Sam Wallace: Elite clubs seek to reinforce their closed shop at the top with new financial rules
Premier League clubs have agreed to financial constraints
There is one enormous question facing the Premier League, now they have voted not to spend all that lovely money from next season's broadcast deal on players' wages: what are they going to do with it?
If it is earmarked to reduce the cost of ticket prices, you could make a case for the new financial regulations. If it was to make football affordable for teenagers then it would be, in some respects, a laudable effort.
Yet, with an aim as unerring as Peter Odemwingie's satnav, the majority have voted for more money for themselves, with no prospect of the savings bringing down ticket prices.
It is about staunching the flow of money to players and their agents when the new £3bn deal kicks in next season and diverting it to owners and shareholders under the guise of protecting clubs. The clubs are sick of the brutal market place their own bitter rivalry has created and now they want to keep some of it for themselves.
The new rules forbid new owners from making losses in excess of £105m over three years and prevent them from increasing wage costs above a certain limit. The justification from the clubs is that it will avoid another basketcase like Portsmouth but it also forms a convenient block against another wealthy owner challenging the elite.
That means there will never be another Chelsea or Manchester City who will rise from relative mediocrity. For some that will be a blessing.
The flaw is that it is no longer possible for emergent clubs to develop a team capable of winning the championship. Derby County, Leeds United and Nottingham Forest won league titles having come up from the old Second Division. These days they would be filleted for players by the richest clubs before they got close.
By the richest we mean the clubs who generate the biggest revenues, in particular Manchester United and Arsenal, who are habitually the two most profitable English clubs, as well as Liverpool and Tottenham.
The alliance against them was a strange band of clubs. The "yes" lobby did not get the full 14 votes but Reading's bizarre abstention swung it in their favour.
But the question remains. What will happen to all that money saved by clubs from their next television deal?
There will be great play made of the new long-term sustainability of balance sheets. But fundamentally, clubs are taking money away from players and not passing on the benefit to fans.
There is nothing wrong with running a tight business model and refusing to pay over the odds. That is exactly what West Brom do, and they voted against the new rules because they do not believe that clubs should need legislation to keep their house in order.
As for the 13 clubs who voted for the new rules, it has taken them more than two decades of the Premier League to realise that they are far too profligate to stay in the black. Having recognised this new imperative, however, do not expect them to be generous with the money they save.
Diving in at the deep end is no excuse for shirking the style stakes
Latest in Sport
Luke Shaw arrives a week early for Manchester United pre-season training after cutting short post-World Cup holiday
World Cup 2014: The 50 best players of the World Cup
PornHub begs users to stop uploading video clips of Brazil getting beaten 7-1
Brazil vs Netherlands World Cup 2014: A history of the third-place play-offs
Brazil vs Netherlands World Cup 2014: Arrogant Brazilian team may never be forgiven by the fans
- 2 PornHub begs users to stop uploading video clips of Brazil getting beaten 7-1
- 3 Why I'm on the brink of burning my Israeli passport
- 4 L'Oreal cuts ties with Belgium supporter Axelle Despiegelaere after hunting trip photographs
- 5 The true Gaza back-story that the Israelis aren’t telling this week
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
War is war: Why I stand with Israel
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
Socialist Worker called to apologise over ‘vile’ article saying Eton schoolboy Horatio Chapple's death is ‘reason to save the polar bears’