet-reading race in the Albert Hall, Zara Phillips leading a three-day event team around a course of Damien Hirst sculptures.

But these are early days. Once he has done his Tate Britain run, Coe will be far too busy to bother about the cultural side of the Olympics with its piffling budget of £40 million. The real power will belong to Jude Kelly, the artistic director at the South Bank in London, and the many committees – 500, according to one estimate – whose task it will be to interpret the Government's "Olympics vision" for the arts.

In the great adventure of 2012, there can be few areas with a sharper potential for triumph or profound embarrassment than in the events where sport and art– spart, perhaps it should be called – are brought together.

The problem is that, in this context, vision is essentially a marketing exercise designed to emphasise diversity, youth, togetherness and all the wonderful things which the Government would like to promote.

Any decent expression of culture is the antithesis of marketing. Art that Olympic committees, anxious to please politicians, commission and design is likely to look like a New Labour commercial directed by a latter-day Leni Riefestahl.

Sebastian Coe's spartist dream is that the inspirational power of sport could be extended to culture, but the real lesson that top-level competitive sport offers is that achievement is never corporate – it is ruthlessly individual. The best results emerge not from a sense of social cohesiveness but from one person's greed for success.

2012 is to be "Everyone's Olympics" according to the slogan of the moment. If that idea infects the Cultural Olympiad, we will be in deep trouble.

The members of those 500 committees should resist government bullying to turn the arts into a sales placard for Britain. The most successful culture does more than express a fuzzy sense of togetherness, something which will be forgotten by the end of August 2012. It is spiky, individual, uncompromising.

If there is going to be a cultural legacy for this country beyond the Olympics – and it would be the scandal of a generation if there was not – there should be less spartism and talk of vision and more encouragement of individual excellence.

Beyond that, it should hardly need saying that the emphasis should be on youth and the future. Heritage will play badly on the world stage. It will make us look small, quaint and backward-looking.

There will presumably have to be the odd performance from the Royal Shakespeare Company but frankly the excitement and noise of the London Olympics are unlikely to be the perfect setting for King Lear or As You Like It.

The atmosphere and the dynamic of London 2012 should be more like a fringe festival – daring, unpredictable, radical, new.

The dead hand of Whitehall will be on much of what the country does during the next Olympic Games. Culture is the one area which might just wriggle free of marketing and corporate planning.

The art which London shows the world should be a fizzing celebration of originality, of difference within one nation. It might give other nations a shock that it is Britain which celebrates the bloody-minded individualism of its citizens but, if we do not, who will?

* Never mind Lewis Hamilton, Rebecca Adlington or Andy Murray. The vote of any sensible person seeking to nominate the BBC Sports Personality of the Year should go to Rebecca Romero.

It was extraordinary enough for one person to win silver and gold medals in two entirely different sports – rowing in Athens and cycling in Beijing. Since then, though, her comments have revealed her to be the perfect role model for sports stars of the future. Her uncompromising, obsessive mentality led her to abandon a highly successful rowing career because an Olympic silver and a world championship gold were not enough – she needed to be the unrivalled champion of her chosen event.

This approach is radically new in British sport. Our athletes in the past have been embarrassingly pleased to win any kind of medal; the Romero approach, increasingly prevalent among the new generation of sports stars, is that only winning is good enough.

She refuses to whinge about lack of funding – "You just have to get up and find a sport that is cheap," she told one interviewer – and is delighted not to be part of the celebrity world. Elite athletes should not, she believes, be particularly well paid. Football has become more of an industry than a sport.

After the next Olympics, she may well consider taking up another event. "I am very inquisitive," she says. "My mentality is to challenge myself and find my breaking point... I am constantly looking to break the boundaries."

What a nutter. What a hero.

Lessons in the art of resignation

One in four Britons, amounting to six million people, is unhappy in his or her job, according to a YouGov/TUC survey, released with cruel timing to coincide with the end of the holidays. Quite a few of these people will be studying the conduct of two senior football managers with particular interest. Alan Curbishley has just walked out of his highly paid job at the Premiership club West Ham because his board refused to buy in the new players that were needed. Kevin Keegan has threatened to leave Newcastle United because his bosses have given more power than he likes to the club's football director.

