Leading Articles

8° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

Leading article: The repressive reality behind China's modern mask

The massacre in Urumqi demonstrates how little has changed

Something terrible has happened in Urumqi. The Chinese state media says 140 people were killed and more than 800 injured in clashes between police and protesters in the capital of Xinjiang province at the weekend. Uighur groups claim the death toll is significantly higher. Beijing says the local authorities suppressed an anti-Han Chinese pogrom. The Uighurs claim the police fired indiscriminately on peaceful protesters. Whichever narrative is closer to the truth, there is little doubt that this constitutes the bloodiest official crackdown in China since Tiananmen Square 20 years ago.

According to some reports, the trigger for these protests was a fight between Uighur migrant workers and Han Chinese in the city of Shaoguan in south-eastern China last month. But Beijing has accused Uighur groups based overseas of orchestrating the attacks as part of a separatist campaign of terror. This is a familiar tune. Ever since the 11 September attacks on the US in 2001, Beijing has sought to present the Muslim Uighurs as allied to al-Qa'ida and other international Islamist terror groups. There is clearly a separatist movement in Xinjiang, as the sporadic attacks on government targets since the early 1990s demonstrates. But China has produced no evidence of a connection between the Uighur independence movement and foreign terror groups. Moreover, Beijing can hardly be considered an innocent party when it comes to the relations with the Uighurs.

It is true that there has been significant economic development in Xinjiang in recent years. The province's large cities have grown wealthier as development money from Beijing has poured in. But within the velvet glove of economic aid from the Communist Party has been the iron fist of cultural suppression.

Four years ago, Human Rights Watch released a comprehensive report detailing how Beijing undermines Uighur culture and restricts religious freedom in the province. It uncovered Communist Party documents that instruct local officials to forbid the celebration of religious holidays and prevent children from taking part in religious activities. It reported that thousands of political dissidents have been jailed, and that process has accelerated since the report was published. The Old City in Kashgar, an exemplar of the traditional Uighar way of life in Xinjiang, is being demolished, and the pace of Han immigration has increased. Uighurs now constitute a minority in Urumqi.

Beijing has used the same techniques in Tibet, where authorities have encouraged the migration of tens of thousands of Han Chinese, curbed Tibetan Buddhist culture and accused the Dalai Lama, without proof, of orchestrating violent rebellion from abroad. Like the Tibetan plateau, Xinjiang has strategic importance for Beijing. The province is China's largest natural gas producing region and is rich in minerals.

Twenty years after the Communist leadership sent in tanks to crush student protests in Tiananmen, we have a graphic reminder that the Chinese government will brook no challenges to its authority. Despite two decades of rapid economic development and an unprecedented opening up to the rest of the world, China has confirmed that it remains a repressive autocracy intolerant of cultural diversity within its borders and prepared to use extreme force against its own people.

Much has changed in China in 20 years. But much, sadly, also remains the same.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Stop China
[info]zened wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 12:15 am (UTC)
Go ahead buy some more kitsch that has "made in China" written on it. Support the oppression until it comes to a city or country near you.

Doing business in China is effectively treason if you come from a democracy. The Chinese will brush away democracy in other countries more swiftly than in their own. When it comes to buying "made in China" Caveat Emptor.

It is the Chinese who alone support the North Korean maniacs now threatening nuclear war on Japan, South Korea and the US. The Chinese keep the murderers in Sudan in power so they can continue their genocide in Darfur. The Chinese keep Mugabe in power in Zimbabwe. Look at Tibet! The Chinese also took over Nepal with Maoists.

Any EU or US form importing from China should face a three hundred per cent Dictator Importation tax! Do business in Brazil or India and stop selling out the future of your children. Chinese power will end our species their political system is murderous and barbaric. If you do business with China you are helping them. China can not survive without democratic markets and technology.

Stop China and stop it now!

Re: Stop China
[info]zened wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 12:19 am (UTC)
4th Paragraph should read "Any EU or US firm.."

Sorry for the typo my sub-editor is on holiday in Tehran.

