William Gumede: Mbeki must face up to South Africa's xenophobia
Wednesday, 21 May 2008
Long-standing official denial of xenophobia is at the heart of the terrible violence against foreign African refugees spreading through Johannesburg. For years, warnings by local rights groups that the regular attacks in townships, rural towns and inner-city slums on foreign Africans will soon escalate have been ignored by the South African government.
Yet in spite of the bloody attacks, the South African government and President Thabo Mbeki's response has been staggeringly unconvincing. Astonishingly, the police are blaming a "third force" of shadowy individuals supposedly behind orchestrating the attacks. To do so is to ignore spectacularly not only the deep-seated prejudice against refugees from poorer neighbours but also the resentment generally against African immigrants.
Poor Africans from the rest of the continent seek refuge in South Africa, a relative haven of prosperity and stability compared with the disintegrating countries that they come from.
Mbeki – typically – says he will set up a committee to investigate the causes of the bloody attacks, but in the meantime the death toll rises, with thousands homeless and living in fear of the next attack. The police cannot cope, but the government has been reluctant to call in the army to help, saying it is not yet an emergency.
Given its immediate history of overcoming colonialism and racialised segregation, South Africans were supposed to be more tolerant. But in spite of Mbeki making African solidarity the pillar of his presidency, both black and white South Africans still view their country as a subcontinent outside or separate from the rest of Africa.
Furthermore, up to now South Africa has not developed any effective policy to deal with the largest mass immigration into the country – not only from Africa, but from the hotspots of Asia and Eastern Europe – in modern history.
The ANC government has been paralysed over whether it should have a European-style fortress policy, switching on an electric border fence erected by the apartheid government to keep the Africans out, or open up the borders to desperate refugees fleeing instability elsewhere. During apartheid, many neighbouring countries supported the ANC. This often came at great costs to those countries, whose infrastructure was bombed into ruins by vindictive apartheid South Africa governments. Not surprisingly, and rightly, the ANC government feels it has some moral obligation to destitute Africans fleeing oppression in their own countries. But in the vacuum over the lack of an immigration policy, the home affairs department has adopted a tough stance against refugees.
The xenophobic sentiment cuts across race and levels of income. White farmers pay black immigrant workers pitiable wages. Black professionals think white companies use them as "scabs", rather than appointing more local blacks. Africans are regularly accused by the police, media and local politicians of fuelling the country's high crime rate. Police routinely stop and search foreign Africans, sometimes even mistaking locals for foreigners, and deport them if they don't have their identity documents with them. Corrupt police force members often extract bribes from African foreigners to shield them from arrest or deportation.
The specific incidents in Alexandra, which started the violent attacks, had much to do with the failure of government to deliver services to the poor. The trouble was sparked by a combination of grievances over lack of delivery of local services, such as housing, and the economy's failure to create jobs, as well as perceptions of local corruption.
In these townships, there is a feeling that foreigners bribe local government officials to access housing and trading licences, while locals have to wait for years. Some South African-owned small businesses have also been attacked, for allegedly employing "foreigners" and not locals.
Furthermore, the poor in South Africa have little influence on ANC policy, and the newly democratic institutions are often indifferent to them. Having no outlet for their grievances, those on the bottom rung vent them on foreign Africans.
Making South Africa's infant democracy, institutions and leaders more responsive and accountable must be part of the solution to the problem of xenophobia. It would also help if Mbeki abandoned his policy of propping up African dictators, and assisted the democratic forces in African countries run by despots. But sadly, in the eyes of outsiders, the latest incidents will probably only confirm thier view of South Africa as prejudiced towards people from the rest of the continent.
WM Gumede is the author of 'Thabo Mbeki and the Battle for the Soul of the ANC'

Comments
24 Comments
the private sector may pay lower wages but the mines employ 50% (of a massive workforce) migrant labour - why is that? the south africans don't want to do that job - its below them - easy money from crime instead - even with the poverty in the rest of Africa - they don't have 20.000 murders per year- moral meltdown - shame on you - these african nations helped you during apartheid - this exodus could cause instability to the whole southern african region - what happens when suddenly all the mozam mine migrants don't have jobs & as for 3rd force-maybe - but to say its white right wingers just laughable-!! they are terrified of instability they have no country to go to.they are south african. the only good deed zim government has ever done for their people is too lay on buses & trains WHY? is it because the arms shipment from china has finally arrived? - these poor people - how much more can they take?
