Strauss's case puts DRS back on trial
England's travails were already significant when Andrew Strauss, their captain, was out yesterday. It was the worst possible start to their second innings and put the Umpire Decision Review System on trial again.
Under the regulation, both sides are allowed two reviews per innings, the number remaining intact if they are proved right. The confusion starts when it seems they are neither right nor wrong. When Strauss was adjudged to have touched a ball down the leg side to the wicketkeeper in the fifth over of England's innings yesterday he quickly consulted his partner, Alastair Cook and made the sign calling for it to be re-examined. The replays came and were quite inconclusive.
Hotspot, the ultra-red technology which uses heat to sense if there has been a touch, indicated a spot on Strauss's thigh pad. He might have been spared but there was no overwhelming evidence that it was the ball that touched the pad, or if it had, had not also touched glove or bat. Given that that there was insufficient evidence to prove Strauss innocent, as it were, the umpire Billy Bowden's original decision of guilty had to stand. As it had a little earlier when Saeed Ajmal was given out caught at short leg and was equally convinced the ball had not brushed his glove. It probably did not but Bowden had adjudged there was a touch and in the absence of irrefutable visual testimony the decision stood. This caused the usual debate but Strauss remains a supporter of DRS.
His point always is that it leads to fewer wrong decisions. It does not, however, eradicate them. He was candid enough to concede his dismissal did not alter events. Actually, it might have.
Umpires such as Bowden might like to reconsider their approach to the so-called leg side strangle. They are hard to judge because the bat is so often tangled up with pad or leg and the ball has often passed the batsman's body before contact is made. Sound is not the same as sight in these cases.
The skill of the third umpire is also important, too, since he relays the information. The shortcoming of DRS is that if a batsman feels he is not out he feels doubly betrayed. It is not perfect but then neither are umpires or cricketers.
Skype's the limit: Savvy Agnew hits the Pad
Jonathan Agnew came to the rescue when Test Match Special's coverage was hit by technical difficulties. The TMS team, led by the tech-savvy Agnew, Skyped their live commentary via an iPad.
Culinary experts in The Netherlands thought it was 'fresh' and 'tasty'
Anderlecht vs Arsenal match report: Kieran Gibbs and Lukas Podolski pounce as Arsenal leave it late
Liverpool fans applaud Cristiano Ronaldo after master-class for Real Madrid, despite his Manchester United ties
Liverpool vs Real Madrid player ratings: Was Cristiano Ronaldo the star man? And how did Mario Balotelli fare?
Liverpool vs Real Madrid match report: Cristiano Ronaldo and Karim Benzema run Reds ragged at Anfield
Mario Balotelli substituted at half-time against Real Madrid: Was shirt swapping the real reason?
- 1 Nokia no more: Microsoft drops once-ubiquitous mobile name – in favour of its Lumia brand
- 2 Renee Zellweger on plastic surgery: 'I'm living a more fulfilling life and I'm thrilled that perhaps it shows'
- 3 Jimmy Carr's controversial Oscar Pistorius joke goes too far at the Q Awards
- 4 Australian café owner sparks debate after saying 'No' to having unruly children on premises
- 5 NHS staff banned from drinking tea or coffee on the job because it looks like they're not working hard enough
Cameron is warned 'no possibility' of UK reducing immigration and that bid to bring in quota on migrant workers would be illegal
Of course, teenage girls need role models – but not like beauty vlogger Zoella
Support for EU membership 'at highest level since 1991' with most Brits wanting to stay 'in'
Residents should throw a street party and mix with immigrant neighbours, councils told
Russell Brand threatened with arrest after filming outside Fox News headquarters
Thousands with degenerative conditions classified as 'fit to work in future' – despite no possibility of improvement