England vs India second Test: MCC groundsman’s drag act inspires sweeping criticism
Second Test clouded in pitch controversy after groundstaff member Shane Doherty appeared to drag his foot down the line of leg stump
Saturday 19 July 2014
MCC were forced to apologise and defend the conduct of a member of their groundstaff after Kevin Pietersen drew attention to his method of sweeping the pitch at lunch.
Shane Doherty, who is part of head groundsman Mick Hunt’s team at Lord’s, appeared to drag his right foot down the line of leg stump as he tidied the wicket in preparation for the afternoon session.
Doherty’s work attracted the attention of Sky Sports’ commentators and Pietersen was moved to post a video on social media, captioned with the remark “Unbelievable” – followed, in customary KP fashion, by seven exclamation marks.
David Millns, the fourth umpire, approached Doherty quickly to inform him of his error. An MCC spokesman said on Twitter that it was “a genuine, honest mistake, and there was no intent to damage the pitch”.
Pietersen appeared to disagree. “He knew what he was doing,” he wrote on Twitter, while former England captain Michael Vaughan described the incident as “a little sniffy”. However, there is no suggestion that either of them had any evidence to back up their opinions.
Pietersen was effectively sacked by England in February but he has made regular observations on Twitter about the team’s performances in the five months since that decision was made.
Indian cricket sources indicated that there would be no complaint from the team, although the final decision would rest with the captain, MS Dhoni, and his players. Whatever the explanation – and there is no reason to believe Doherty was anything other than careless – it was another talking point in a series that has already had plenty of them.
On Tuesday a preliminary hearing will be held to examine James Anderson’s clash with Ravindra Jadeja on the second day of the First Investec Test at Trent Bridge.
The England fast bowler was charged with a level three offence, which means he could be banned for up to four Tests if the International Cricket Council’s judicial commission uphold India’s complaint that he was physically aggressive towards Jadeja.
Speaking on BBC Radio’s Test Match Special, the ICC’s chief executive, David Richardson, said: “The instructions have gone to the umpires to be stricter in that regard. If someone is swearing and saying the wrong things and that escalates into something physical, it needs to be looked at.
“If there’s someone who’s guilty, he deserves to be punished. When people take it off the field, that is where we should really be very strong in drawing the line.
“We would like the focus to be on cricket, not on disciplinary-type issues. For example, I don’t think the behaviour in last winter’s Ashes series was particularly good.”
England’s case is that India have exaggerated the incident in the hope that Anderson will be removed from the series. The Third Test is due to start on Sunday at Southampton.
The muddy truth of the Christmas Truce game
Premier League: Chelsea vs West Ham match preview
Sir Alex Ferguson on Jose Mourinho: 'He's good looking, speaks five languages, wins everything - it's unfair'
The best sport selfies of 2014
Jose Mourinho on Sir Alex Ferguson: 'A good friend, a good person, a fantastic sense of humour. I like him very, very much'
- 1 Planes go hybrid-electric in important step to greener flight
- 2 Christmas comes early to Hong Kong, as millions of bank notes spill out onto busy street
Nigel Farage defends Kerry Smith 'ch***y' comment: 'If you are going for a Chinese, what do you say you’re going for?'
British actor Idris Elba cannot star as James Bond because he is black, says shock jock Rush Limbaugh
Rozanne Duncan: Ukip expels councillor for 'jaw-dropping' comments made in BBC TV interview
Germany anti-Islam protests: 17,000 march on Dresden against 'Islamification of the West'
Ukip member gets into Christmas spirit with Union Flag plea to Santa 'for our country back'
Panic Saturday: 13 million Britons spend £1.2bn – while 13 million others across the country live in poverty unable to afford food