Strauss in line for captain's job over thriving Flintoff
Wednesday 17 January 2007
Andrew Flintoff or Andrew Strauss, who should it be? Michael Vaughan's hamstring injury means that England will need to find a new captain for Friday's one-day encounter against Australia in Brisbane, and in all likelihood for the remainder of the Commonwealth Bank Series.
Mild hamstring strains usually take a minimum of two to three weeks to heal and should the scan on Vaughan's left leg show any damage he will be advised to rest, a decision that will almost certainly rule him out of the rest of the tournament.
The person who takes charge will be leading a team that is deprived of several of its leading players. Injury, illness and family problems have seen Kevin Pietersen, Marcus Trescothick and Ashley Giles return home and Vaughan could follow them.
Continuity, a trait that England like to show, would see Flintoff captain England again. The selectors were loath to criticise the all-rounder at the end of the Ashes whitewash, but it would be wrong to give it back to him.
Flintoff was asked at a press conference whether he would be interested in doing the job again. In attempting to move the questioning on he said: "I've enjoyed my day today." His comments suggested that he did not want a good day spoilt by the subject that has brought him a huge amount of heartache over the past ten weeks.
It is not a coincidence that Flintoff's form and demeanour have improved since the captaincy was taken away from him. There has been freshness about his cricket in the past week that was absent during the Ashes. The shackles have been released and Flintoff is beginning to play the type of cricket that made him a national treasure in 2005.
It was there in Hobart yesterday as he brilliantly guided England to a narrow but deserved victory. He bowled with hostility, skill and energy. He batted with intelligence and discipline during his match-winning innings of 72, too. Vaughan has encouraged Flintoff to have fun and it appears he is. And long may it continue.
The move would leave the position open to Strauss who, to me, has always been Vaughan's long-term successor. Strauss has a similar approach as Vaughan and would ensure that England's current planning and strategy would continue throughout the series. It would also allow England to get the best out of their most important player, something Flintoff was unable to do during the Ashes.
Vaughan should remain in Australia even if the injury prevents him from playing another game because he will captain the team, injury permitting, in the World Cup. There has been a purpose about England's cricket in its last two games and it has much to do with Vaughan. He, along with Duncan Fletcher, has devised the plans that England will use in the World Cup and he should be there to make sure they are adhered to.
Arsenal have no plans to stock Petr Cech inspired caps in club shops - yet
Petr Cech blasts Chelsea supporters who sent him death threats after £11m Arsenal transfer: 'They are not true fans'
Nathaniel Clyne joins Liverpool: Transfer news live - Arda Turan decision, Petr Cech reaction, Sergio Ramos to Manchester United
Christian Benteke to Liverpool: Aston Villa striker ready to reject Tottenham
Arda Turan announcement expected on Friday: Chelsea, Arsenal and Manchester United possible destinations
- 1 Tunisia hotel attack: Locals form 'human shield' to protect hotel from gunman Seifeddine Rezgui
- 2 Greece crisis: Alexis Tsipras accepts troika bailout proposals with conditions
- 3 German ethics council calls for incest between siblings to be legalised by Government
- 4 French woman dies in freak bungee jumping accident
- 5 Facebook rainbow profile pictures likely being tracked by social network
The moment a Queen's Guard soldier lost it and drew his gun at annoying tourist
Greece crisis: IMF was pushed around by Angela Merkel and Nicholas Sarkozy – and now it is being humiliated
Greece crisis: The wider lesson is that it’s time to abandon this failed experiment in currencies
'I wish the BBC would stop calling it Islamic State' – David Cameron unleashes frustration at broadcaster
Pentagon accuses Russia of 'playing with fire' over nuclear threats towards Nato
They are neither a 'state' nor 'Islamic': Why we shouldn't call them Isis, Isil or IS