2015 Cricket World Cup: If England are to shine, they must start winning the key moments in games - Nick Knight


Click to follow
The Independent Online

Can England really win this World Cup or is that simply wishful thinking? Certainly they are better placed now to make a genuine challenge than a month ago. The selectors have made two good and brave decisions in replacing Alastair Cook as captain with Eoin Morgan and opening the batting with Ian Bell.

Morgan has a one-day pedigree unrivalled in the England set-up. Bell enjoys the extra pace that southern hemisphere pitches provide and is a perfect foil for the more flamboyant Moeen Ali. Since his elevation, Bell has batted with great clarity, not  giving his wicket away if the tempo of his innings has dropped. In the past he has been guilty too often of trying to hit his way out of trouble.

The fact that England reached the recent Tri-Series final against Australia would have been beyond expectation, achieved as it was by two solid victories against India. But just as importantly there were also encouraging  moments against Australia.

On the cusp of recent World Cup campaigns, England have been confused and uncertain of their best line-up. Not this time. Going into their warm-up games they have been able to tinker with the team as they have decided on their favoured XI. There is a shade of uncertainty only about Ravi Bopara’s position.

There is much to be heartened by, but winning games of cricket is not always about having the best team. It is often the side that identifies and wins the important moments in a game. The reality is that England have won just six of their last 20 games.

Success breeds self-belief and confidence, attributes that are needed when games get tight and could go either way. Hence, my only real concern about England’s challenge.

England coach Peter Moores leads his side out to train

In the three recent Tri-Series games against Australia, England manoeuvred themselves into winning positions twice, with the bat in Hobart and then with the ball in the final at Perth. Thanks to Bell and Joe Root, England were on target for a probable winning score of 350 in the former match but instead fell away in the last 10 overs to reach a below-par 303.

In the final in Perth England’s pace attack ripped into Australia’s top order taking four quick wickets. Australia recovered to post a plus-par score of 278. Game over.

England’s inability to seize the key moment cost them both games. Their immediate task then is to compete for the full game not sections of it. It is these crucial passages that leave England fallible and make champions out of sides like Australia and India.

By now England know they can compete against the best sides in the world but what remains uncertain is whether they have yet learned to do it when it really matters. It is a problem of which unfortunately I have first-hand knowledge, for it afflicted the England one-day side I played in. You would look around the dressing room and see all these world-class players, yet when it came to big global tournaments we hardly competed. We did not win regularly enough to engender a winning spirit and although it’s sad to say so, did not really understand how to win. The loss to Australia in Port Elizabeth in 2003 is a perfect example. It was match England were winning, should have won, yet lost.

This team can improve on previous campaigns. It is a tough start against arguably the tournament favourites Australia, though the injury to James Faulkner is a big loss to the hosts as he has become so dependable at the end of the innings with bat and ball.

If England can get through the new-ball burst from the Mitchells, Johnson and Starc, as well as Josh Hazlewood, the Australians’ weakness would be exposed. Their fifth and sixth bowling options can be exploited with wickets in hand.

England’s only selection concern is Bopara. I would not change the top six at this late stage so would not consider Alex Hales or Gary Ballance at seven. Chris Jordan is an option but I would prefer the extra batting and a few overs from Bopara. England settled on the experience of Bell and for now should employ the same rationale with Bopara.

The bowling is heavily reliant on pace and should have helpful pitches. There remain questions about England’s ability to hold a side in the last 10 overs – though, that’s not a problem that besets only England.

The question the team really needs to ask itself is this:  have they got the ability to win those three or four game-changing moments that will arise in the next six weeks. If the answer is yes, then glory beckons, if it’s no, an early flight home is awaiting yet again.



Kane Williamson (New Zealand)

An excellent batting technique with an ability to read a game situation. The perfect foil for more aggressive Kiwi players around him.

Mitchell Starc (Australia)

Starc bowling at 145kmh with a new white ball that swings is a lethal combination. Also bowls excellent yorkers at the end of the innings.

James Anderson (England)

Has shown exemplary control of the swinging ball since his return to the side. One of the most feared bowlers in the one-day game.

Calum MacLeod (Scotland)

The Scot is one of the most exciting prospects among the associate sides. A powerful top-order player, he started as a bowler and could finish as a classy attacking batsman.

Hashim Amla (South Africa)

A high-class Test player, so will be able to cope with differing conditions throughout a long World Cup. A batting giant in one of the fancied sides, South Africa.