Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 10° London Hi 11°C / Lo 7°C

Yasmin Alihbai-Brown: Why does self-hatred afflict so many non-white people?

The urge to lighten one's skin colour is a disturbing sign of 'ethnic' psychosis

I stare at the mirror – at my age always a testing moment, as callous time etches and doodles relentlessly. But still, it is my face, uniquely mine, sometimes still able to attract the odd flirty bloke. I don't recoil from my own image. But apparently I should.

Definers of beauty have judged women of the East and South to be aesthetically and even biologically inferior to white females. Coloured skin, even today, is a curse unless it is a fake tan. Then there are those flat noses, or big fleshy ones; thick lips (considered gorgeous on Scarlett Johansson but not on Whoopi Goldberg); short necks and legs; apple and plum shapes. What a lot of uglies we are, so far removed from the perfect womanhood of Charlize Theron and Helen Mirren.

Women the world over have been so brainwashed they now worship such golden goddesses, and some are so demented and/or stupid that they have themselves reconstructed, to become a little more like western lovelies.

And so rises a new army of plastic surgeons to make any race look more Caucasian, more gorgeous. Some even believe they are thereby creating a new "de-racialised" world. They have charts and measurements, percentages and figures to show our faces are more brutish and less pleasing than those of Caucasians. You can watch some of these creepy rich gits tomorrow on Bleach, Nip, Tuck: The White Beauty Myth on Channel 4. Watch and wail.

Here is Tahira, a naturally pretty Bangladeshi woman who hates her toffee-coloured skin because her own people have declared it horribly dark, especially when compared with the light colour of her husband. So she uses skin-lightening creams, most of which are known to cause untold damage, She pathetically says: "Michael Jackson, I love his colour. I mean, I just want to know what type of things he used to become that colour".

Glamour model Jet, who is of Caribbean origin, also hugely admires Jackson and wants to look like a Barbie doll. She has her nose and face fixed so she doesn't look like those pram-pushing black women who "don't want to move on with their lives". A young Asian bloke called Mun was viciously attacked by a white gang and so now goes through serial surgery to make his features as western as possible. He wants to show his racist attackers that he too can look like them and become a model. So there. He claims he is not denying his ethnic identity, but only wants to join the "mainstream". Darling boy, much deluded, expecting a second child. Hope the newborn has the good sense to be "mainstream". I know Muslim men who are going off to Pakistan to have operations to make them look less "Muslim" and to have their body hair eradicated.

In China, Japan and Korea thousands of women have eye-widening surgery and some are now opting for excruciating and dangerous leg extensions. Indian actresses once were all shapes and colours. Now top Bollywood female stars are pale and have green or light brown eyes (or contact lenses).

Why is this happening now when India, Brazil and China are set to be the big economic engines of the world? So much of the media is embracing the new world, and today's most popular TV programmes, especially reality shows, feature a cornucopia of racial types. Yet "ethnic" psychosis persists and is manifestly getting worse.

On Asian marriage sites or matchmaking newspaper adverts, third-generation British Asian men want "wheaten" brides. In black communities western features are craved, hair is straightened, skin lightened for reasons profoundly disturbing. Jet gets herself a pointy, long nose. Now, she says, she looks rich enough to shop in Waitrose.

Back in the 1960s the Black is Beautiful movement in the US spread across the world and made us proud to be who we were, even in Kampala, Uganda where I was growing up. I stopped ironing my hair to look like Jean Shrimpton's, and my African college room-mates went Afro. No more burnt hair in the sink and a new dawn, we thought. For a few decades, yes. Now comes globalisation spreading Starbucks and standardised western notions, and with it a surge in "ethnic" self-loathing and self-mutilation.

What is different now is the absence of any political and social fightback. Race is dispensable, can be wiped out if you can pay for the privilege. Then what? Do Jet and Mun really think they will be good enough for the BNP? When, oh, when will we stop being our own worst enemies?