:)
Who tells the truth?
[info]johnchen wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 03:20 am (UTC)
Much has changed in China in 20 years. But nothing, sadly, has changed of Western media's eyes on China
Re: Who tells the truth?
[info]stewartpa wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 06:03 am (UTC)
If the basis of our views was just the western media you could have a point. However there are many other sources that have a pan global base such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. Also I do not believe that western media should be dismissed off-handedly. That is just jingoistic superior spin. Yes, the media does spin, but it doesn't often get the basic facts wrong. Let's keep our blindfolds off and concentrate on the facts.
Living in China
[info]orangiey wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 06:31 am (UTC)
I recently returned to Europe after having the 'opportunity' to live and work in China and I am saddened by the things I saw there. The schools teach intolerance and hatred of non han Chinese at an age of 6 and 7. This is the norm. You see so much money in the new rich but the majority of people live hand to mouth and this new money doesn't go to the everyday person on the street. Not the principle of Carl Marx? It's a poor country and the press aren't allowed to report these everyday happenings, of the groups of unskilled labourers standing on the street every morning hoping to be selected for a day's work, contruction, road building, what ever they get from the passers by in their mercs etc. And you wonder why roads collapse and schools fall down.? No wonder the majority are frustrated, they are made that way. Read 1984, it's so near the truth...Knowledge is power, freedom is slavey etc etc..
Leading article: The repressive reality behind China's modern mask
[info]famulla wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 04:23 pm (UTC)
The schools teach intolerance and hatred of non han Chinese at an age of 6 and 7. This is the norm. Why you are against the UK policies?
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
[info]fredscribe1 wrote:
Wednesday, 8 July 2009 at 03:38 pm (UTC)
It doesn't matter how repressive China is, no one in the West will argue with them and the big menace will - and, for tactical purposes, must remain - Iran. Hillary Clinton made it clear on her visit to China that, if one may paraphrase, trade was more important than human rights. That such a statement could have been made at all in the world after the horrors of Pol Pot, Auschwitz, Dresden, and Guantanamo beggars belief; but realpolitik supposes that a nation and its leaders does not possess a conscience. Articles about China's human rights record and how abominable it is, and so on are merely wastes of paper. Nothing will be done. No pressure exerted. Israel continues, meanwhile, to carry out acts of piracy on the high seas while Egypt, in God knows what sort of devil's bargain with Israel, is continuing to stop relief aid getting to Gaza.
Like all Chinese, the Uighurs want to rebel
[info]londonrebel wrote:
Thursday, 9 July 2009 at 08:54 am (UTC)
Most Chinese like to point to favourable government policies towards the Uighurs (easier university entrance, exemption from one-child policy) as proof of their essential ungratefulness, saying there is no reason they should be unhappy. What they fail to examine is the politically powerless cultural isolation these people inhabit. Most Han Chinese also know the total power and corruptability of the CCP and its other tools - mass censorship and determination to keep Western freedoms (free speech, information, rule of law) at bay. The Uighurs get all of this as well so they are also fighting not just for basic respect and full cultural recognition, but the repressive social and political environment that the CCP created and manages to this day. Han Chinese disgust at the Uighur's right to have more than one child is a classic divide and rule situation. Such people should criticise the government for imposing such an insane and disastrous policy in the first place; but we all know the government cannot be criticised in China, so they attach those who can have more than one child instead (jealousy arising from curtailed freedoms - here the most basic freedom, to reproduce). As one Uighur was quoted as saying - the Han Chinese don't look Uighurs in the eye; they are looked down upon, have no stake in the development of Xinjiang or China, are being marginalised in their homeland and their culture slowly extinguished; on top of which they have to endure the social repression that the Chinese government imposes on all of its citizens, a repression against which most Chinese also want to rebel against, but lack the means to do so. That is the root cause of the violence in Urumqi and labelling them as terrorists is just another red herring that will come back to roost (if red herrings could roost).

Columnist Comments

matthew_norman

Matthew Norman: Nightmare on Palin St

It is her status as the apotheosis of reality televison that explains her popularity

adrian_hamilton

Adrian Hamilton: Chilcot and the truth

Those who think the establishment a myth should look to the inquiry's membership

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: Let the men eat cake (and have a chat)

One of the exhausting things about being a woman is that there's no brief answer to that social stalwart: "How are you?"


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion