Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: We're still the most class-ridden country under the sun
There is something about the chutzpah and aplomb of theTory boys
A new You-Gov poll finds that a majority of voters (52 per cent against 31 per cent) still believe that David Cameron and his pride of glam and louche Tories favour the rich and are too distant from the commoners beneath them. Gordon Brown's attack on the toffs clearly chimed with many. He savaged eco supremo Zac Goldsmith, a Tory candidate who turns out to be a part-time British citizen – his other self is a non-dom somewhere where piles are kept safely away from grasping tax regimes. Goldsmith does pay taxes on his UK earnings; now he is ordered by his leader to relocate his inherited loot back here.
In modern Britain, class still matters and Cameron – who is keen on being seen as déclassé – knows how much and yet doesn't. When he talks, for example, about "broken Britain" and comes up with marriage enforcement plans, he clearly doesn't mean all those in his own party who run through more marriages than cars. His Big Idea in education, allowing parents to set up and run their own schools, will disproportionately advantage those of us who are middle class.
Two supercilious Tories have said to me that Speaker John Bercow "lacks class". The son of a taxi driver made good is, to one of them, "a nobody who social climbs like a monkey". He does seem to try too hard to impress his party – at one point, so severe were his declared views that even Norman Tebbit thought him too right wing. Like his predecessor as Speaker, Michael Martin, he is seen as a class interloper, who, unlike Betty Boothroyd, has not acquired imperious authority.
Class plays out all over the place. Stacey Solomon, the contestant on X Factor, "is too estate for me" said a female bank worker, Debbie, to her friend in Southwark as they munched their sandwiches and coffee near me. Debbie ate sloppily with her mouth open. The anger against RBS bankers is bringing up insurgent nausea once again. It is as if the skeletons of the Peasants' Revolt have risen from burial pits as overpaid, reckless men still blackmailing our nation. Sack them. Let them eat cake somewhere else. If, with RBS on their CV, they can get millions, go then, say I and millions of others on the Left. Class enmity is suddenly cool. Or hot maybe, boiling.
The rising bile is also a protest against New Labour dogmatists who neglected swelling income inequality, a boil, a plague in some parts. That shakes up old lines of the class war. Margaret Thatcher disenfranchised manual workers, and left a nation bitterly divided. Her Toryism dismissed class analysis as a "communist concept". Then New Labour jettisoned its ideological identity, embraced individualistic capitalism whilst promising community and inclusivity. It didn't happen. Instead all the key architects attached themselves to those who were privileged and hideously rich. Mr Brown scorns the toffs but is he himself, or Mandleson, or Blair, any better?
Britain today is more unequal than most developed countries. A study by the University of Essex showed hardly any social mobility and 90 per cent of 18- to 24-year- olds feeling fixed in their place. BNP voters who blame immigrants for their trapped lives should instead focus on the politicians and money-makers who cynically wasted "estate" citizens. As the historian David Cannadine wrote: "Class is one of the most important aspects of modern British history [and] of modern British life". Andrew Marr brilliantly revealed this enduring national characteristic in his TV series, animating in an image here, a thought there, enormous social changes and deep conservatism.
Today we see the same. The more Britain changes the more it stays the same. Take lottery millionaires, super-rich pop and football stars, City gamblers, seedy prospectors, all loaded – but which class would they belong to? Then there is the appeal of the upper classes – many are delightful, gracious and some my good friends. I can't stand their lifestyles but can't resist their company.
My feelings towards top cultural operators are similarly ambiguous. I resent the places they occupy and pass on down to their own, but envy and want their self belief, yearning to be AA Gill. I sent my kids to private schools to get that polish and certainty. Now I wonder if that was the right thing to do. Alan Bennett said in 1988: "The real solvent of class distinction is a proper measure of self-esteem – a kind of unselfconsciousness. Some people are at ease with themselves, so the world is at ease with them". He could never acquire that effortless confidence.
David Cameron has it; Gordon Brown does not. Gordon's class rallying cry roused me but there is something about the chutzpah and aplomb of the Tory boys. That is the problem and why Cameron will most likely win the election. We know he, like Boris, cannot relate to ordinary Britons, but gosh look, he's an instinctive leader, stylish and so authoritative. Old class order will return again because so many will not be able to resist it. I find the thought unbearable. Don't you?
y.alibhai-brown@independent.co.uk
More from Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited





Comments
Playing the "Class" card is typical of them
How much worse the Tories will be,is something we are going to find out.
Blair and Brown went to public schools,did they not?Not as well known or prestigious as Camerons' maybe.
Tradionally,proles and toffs have had an understanding of how things are,seeing eye to eye,mutually despising arrivistes like Blair and Brown and their Ilk.
From the Utes of New Mexico,to the peoples of the Indian sub continent,to the Scots Highlanders who look down their noses at plastic jocks like Blair and brown,to the East Anglians who still refer tp you as a "Newcomer" after 30 years,to the North Welsh who...........
Why are you still engaging poor, dear Yasmin to repeat the same old themes over and over?
Surely decent journalists are not so scarce that you cannot engage someone not past their use-by-date (her best-before-date has long since expired).
Everyone is bored witless by her ramblings about "class". She has a terrible hang-up about it, whilst most of the population don't.
Seriously though, we have become a society that only respects money. People obsess about winning the lottery or making it big in the world of show biz or sport where fortunes are supposedly made. We have developed a shallow celebrity culture where ,as Oscar Wilde would have put it, people know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
The problem with David Cameron and his team is that they come almost exclusively from a particular group in society. They have little experience of having to make do, and for George Osborne to claim about the coming economic austerity that "we're all in this together", lacked credibility because Mr Osborne is rich enough for it not to matter to him.
We need above all leadership and we're not getting it. The French aristocrats lost their heads because they were insulated from reality and were oblivious to the suffering of the rest of French society. Does our present generation of politicians understand what has happened to many of our fellow citizens over the past 30 years of so? The expenses scandal shows how dangerously out of touch they are.
I have been bitterly disappointed by New Labour and I don't believe the Tories have any answers either. It has nothing to do with social class. These people just lack the "class" to lead.
Why concentrate on the Tories, Andrew Marr along with Alistair Darling went to the exclusive Loretto school. Harman, part of the Spicer paper family went to St Pauls for Girls. Balls went to the private school Nottingham High. Blair went to Fettes, known as the Eton of Scotland. Strange how they only concentrate on the Tories?
If the only thing they can do is assert their ideas, then challenge them on - what experience do they have? Have they even worked in the private sector in a non-political field? And where finance is concerned, are they quantitative?
Don't let the self confidence bully you in submission!
He had absolutely no practical experience (work-related) in economics, relying strongly on Treasury leaks for years - details shouted out regularly whilst in opposition. Some may remember him coming on the BBC programme, headed by Frank Bough, in the 1980s where he bragged and laughed about his "inside information". That clip used to be on youtube until No.10 orderly it to be removed. More recently, there was the ridiculous action taken by the ridiculous Jacqui Smith to allow the police raiding of Damian Green's office in Westminister over a Treasury leak.
Brown thundered last year about the financial situation needing experience, yet in 1997 he had none himself. His record as Chancellor was abyssmal, with a laundry list of tax and spend disasters. As far as logic tells us, any new government with Ministers not having in government before, would have no experience. Does that prohibit new governments, per se?
Cable, however, is at least a proper economist, who had strong socialist links in his early career.
there are those among us who think school is a pointless waste of their precious time and we end up paying for these folks as illiterate adults on benefits, living aimlessly between giro's
please don't put the entire class blame on the rich and brainy, the lazy 'can't be bothered its geeky' brigade well put in their fair share of the class structure, happy to loaf about on other peoples graft
And sorry,i for one cannot respect them for their chosen way of life, tho I accept their right to choose it
The Roundtree Foundation has found that poverty has noticeably increased whilst labour have been in government. This proves that labour politicians have had no real interest in putting anything in place to offset the additional poverty created by competition and have left the poorest working class to their own devices. Politicians and bureaucrats have no skills to put anything in place even if they could be bothered to try. They live in a orgy of self serving doing everything in their power to increase their own life chances as the expenses saga shows. The UK needs a fair proportional voting system so that the dinosaur parties who have no interest in representing the interests of the public can be voted down and replaced by new parties that will.
I accept that comment may have been intended as a bit of hyperbole, but I feel I have to point out that the important difference between India and the UK is that the latter simply does not have the kind of mass poverty of Dickensian or Hogarthian proportions that currently still exists in the former.
I find your article confused. You seem to be trying to say you aren't into class warfare whilst in fact you've obviously got some great chip in your shoulder.
What is this nonsense about Eton education not being a decent kind of education? Brown making a "joke" in Parliament? Come off it. He was screeching like a banshee. He HATES at least half of Britain's population because they aspire to do better. Look what his ludicrous rant says to aspiring young people, Aspiring people - and their hopeful parents wanting them to do well - now know that a Labour government will do them down, sneer at them and insult them, the moment they "improve themselves". So under Labour, don't aspire to improve yourself or you will end up a laughing stock - bawled and screeched at by that bullying resentful whinger Brown and his repulsive moaning buddies.
Whatver education Gordon Brown had obviously didn't befit him to lead this country, nor to run the Treasury - where instead of doing good for this country, he helped to spend everything we had and then borrow like there's no tomorrow. Brown is no better than the gambling bankers. It seems to have set him up to shout at those he hates. What aspiration does he have? It seems, to bring us down to his pitiful level of seething envy.
We need a PM who wants people to do better if they can, to get richer, to enjoy life. Labour seem to want to encourage misery and bad temper and hatred of anyone who has more than themselves whilst making no effort at all to get what those others have. Much as I despised Blair, he was right in taking Labour towards decency to all people and it paid off for him with three election wins., Brown is out to return to his own preference - Old Labour of 100 years ago when they really did have some reason to hate the uncaring rich and ranting against the rich sounded so good..
You all want to end up on benefits? Vote Labour. Youwant to get somewhere, do better? Vote Tory or LibDem.
We need John Smith back from the dead!
Oops, sorry, not what you meant? Couldn't tell through all the bile and rhetoric.
It starts with education. We should be producing an education system for all along the lines of that for which the wealthy enough pay. Some who are prepared to pay for their offspring to get the advantage of a good education, making sacrifices.
Even the health care system does not involve extra money collected from all to pay for the increased cost of providing for the population as a whole. We encourage a private health care system in tandem.
How to change this class system would require of those who benefit most to change the system to their disadvantage.
Changeing a social system is not easy. The first step is the desire to do so.
The Alibhai-Brown's of this world have done rather better than almost all of the UK working class, their snotty holier than thou attitude is laughable.
They know bugger all about their subject matter & the Indy & other papers should at least allow those who have/do experience the class divide & its effects to comment, but that would be like the eminent scientists that doubt the reasons for global warming being given the opportunity to state their case.
Fact of the matter is the UK working class has (pro rata) always had the worst deal of all. This is often lost in the agenda of sexism, racism & aptly sounds similar to schism, or more accurately intended divisiveness.
Alibhai-Brown seems to have an agenda (may be unintentional) which ignores the very people who are disadvantaged the most; could this be because they are predominately white?
Alibhai-Brown arrived in the UK in the 70's when many young working class had to pay their own way through the vagaries of higher education with little guidance or assistance from a system that discouraged even the thought they were at worse academically equal to the more socially acceptable entrants to this system, while paying their own fees could watch the likes of herself & the ‘muddled class’ gain access to what seemed a highly selective grant system for their uni education.
If she actually understood she would know the problem does not begin with race or belief it begins with education, but perhaps she understood sufficiently to put her own offspring through the private education system thus perpetuating all she purports to dislike, & just like the rest at the very exclusive dining table with their Guardian place mats continues to berate the rest who have little choice but to tolerate this system.
It is one of this country's main problem, and it is such a problem because the citizen's have no idea how insidious it is in their culture [it is also for this reason that so little has, or is being done to change it].
As a young boy growing up in Australia, I remember my hippie English/Society teacher waxing fervent about Australia's desire to be an egalitarian society and how important it was to the young country. I, in truth, had no real idea what he was going on about, until I came here 15 years ago as a young idealistic teacher myself. I worked in an area dominated by a certain Ford car factory, and I often marvelled at the indifference of the [middle class] staff. Eventually one teacher revealed the truth of it. Whilst discussing a certain child, she let slip; 'why bother, he's only going to end up at the factory like his father'.
It was after this that I started to understand the words of my old teacher, [though sadly Australia has slipped from its lofty goal in recent years]. But it meant that my background as a dirt-poor, gypsy boy with no shoes and a weird nutter-religion family was given the same chance in my education as the richer kids. Ok, some things they couldn't compensate for, but they still awarded my intelligence, hard work and determination.
I know full well it would have been a very different story had my family stayed here.
And yes elevengoalposts, Yasmin does need to keep bring up the same themes, because as she highlights in the article, almost nothing has changed in this society, and it's holding your country back. You lose half your stock of great sport stars when those children are raised in estates with 'No Ball Games' written on the walls, and with no affordable swimming pools. You lose out on your educated masses when only the 'select' few get a decent education.