y.alibhai-brown@independent.co.uk

More from Yasmin Alibhai-Brown

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

The Colour of Life
[info]boeticia wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 01:28 am (UTC)
I've always wondered why some Caucasian people, both male and female, who vocally or secretly
look down on others, who, through their ethnic backgrounds are endowed with black, brown, or yellow (ish) skin tones - then are the very first to throw themselves down on some southern beach, to bake themselves for hours on end until they achieve the dark shades they despise on others.
I'm still wondering.............
Re: The Colour of Life
[info]john_roberts55 wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 02:10 am (UTC)
This is such a wild generalization. I am a white person who has an Asian Wife. I and all of my friends, as far as I can tell, do not believe non 'Caucasian' people to be any more or less beautiful in their features. It is voices from within my wife's culture that are telling her to put on skin treatment creams to try and make herself lighter and it has nothing to do with my culture. Maybe there is a link in the past but I think in my situation, it has more to do with the history of the Indian Subcontinent and the historical distribution of wealth and power within that region. This is intensified by Bollywood and advertising. When another one of my friends was born in a Bangladeshi village he was covered in powder to make his skin look paler before he was shown to the village. When my wifes sister had a baby the first thing that was reported was not its gender but its skin colour.
Re: The Colour of Life
[info]andrea_2 wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 09:07 am (UTC)
You need to read the article again. It is not white people who are looking down on people with darker skin, it is, as the article says, Black and Asian communities who put pressure on themselves to have lighter skin. Yasmin uses the example of the woman from Banglagesh, who hates her 'toffee skin' because her in-laws think she is too dark for their ligter coloured son.

Most white people, and I'm one of them, admire darker skin and that is why, as you quite rightly say, they cook themselves on beaches to get a tan. Dark skin is attractive.

Skin colour is obviously an issue within Black and Asian communities and saying it is because of white people is an easy cop-out. I watched a programme on Race in America a couple of years back and was taken aback to discover that a lot of lighter skinned African Americans openly despise darker skinned African Americans, with some lighter skinned Black people saying that they would not consider marrying darker skinned Black people.

Re: The Colour of Life
[info]andre_t wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 02:08 pm (UTC)
no and yes, I would say the skin-issue stigma that was and still is tranferred from some white people to the darker skinned, who now apply the same criteria - not an excuse, and should know better
Re: The Colour of Life
[info]boeticia wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 10:42 am (UTC)
My first comment was not meant to offend, far from it. I was aware of the theme of the author's article,
I meant to point out that, conversely, from the perspective of some race-conscious Caucasians, other peoples' ethnic colour is considered by such colour-conscioius Caucasians as even inferior to theirs.
Therefore my bewilderment at some white people going through great efforts to achieve a deep sun tan, which is paradoxical to their attitude towards colour. In my opinion, this fact also has a relevance
to what Ms Alibhai-Brown writes about ethnic people's self-consciousness concerning their colour.
There was no intent on my part to generalize, and apologise for the misunderstanding.
And I agree wholeheartedly that Asian and African women (and men), are some of the most good-looking people in the world....and most charming!!!
Re: The Colour of Life
[info]slaveweknow wrote:
Friday, 13 November 2009 at 04:09 pm (UTC)
Muslims do not have colour discrimination.

If they do ;they do not represent is Islam.
Why self hatred?
[info]jadroo wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 05:36 am (UTC)
The problem is in your mind!! The most beautiful women I have seen in my travels are the Vietnamese and they are followed closely by the Thais and Chinese.
Re: Why self hatred?
[info]moodyman88 wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 08:07 am (UTC)
Yet again, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown is a long-way from the truth.

John Roberts has it nailed. In South Asian society, a person is judged to be prettier the fairer his/her skin colour. The first thing they talk about is how light/dark a new baby's skin colour is.

There are numerous Asian skincare companies that specialise in creams that appear to make one's face lighter. As is in all societies, these are aimed squarely at women.



[info]andre_t wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 08:16 am (UTC)
from childhood onwards the non-white (better than using non Caucasian since Indians are also Caucasians) people of this world are influenced by the media on right (fair) or wrong (dark), beauty standards and more subliminal messages as who is socially desirable and who is not. TV ads, serials, magazines continuously pump put the messages until its ingrained in those people who should actually disregard their own segregation.

At least in the non-white areas of the world, the peoples should influence the media on the content, and not elevate "white" and themselves down. In South East Asia a TV add with Brad Pitt driving their locally produced car was canceled, as the prime minister said we have our own role models and don not need a western face. Chavez has banned job adds referring to "socially desirable appearance", which means having a fair and European complexion, essentially carving out jobs just for the small portion of white people (common in Latin America)

Now from my understanding, I cannot say that Africans, Arabs or the people of the sub continent are without blame. There always has been a strong colour bias within the populations, with north Indians looking down on east or south Indians, higher castes looking down on lower castes much to do with the colour of skin. Yes, the colour or complexion bias exist in the indigenous European populations, e.g. with north Italians dismissing south Italians.


