Benitez attacks Barry and City for feeding cash frenzy
Liverpool manager 'doubts passion' of the one who got away as he unveils Johnson
Reuters
Rafael Benitez presents the £18.5m full-back Glen Johnson as a Liverpool player at Anfield yesterday
Rafael Benitez yesterday launched a stinging attack on the England midfielder Gareth Barry for choosing Manchester City over Liverpool "just for money". Benitez, who has failed twice in his attempts to sign Barry, also said Javier Mascherano and Xabi Alonso were not for sale despite interest in them from Spain.
The Liverpool manager was in forthright mood on the occasion of Glen Johnson's introduction as the club's first major signing of the summer. Signed for £18.5m from Portsmouth, the England right-back is understood to have been fast-tracked into the highest earners at the club on a deal that is worth a staggering £120,000-a-week.
The vast salary offered to Johnson reflects Benitez's determination – some might say desperation – to ensure at least one high-profile signing ahead of City this summer after they signed Barry. Benitez tried and failed to sign Barry last summer, a transfer saga that turned into a squabble with Martin O'Neill who held firm at Aston Villa.
Barry's move to City came out of the blue last month and it meant that he also broke into the £100,000-a-week category. "Maybe it's just me but in this market now, money is not the main thing," Benitez said. "Everyone at this level earns big money. You have to enjoy [it], make decisions, do your best in the right way.
"If it's just for money sometimes you will make mistakes, like Gareth Barry. I won't say too much but it [his move to City] was clearly for money – 100 per cent. It's not a bad thing to miss out on him. The most important thing is to know the passion of the player.
"We did go back again for Barry, but as I said it is all about money, money, money. It is as simple as that. It was difficult, some clubs are offering big money. But he [Johnson] wanted to come here, that was the difference. City have signed a lot of good players, but that is no guarantee they will win anything. It will be interesting to see what happens next season."
Benitez was also adamant that Mascherano and Alonso would not be leaving despite intense interest in the pair from Barcelona and Real Madrid. Benitez said that, like Alvaro Arbeloa, also a target for Madrid, he expected the two midfielders to sign new contracts with the club – not least because they owed Liverpool a debt of loyalty.
"Both players are under contract and we are really pleased [with that]," he said. "We signed Alonso when nobody knew him outside Spain and renewed his contract two years ago, so he was happy, and with Mascherano you know the story about West Ham. Both players owe a lot to Liverpool football club and the fans like them, so we want to keep working with them. They owe the team their loyalty. They both know that.
"When you are in a top side, you can do it [tell players they are staying], so you have to decide about the way to do things but I don't have any problem. We have to be strong enough and if we have to be, we will be."
In the meantime, Steven Gerrard is expected to sign a two-year extension to his current deal, keeping him at the club until 2013. His wages are currently £100,000-a-week flat without bonuses and he was due to renegotiate a deal. However, Johnson's arrival on such attractive terms meant that the Liverpool captain and star player was due an improvement in his salary.
Benitez has said that he did not expect a "big-money signing" beyond the acquisition of Johnson, rather that he was more focused on keeping together a squad that only finished four points behind champions Manchester United last season. Benitez listed Gerrard among his strikers although beyond the captain, Fernando Torres and Dirk Kuyt, Liverpool have precious little cover. They have even recalled Andrei Voronin from his loan spell at Hertha Berlin.
On Johnson, Benitez said: "He was always thinking about Liverpool, so for us to sign a player who wants to come, an England international, with experience of a being at a big club before, is really good, because of his desire to be successful here.
"We knew we had to pay good money because he had good offers. We don't normally spend big money on defenders but he is a really important player, an offensive defender, an England player. We needed quality, someone with something more to stop [Liverpool getting too many] draws, another player to go forward and be a threat from the back."
Benitez said Fabio Aurelio's knee injury, sustained while playing with his son on holiday, will require only one month to heal. As for Johnson, he said he believed he could fulfil his potential at a "Big Four" club after struggling at Chelsea six years ago.
Johnson said: "It was working out until Jose Mourinho... wanted to bring in his own players. That's when it started to go downhill."
* Promoted Real Zaragoza have agreed to sign winger Jermaine Pennant from Liverpool on a three-year contract, the La Liga club said on their official website yesterday. The 26-year-old, who will move as a free agent, played part of last season on loan at Portsmouth.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
The Spaniard is correct to criticise certain individuals for leaving clubs for a paycheck rather than the passion that should drive all professional footballers. Gareth Barry is one of those players. He claimed to want to leave Aston Villa for 'Champion's League football', and yet the last I checked, Villa were a hell of a lot closer to the Champions League than Manchester City. I guess the lure of a 120k-a-week salary at the age of 29 proved too much for him.
Anyway, as far as what it will do to Liverpool's title prospects, I don't see it damaging them in the short or long term. The only downside is the fact that the player in question is English, and therefore could be registered for the very competition he claimed to want to 'play' in.
Btw, wasn't Beneitez supposed to be signing a world class forward as cover for Torres and Gerrard? He's a fool if he thinks he can win the league without one.
Liverpool are a club that live within their own means. They don't pump money into the club from elsewhere, whether that's from Russian petrodollars (Chelsea) or Middle Eastern petrodollars (Manchester City). The Alonso saga was indeed hard to swallow, but Benitez is ruthless when it comes to the knife (just ask Robbie Keane) and if he has a flaw it's in not treating players as pampered 'stars' like a certain red-nosed Scot. I personally, as a lifelong Liverpool fan, never wanted Alonso to leave, especially at the price he was valued at, but then again he did have a very poor season in 2007 (on account of the birth of his own child) and appeared, for all intents and purposes, 'broken' as a player.
Barry should at least have considered staying at Villa. Villa finished above City last season and this means that Villa will always be better than City for ever because last season freezes the relative position of the clubs for all time. Barry obviously does not understand this and therefore uniquely for a footballer he has signed a contract partly no doubt for money. This gives Benitez the right to publicly insult Barry at every opportunity especially as Liverpol players don't really get a salary just free board and a hire car, this is because all their players are just happy to play for the best club and biggest club in the world.
Benitez was the first manager from a 'top four' club to inquire about Barry's services, and was therefore the first to show the man he could play at the higher standard the Champion's League demands. He valued Barry far higher than the 12 million City paid for him last June, but his own director, Rick Parry, refused to sanction the sale.
The following season, after Barry publicly stated he would leave Villa if they failed to qualify for the Champions League (because he wanted to play in that competition), Barry became available for sale and Benitez once again offered him a contract.
Liverpool are in the Champions League. Manchester City are not. And yet Barry claimed he felt 'more wanted' by the team that didn't even mention his name prior to this summer, until they suggested he would earn more money than Steven Gerrard and would be in a team of (albiet currently disfunctional) super-stars.
It amuses me that you've painted this as some kind of David and Goliath tale, in which the courageous Barry repels the advances of the big, bad Liverpool, in return for the minnow that is Manchester City. The exact opposite is in fact true. The former Villa captain was lured by prophesised and untold riches, by the new Chelsea in town.
We all know what type of player that this kind of club attracts: your Ashely Cole-type, that's what.
You have such a negative attitude to his every word and action,
Twisting the meaning of what he says so much.
Why is this?
Are you a closet Man.U supporter?
Is it the band wagon syndrome?
Is it jingoism?
Or is it that you are victim of the British Journalists' disease,
And believe that negative news creates discussion and so sells the bosses paper?