Two things will help to shake this up, firstly, ditching the absurdly unfair first-past-the-post voting system, and secondly abolishing the monarchy and all the archaic snivelling, grovelling and braying class tribalism with which it is associated.
As soon as your born they make you feel small,
By giving you no time instead of it all,
Till the pain is so big you feel nothing at all,
A working class hero is something to be,
A working class hero is something to be.
They hurt you at home and they hit you at school,
They hate you if you're clever and they despise a fool,
Till you're so fucking crazy you can't follow their rules,
A working class hero is something to be,
A working class hero is something to be.
When they've tortured and scared you for twenty odd years,
Then they expect you to pick a career,
When you can't really function you're so full of fear,
A working class hero is something to be,
A working class hero is something to be.
Keep you doped with religion and sex and TV,
And you think you're so clever and classless and free,
But you're still fucking peasents as far as I can see,
A working class hero is something to be,
A working class hero is something to be.
There's room at the top they are telling you still,
But first you must learn how to smile as you kill,
If you want to be like the folks on the hill,
A working class hero is something to be.
A working class hero is something to be.
If you want to be a hero well just follow me,
If you want to be a hero well just follow me.
The shock would be if a left wing party ever did come to power again (like after the War)
and finished the job of making England a democracy.
Unfortunatley I think Labour would rather have people blame everything and everbody rather than take responsiblity for their own actions and work hard, hence the 'toff' card. My question is rather than Labour hand out benefits how are they going to help that person or town get on? All I have heard from them is criticism of 'toffs' but nothing positive.
The only way forward for people to have real social mobility is too provide:-
(a) Encourage people to aspire for something better rather than creating apathy and barriers.
(b)Encourage people to look at success as a good thing.
(c) Provide more opportunities for people to get on to move out of the poverty trap (training, taxes, education)
I really question Labour's motives whether they are actaully helping the people they are meant to represent. I think they want a class war, a them and us attitude and I think they want to keep the workers poor and uneducated!
To support a goverment that makes the top 10% richer an other 90% poorer is idiotic and makes me hope to leave this place as soon as i can!
Labour only have a chance if they replace Brown.
Let's hoep they then sort immigration, and the economy.
The working class can kiss my arse I've got the foreman's job at last.
I believe that the main issue with differences between working and middle classes is the differences in how we see the world and how we think, this creates some significant and sometimes insurmountable barriers to self improvement. Being working class is not about what you have or what you don't have, there are many middle class or upper class people with nothing and vice versa. The difference is that middle and upper class people are able to make choices as to whether to pursue material wealth, they also know that opportunities are there when they need them. I believe that the article focuses too much on the haves and have nots, and touches slightly on the more important psychological aspects of being a working class thinker, as Yasmin says Alan Bennett struggled with this and it is highlighted in Malcom Gladwell's book "outliers" where an American genius of working class origin doesn't have a University degree because he is unable to relate to the middle class world to get what he needs so that he can complete his degree, as a consequence he has aborted studies twice and works as a mail man writing a magnum opus in his spare time, a document which will probably never be read by any proffessor at university because he is not considered to be "qualified". He is compared to his genius equal Bill Gates who as an young teenager has access to the University of Washington's mainframe computer (one of only a few that existed in the world at the time) and was encouraged by his parents to actively pursue his computing interests, the rest of the story you know.
Puttng it simply, middle class kids have a greater sense of entitlement and are encouraged to assert themselves with adults, where as generally speaking, working class kids are more likely to be told to sit still and shut up, as a consequence we learn to despise authority and mistrust those who are in power. The middle class also seems to have a clearer sense of which battles to fight and how sometimes keeping quiet can win the war in the long run, they see authority as an aid to progress rather than an obstacle. In contrast working class folks have an over developed sense of fairness with corresponding feelings of outrage which is effectively used and manipulated by the British media and political groups. The immigration issue is a good example of this, our sense of outrage should be directed to the 1% of the population who currently hold 50% of the nation's wealth but as this 1% control the media and politics so you don't see the mass media regularly feeding these stories to the General public.
For the upwardly mobile working class person, as the Lennon song goes in the thread identifies, cultural issues like these have been ingrained for half a lifetime and require the other half to erase, that is of course, once they have been identified. Therefore, being working class is mostly I believe, about having a poor state of mental health, and that lack of confidence comes directly out of that. Our attitudes and outlook can be big turn off to the middle class. Opportunities do abound but as working class people we either cannot see them or do not have the capacity to take them.