Tottenham fans should not face action for use of the word 'Yid', says former FA chairman David Bernstein
A supporter was arrested at the weekend for using the word
Wednesday 09 October 2013
Tottenham supporters should not run the risk of prosecution every time they use the word 'Yid' in chants, according to former Football Association chairman David Bernstein.
Yid is a term for Jew which is often considered derogatory, but fans of the north London club chant the word as an act of defiance against those who taunt them because of their links with the Jewish community.
Bernstein, who is Jewish, finds the word offensive but can understand why Tottenham supporters have adopted it "almost as a badge of honour" and claims their right should remain.
Scotland Yard said supporters of Tottenham and West Ham could be arrested if they used the word during last Sunday's London derby at White Hart Lane, and one Tottenham fan was held on suspicion of committing a section five public order offence at half-time in the stadium's East Stand.
However, many Spurs supporters defied police advice and chanted "Yid army" before and during the match.
"If two or three people do something, you can prosecute them. If a number of thousands do it, it gets increasingly difficult," Bernstein said.
"Then you get into the question of what penalties should be incurred. Should a stand be closed down? Should a ground be closed down?
"That's where you end up, and I'm not saying that should be the case here because I do feel this is something that's done in a non-malicious way. There are extenuating circumstances.
"If the word is used in the way it is used by the crowds, in a sympathetic, inclusive way, almost as a badge of honour, I suppose I would be against prosecutions and I would tend to agree with the Prime Minister when he voiced similar views.
"When words like that are used maliciously it's a different matter altogether."
Bernstein, who stepped down as FA chairman this year after turning 70, said he has "agonised" over the use of the word.
"It's very offensive to many, including myself," he said on BBC Radio Five Live.
"Would I rather it wasn't used? Of course.
"So I suppose the question is: if an offensive word is used in what's meant to be an inoffensive way, does it make it any less hurtful?
"My view would be that I wish that it wasn't used. It would be better if it wasn't. It does upset people; it certainly upsets me.
"But in this particular case it's a rather special set of circumstances."
Latest in Sport
What time does Floyd Mayweather vs Manny Pacquiao begin and what channel is it on?
Floyd Mayweather vs Manny Pacquiao live: Mayweather puts on defensive masterclass to win by unanimous decision
What time does Floyd Mayweather vs Manny Pacquiao begin on Sky Sports Box Office?
Floyd Mayweather vs Manny Pacquiao: What time does the fight start and what channel is it on?
Floyd Mayweather vs Manny Pacquiao: Only 132 pubs in the United Kingdom will show the fight - so where can you watch it?
- 1 Which country would be hardest to invade?
- 2 The man who filmed the Freddie Gray video has been arrested at gunpoint
- 4 Floyd Mayweather's mouthguard costs $25,000 - enough to fly to Las Vegas and back 18 times
- 5 Royal baby girl born: Duchess of Cambridge's second child will be a princess thanks to Queen
Over 50,000 families shipped out of London boroughs in the past three years due to welfare cuts and soaring rents
EU asylum policy is 'a direct threat to our civilisation', says Nigel Farage
Indonesia executions live: 'Hysterical' families heard prisoners being shot dead by firing squad
General Election 2015: SNP and its activists 'openly racist' towards the English, Farage says
EU exit would hit UK economy much harder than neighbouring countries, study finds
General Election 2015: UK will be 'run for the wealthy and powerful' if Tories retain power, Labour warns