Posted by gill | 26.05.08, 03:44 GMT
We should have seen it coming. Because if you look at the young black men and women of that generation, you will see a group of people raised as terrorists - let's call them for what they were - promised a better life post-apartheid, and disappointed. There's an entire generation of people out there who were never taught the difference between 'right' and 'easy', and we are all paying for it now.
And I would just like to say in response to an earlier comment that apartheid was not the evil empire it was made out to be. In the end, it was something done with good intentions that turned out badly. But it was never intended to repress. It was intended to protect the black people, who were not ready to interact fully in Western civilization, until they could. To keep them safe from the things they were not equipped to deal with yet, not because they were less, but because they had not come this far yet. That was the original idea.
It turned out badly...but then so has the rule of the ANC
Posted by Bernice Mills | 25.05.08, 08:58 GMT
As a black american who studied in Jo-burg, I do not find this surprising at all. I witnessed a great deal of xenophobia against other black africans by south africans. This horrible prejudice is rampant in South Africa and needs to be stopped. The irony is that black africa was a refuge for south africans during apartheid. For shame! Why not hold your true oppressors accountable instead of engaging in self hatred by killing other poor blacks.
Posted by stacey | 23.05.08, 14:49 GMT
What happens to all the whites in South Africa and some of the blacks when South Africa becomes just another African country? Is their hope for us?
Almost 70% of the votes went to the ANC in the last elections. What about the people who are against the ANC?
Posted by James | 23.05.08, 00:33 GMT
South Africa needs a new government. The ANC has failed more than anything else.
Posted by Ruan | 23.05.08, 00:17 GMT
There is absolutely no excuse for what is happening in South Africa. WM Gumede should not look for some flimsy excuses for for the xenophobia. Things of this nature should be condemned by all in unequivocal terms.I remember reading similar excuses for apartheid years ago. Only then, Gumede was on the receiving end.
Posted by I Kanyemba | 22.05.08, 16:15 GMT
The SOUTH AFRICAN gorvernment is employing inadequate infrastructure to ease the current situation prevailing in the gauteng provence, the conditions need prompt response of the national defece minister T.LEKOTA. death of two personss who are heading these attacks wiil ease the conditions therein gauteng proper communication with GAUTENG resideces will contribute more to easing of the xenophobic attacks, this issssue must not be politicized, nevertheless the south african refugees policy be reviewed and be communicated with SOuth AFricans in order ti bring about peace and staBILITY IN S.A
Posted by MOFOLO | 22.05.08, 09:15 GMT
The SOUTH AFRICAN gorvernment is employing inadequate infrastructure to ease the current situation prevailing in the gauteng provence, the conditions need prompt response of the national defece minister T.LEKOTA. death of two personss who are heading these attacks wiil ease the conditions therein gauteng proper communication with GAUTENG resideces will contribute more to easing of the xenophobic attacks, this issssue must not be politicized, nevertheless the south african refugees policy be reviewed and be communicated with SOuth AFricans in order ti bring about peace and staBILITY IN S.A
Posted by MOFOLO | 22.05.08, 09:13 GMT
i think that my attempted late posting got lost - i was pointing out that it is not just a human trait to repel incomers competing for resources, its a feature of all living species, from micro-organisms to plants and animals; unless the newcomers can offer positive advantages to the residents, they are attacked, all in the interests of ensuring survival of the genes of the locals...
there are lots of other ancient 'genetic memories' in our so-called advanced human societies: think of how mindlessly a new male partner may kill the offspring of his woman's earlier matings, all in the interests of genetic survival...;
politicians would do well to pay a bit more attention to basic biology!
Posted by jaff | 22.05.08, 09:12 GMT
You tell me how one can work for a neighbor while her/his own children are still hungry, as a South African citizen I feel, we were not ready to take people in our country yet till everybody working together to build the country. Our government is good on pointing fingers on other people except them selves. Why did they left foreigners to do what they want to do. What they saying now is that when the boarder are broken its good, when the citizens are going hungry its also good, The Army must just Kill, thats what our president is saying. Couldn't d they make a plan from the beginning. the President isn't doing any thing about Mugabe and his lakes, the problems that we've got in our country are myriad and our government can't deal with them first but inviting foreigners in. It looks like every African country is not willing to fix, but to destroy, Show me one country thats going well, Its a disaster I'm black but feel depressed the way things are in Africa, wars everywhere its a shame
Posted by Khanyo | 22.05.08, 08:58 GMT
24 Comments