The examples are endless
[info]mortysmith wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 09:43 am (UTC)
I've heard that nightclubs with a mostly black clientele often have a rule that light skinned girls get in free, since they know they will bring in the guys in droves. Of course, this doesn't prove they're preferred because they look more like caucasian women. But it's hard not to be reminded of the Belgian colonial authorities dividing the Rwandan population into two artificial groups – Hutu (darker skinned, wider noses) and Tutsi (lighter skinned, more European noses) and giving the Tutsis preferential treatment.

I remember also that Iman's success as the first black supermodel was derided by some because as a Somali she had what they considered European features.
"White" is the mutation
[info]larkspur_14 wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 10:16 am (UTC)
Go back far enough and all our grandparents were black.
Racism as fashion
[info]rufusred wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 10:44 am (UTC)
Unsurprisingly, YAB chooses to ignore another very real, though admittedly un-PC, form of racism: the idiotic, cruel and fully racist prejudice against white skin. I am blond/red-haired ‘Nordic’ and throughout my life has been criticised and laughed at for the colour of my white skin. Comments referring to my need to get some sun, about looking sickly, pastey-faced, or milky-man are not only common but raise not an eyebrow amongst those who (claim) to be horrified by racism. People feel quite entitled to make derogatory comments about my skin colour. Yet this is the same thing. Any judgment which in which people look at the colour of your skin, decide it is wrong and needs changing, is a racist one. Full stop.
The most serious side of this can be seen all to clearly in the enormous rise in skin diseases, all the way to cancers and fatal melanomas, in this and all societies where the imbecilic pursuit of a brown skin by white people, and the pressures to do so, is so ingrained. The issue raised in the article is important, but please YAB, a tad less disingenuity and monothematism, and a real understanding of racism would strengthen your case.
Re: Racism as fashion
[info]andre_t wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 11:14 am (UTC)
"I am blond/red-haired ‘Nordic’ and throughout my life has been criticised and laughed at for the colour of my white skin"

..who critised you for your looks, white or darker skinned people
Re: Racism as fashion
[info]rufusred wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 12:03 pm (UTC)
Both.
Re: Racism as fashion
[info]chouenlai wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 01:48 pm (UTC)
'@ RUFUS RED
Its the white mans burden Rufe. I have often wondered how anyone who hails from the Indian sub continent, can critisise anyone else regarding "racism". I have heard the stories from grand fathers and great uncles about the wicked cruelty (based on race) despensed by one Indian to another in the 20s and 30s. My son was a Tsunami volunteer in 05 and nothing has changed. Every novel about India I have ever read makes great issue about higher class Hindu's wanting a "pale" wife or husband. I dont know where madame gets the front to write the anti white, anti English, clap trap she does.
Re: Racism as fashion
[info]andre_t wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 02:11 pm (UTC)
Point it our please, where in the text is the anti white anti English message
The colour of life
[info]montage_100 wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 11:32 am (UTC)
The complexion of a person's skin and their good looks has always mattered throughout history. It isn't something that's come about simply because a large number of non Europeans migrated to the West in the last 50 years. Indian or Iranian women have always been known for their beauty. Many are fair complexioned, an attribute that has been valued in those socities for thousands of years, during times when the most powerful global empires existed in Asia. Most Chinese or Japanese people are fair complexioned, and always have been, without the need of any lightening lotions. I can understand what Alibhai-Brown might be trying to say, but she does need to research into the subject a little more rather than arriving at biased and lop sided conclusions. Perhaps she can start by going through Mughal and Chinese art and paintings of a few hundred years ago.
Re: The colour of life
[info]boeticia wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 02:09 pm (UTC)
In Asia, in the Far East to be exact, women use sun parasols so that they don't get tanned. Their norm of beauty is keeping a fair skin, and only foreigners living in their countries were seen sunning.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, it seems.

In monarchichal Europe, the women of the aristocracy kept out of the sun, as it wasn't "genteel" to get tanned. Only working-class women who had to work outdoors did, and so one can surmise that it was out of class snobbery and social class differences that that attitude was prevalent in those times.
Up in the sky
[info]sharifl wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 11:39 am (UTC)
Our society is modeled to prefer whites. It is tolerable if this divide is us against them, but it becomes a tragedy if one of 'us' becomes, or wants to become 'them'. If your daughter or son happens to have a lighter skin and marries a still lighter skinned spouse. You notice that his/her preference to 'them' and you feel hurt. He is more close to 'them' and avoids introducing others to you.
You say, my god why have you made us dark? Is there any fairness in Your world? We are being ignored and treated 2nd rate, by our own kith and kin?
It hurts.
[info]arupos wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 12:24 pm (UTC)
Don't agree with this I'm afraid. I'm an Asian man, and in my experience, women from the sub-continent use skin lightening products as a result of pressures in their own culture. In many respects, its not so hard to understand and its not really that sinister.