It is a brave step, to give yourself your marching orders for reasons of dignity and self-respect. Even in better times, it can backfire and seem petulant or self-important. Keegan already has a consider able reputation as a bolter.

But almost certainly these two brave, reckless men are setting a worthwhile example. Just now and then, those with power and money need to be reminded that employees are people, not disposable units of investment.

* Two great crises of the moment, obesity and crime, have coincided with unfortunate effect. There are apparently now so many fat policemen that a car containing two burly officers will, under Home Office safety regulations, only be allowed to carry one suspect. It is "an area of primary concern", a spokesman for North Yorkshire police has said. An area of further concern might be whether these tubby coppers are capable of catching a suspect in the first place.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

21 Comments

Hi Lumukanda, thanks for elaborating.

Posted by llanvi | 07.09.08, 00:29 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Just a selection of the books Sarah Palin attempted to ban in the library of the town she was mayor of in Alaska: up to H of on A-Z list.

A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess
A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle
Annie on My Mind by Nancy Garden
As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner
Blubber by Judy Blume
Brave New World by Aldous Huxley
Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson
Canterbury Tales by Chaucer
Carrie by Stephen King
Catch-22 by Joseph Heller
Christine by Stephen King
Confessions by Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Cujo by Stephen King
Curses, Hexes, and Spells by Daniel Cohen
Daddy’s Roommate by Michael Willhoite
Day No Pigs Would Die by Robert Peck
Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller
Decameron by Boccaccio
East of Eden by John Steinbeck
Fallen Angels by Walter Myers
Fanny Hill (Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure) by John Cleland
Flowers For Algernon by Daniel Keyes
Forever by Judy Blume
Grendel by John Gardner
Halloween ABC by Eve Merriam

Posted by Oxymoron | 06.09.08, 19:17 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Paul Goward, once the Police Chief for Winter Haven, Florida, lost his job after complaints that a memo he sent entitled, "Are You a Jelly Belly?," hurt the feelings of some of the fitness-challenged members of the police department.

Case for the Human Rice brigade !

Posted by Binky Finklestein | 06.09.08, 18:29 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Cont... There is individualism and there is individualism. There is the kind of individualism which Oscar Wilde said was the object of "Socialism". In fact, Wilde was really an anarchist. Then there is another kind of individualism, which is all about ego, getting one up on someone else, being better than others, excelling the opposition, which is not the same as aiming for excellence. Very few genuine artists are individualist in the second sense. They have very little ego. Ego gets in the way of real achievement. Ego is the product of the way competition narrows us down to something defined by others, not ourselves. That "ourselves" does not resist co-operation where co-operation is required by circumstances, but it does resist being incorporated by groups or collectives whose structure is not a spontaneous one.

Posted by Lumukanda | 05.09.08, 17:38 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I did say that writing a poem was like inhabiting a windowless monad. One sees only the poem, not anything outside. And even if there is an intention at the beginning, that intention is soon left behind because one becomes too obsessed with getting the poem right. On the other hand, I have worked with others, not in writing poems, but mounting them for performance. And then one is not concerned to impose one's own vision on them, but let them come to their own vision of it. This is real co-operation, the kind, for example Gus Vant Sant has when making a film like, say My Own Private Idaho when he allowed River Phoenix to rewrite parts of the role. It demonstrates a tremendous confidence in yourself to relinquish that much control and work with another. We have, I suspect, a very restricted idea of the meaning of co-operation. It was essential to our paleolithic survival and is written in our genes. We even get a release of dopamine from it, which produces a high.

Posted by Lumukanda | 05.09.08, 16:53 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

cont/d - ). It can also lead to suspicion and social engineering or gerrymandering between mass “groups” when most able people - men, women, this colour, that colour, this age, that age, this economic class, that economic class - feel DIMINISHED being “mass grouped”, herded, anyway. I judge other people (men, women, this colour, that colour, et cetera) on an individual basis, not automatically on the grounds of any one of those mass group characteristics. The current doctrine generates suspicion and the wrong kind of - i.e. “mass group” - competition. And superficialities-fixated social manipulation, and personal passivity, are also boring, soul-destroying.

Tho. cultural Olympiad business might actually turn out to be quite an amusing cultural landmark. Must go. We need a noughties Swift, I reckon.

Posted by nfrith | 05.09.08, 16:22 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

summer rain - shame “allergic” came out as it did! Tho. “came out” misleading – say no to passivity can be my slogan for the day.

There are so many important issues at stake here. “Society” needs to promote personal/family strength and to develop a new language with a more complex grammar to describe the protection of adults who are infirm or not able or not socially competent or not socially willing without herding us into superficial mass factions - constantly talking simplistically about mass “groups” results in a stranglehold of mean averages and intellectual torpor and arguments with no substance about supposedly eternally fixed mass positions on playing fields, and about issues that don’t really need to be issues (the kind of discussion a particular commentator in this paper generates - saddens me as I sense she could be interesting if she ever cast that off).

Posted by nfrith | 05.09.08, 16:11 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

lumukanda, I'm interested in your points but to me while very like-minded creative people sometimes make great spontaneous creative unions `co-operative' feels coarse and suffocating – quite socially prescriptive, too. I don’t see the Romero comparison as being about competition with other individuals in a rigid social framework - called `arts' - it has more the sense of competition with oneself – represents valuing stand-alone (not group) empowerment, individual energy, the drive within the individual, and in terms of being creative, the depths within the individual, the insight into those depths, + insight back outwards into the world, the willingness to stand or fall (maybe terminally) on one’s own merits, having the inner confidence to steer clear of conformism (while being very interested in the world around about). I believe so much of what is very best about Western culture has come from valuing and cultivating that kind of intelligence and confidence(/nutter behaviour?).

Posted by llanvi | 05.09.08, 14:06 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

"something that focuses positively on the INDIVIDUAL, the fact we are all entirely unique and that people with real talent tend to be alergic to groups?"

Exactly. I get sick and tired of the obsession with 'working with others', 'working as a team' and all the other American corporate speak that has infected every school/college in the land. It's all a ploy to make more profit by making people cowed and cloned and unable to think for themselves.

I know all the people doing this Art olympic nonsense and all the schools involved will be putting 'teamwork' on their lesson plans and ticking the 'teamwork' box. Typical. But I agree with you - great art (writing, composing, and thinking) are all utterly individual - though that individual expression can be realised by many of course, in a concert etc.

By the way, I run my own business and am a writer and am v defninitely allergic to groups and the corporate world.

"Is national non-diversity day the best name?"

No idea.

Posted by summer rain | 05.09.08, 14:06 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The production of orchestral performances and plays is co-operative but to my taste it takes individual genius to compose the very best. So many brilliant poets and artists who are now dead were barely known during their lifetimes. Not to say they weren't deeply interested in the world, society. Ultimately taste plays a strong role – to me `co-operative' suggests leveling out to the level of others in a group, everyone coarsening their individual tastebuds just a little (or a lot, if the co-operative is rubbish).

Posted by llanvi | 05.09.08, 12:51 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

21 Comments

Columnist Comments

deborah_orr

Deborah Orr: One more inquiry isn't going to help

I don't believe a public inquiry into the Baby P case is necessary

hamish_mcrae

Hamish McRae: It will take time, but we'll recover

If officialdom seems over-optimistic in its forecasts, the markets seem too pessimistic

janet_street_porter

Janet Street-Porter: Mother does not always know best

One of the most sensitive subjects for writers is the mother-daughter relationship

mark_steel

Mark Steel: Never mind the baby, just get back to work

The next thing will be an exciting new scheme known as the 'workhouse'