Regardless of where you come from, there is an inherant human tendency to look different, to appear exotic. Just ask all of the orange girls that come out of tanning booths in places like Wales and Newcastle. No one ever suspects these girls of being embroiled in some kind of racial confusion. Everyone just figures that they just want to look like Beyonce or Cheryl Cole. And why not. In the same way, women of colour mostly just want to look like people that are exotic to them, i.e. white people. The don't want to 'become white'. Thats completely different. Adding all these connotations of race and inferiority is utter rubbish.
Connotations perceived or not
[info]boeticia wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 02:17 pm (UTC)
As long as racism exists in our societies, like notoriously in the U.S., I'm afraid that it will continue to be an issue, whether we like it or not. We can only hope to eradicate it by better understanding of other peoples' cultures, or better still, a complete overhaul of false attitudes.
Re: Connotations perceived or not
[info]jadroo wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 03:31 pm (UTC)
Boeticia I think you have completely missed the points being made here. It has nothing to do with racism or false attitudes. It is a perception of beauty and as some people have pointed out, it's a pre-dates any contact between white Europeans and other darker skinned peoples.
Re: Connotations perceived or not
[info]boeticia wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 10:11 am (UTC)
I agree with you that the article was all about perception of beauty in various cultures, especially those of Asia. You added that the conception of beauty norms pre-dates that which had taken place between white Europeans and darker-skinned peoples. How far back in time does one pre-date? We cannot tell how attitudes were in the Stone Age, and after that because there are no records existing as to how peoples of different cultures perceived each other's appearance, and skin colour. I am not aware of any book yet written by anthropologists or paleologists on that subject. Hard to tell because how can one possibly know? I suppose we can surmise that Europeans and other peoples found out when their paths met, during the colonizations of nations in different continents.
Re: Connotations perceived or not
[info]jadroo wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 10:35 am (UTC)
Look at Hindu and Japanese paintings that pre-date contact with Europeans for example. Attractive women are given lighter colour skin.
Also the Hindu caste system..lighter skinned peoples on the upper castes and darker as one goes down. Having said that, my latter point might support your statement that that there is racism at work.
[info]yahew111 wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 01:42 pm (UTC)
What is really appalling is the way the racist works in reverse. how many pasty faced white Irish type red haired people do you see in advertisements? Is that what the racist hegemony is forcing the befreckled masses of Ireland to turn orange, a form of Mediterranean/ Oompa Loompa cultural imperialism? American is less hostile to red heads, go figure.

As for the Asian fetish for ligher skin, since it precedes contact with Europeans, it can t really be blamed on the Yurups. I blame We As A Society.

Who are the Causcaians by the way? An Asian group? A boy band?
[info]bothered_again wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 02:21 pm (UTC)
I'm with a number of the other respondents. As a Scottish / Irish mix, I get continual - by this I mean daily - comments on my pale complexion. My wife, of Indian descent, half-jokingly asserts that if she suffered as much she'd have made a nice living by suing employers for 'skin-tone bias'.

The whole pale skin thing really hit home in my many years living in India, Malaysia, China and Japan. In each of these countries, friends, colleagues and complete strangers would longingly ask how I kept so pale. My experience in these cultures wasn't an aspiration to be caucasian, but an aspiration to be pale to show that they didn't do manual work. An outward display of wealth.

It very much reminds me of the UK's own perspective on this 100 years ago - being pale again was perceived as showing you were wealthy as you didn't work in the fields. From what I understand this only changed in the 60s when a tan showed you could afford a holiday overseas. All in all then the same across cultures, i.e. a show of wealth, not a expression of a desire to be a different race.

For once, it would be nice to read something that didn't try to racialise everything under the skin-darkening sun.
Hmmm.. What can the Witch Finder turn into a race issue this week?
[info]typhoon1 wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 07:49 pm (UTC)
YAB, YAB, YAB... You must wake from your slumber every day in deep thought as to what you can turn into a race issue.

'Let's see shall we' , you might say as you spoon cornflakes past your forked, White-hating tongue...'How about writing an article on how common it is for evil white people to sneer at mixed relationships?' 'Oh, no.. I'd have to mention honour killings, wouldn't I?'

'I know! I'll write about how non-white people are trying to make themselves look white!'

'Oh.. Hang on... It seems that White people are just as unhappy about their bodys as everyone else'

*taps away on google with her talons* 'Oh bugger... I seem to have found evidence of this rather easily'

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601102&sid=a1GKKBNOg.ok&refer=uk

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2009/05/10/survey-reveals-shocking-extent-of-steroid-use-in-young-welsh-men-91466-23585346/

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/the-rise-and-rise-of-male-vanity-761782.html


'I know.. I'll just ignore it... Shame, as I was probably going to blame the whole thing on the White working class men'

------


YAB, You've made a fantastic fortune in playing the role of Witch Finder General, but some things really don't have a racial element to them... You see, people have always wanted to look different, even before they ever saw a White person. I don't need to explain that pale skin equals wealth in Asia or the Orient, because you already know it. Everybody does.

This is a simple issue that trancends race or culture and belongs to the same discussion as that that surrounds eating disorders, Body Dismorphia, sunbed abuse and the need to Keep Up With The Joneses.

Unfortunately for you there really isn't a race issue for you to be writing about, No matter how you try and spin it, so I'll ask you to kindly go back to spouting the same old anti-white racism that earned you your fortune, so that I may delight in shooting it down.

Is it really ethnicity?
[info]seena_5 wrote:
Monday, 2 November 2009 at 10:30 pm (UTC)
While the aim of this article is noble, you should consider that many of the physical traits you are attributing to 'whiteness' save the lighter complexion itself, are reflections of lifestyle/socioeconomic class/environment/education levels. Now it just so happens, for whatever reason, just or unjust, that economic prosperity is monopolized largely by the lighter skinned people of the world. This does not however mean, that a black, asian or any other woman (or man) cannot develop these same healthy traits if their lifestyles are more active, granted that what they consume is more healthy (organic!), the environment they are exposed to (drinking water, air pollution) is cleaner, and if their overall economic opportunity is improved. There may be great global injustices towards every shade darker than 'white', however this is hardly one of them.

Believe it or not, beauty truly is a matter of health. I have seen many Asian/black/et cetera women, who are conventionally gorgeous, and their lifestyle has always seemed to reflect those with modern "Western" privilege. Once again, I believe you are mistakenly attributing features that are the result of many other circumstances, to non-whites.
self hatred
[info]lalitbagai wrote:
Thursday, 5 November 2009 at 12:48 pm (UTC)
yasmin is in deep shit.

she complains about everything.

this is her latest.

i am indian, and look like one- a bit fairer then most.

i like european women and think some of them are gorgeous.
my wife -danish-certainly is. however i am attracted to oriental,
indian women too.the same for food. i like indian and also
french,chinese.

now i consider this end of story. i would like to look
handsomer, but i am not planning surgery.

yasmin needs to drink more red wine, and listen to
good music. smile and laugh a bit more. and for heavens
sake stop feeling sorry for herself .
Self Hate - Black Skin
[info]sharonan wrote:
Saturday, 7 November 2009 at 02:02 am (UTC)
The idealisation of white skin may have been so for the Indian culture for thousands of years but what I think YAB is saying and I do agree with is that now in a time of economic and technological growth having whiter skin still is craved. For Indians the caste system with the dark skinned as low caste is burnt deep into the psyche and the light skinned idealised. These preferences are not being tackled via the media instead this desire is reflected in every modern bollywood film.

The colour of the skin has in India/Pakistan been a barrier to or an asset to success and having a dark skinned baby still carries shame in these societies. Why don't the film makers and media industry address this hate of blackness. Why don't they transform this hate into a celebration of the deeper tones - these educated media magnates. It's because if they don't feed this craving they would not be tapping into the collective unconscious of white skin envy.
To watch the white blue eyed bollywood stars taps into the desire/envy to be the white ideal objects and perpetuates the cycle self-hate and the caste system- bollywood is the caste system on screen - old habits die hard. I would be happy to campaign against these practices to media moguls if you want to YAB.

Columnist Comments

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: Roll up for the great emissions-fest

Do world leaders believe what they say about the imminence of disaster?

mary_dejevsky

Mary Dejevsky: World leadership is an outdated hope

The EU did not want a traffic-stopping standard-bearer

john_walsh

John Walsh: Born and bred a Brit...

...but apparently I know nothing about Britishness


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion