Racing: Racing world remains divided over betting exchange revolution

In a week in which racing has been shaken by Kieren Fallon's failure at Lingfield, Sean Fox's fall at Fontwell and Alan Berry's lame filly at Carlisle, laying the blame for all the sport's ills with the betting exchanges has been the most consistent chorus.

In a week in which racing has been shaken by Kieren Fallon's failure at Lingfield, Sean Fox's fall at Fontwell and Alan Berry's lame filly at Carlisle, laying the blame for all the sport's ills with the betting exchanges has been the most consistent chorus.

The business of exchange betting is the unwanted new arrival in a business realm which has existed quite comfortably for 40 years or so. We should perhaps not be surprised at the reception it has been given in some quarters. "They've taken our money," squeal some traditional bookmakers as they complain that the exchanges enjoy favourable taxation terms.

Exchanges, or person-to-person internet betting, allows punters to bet with one another: to wager on a horse to win, or to lose. It is the latter which has come into focus in recent days. There were exchange patterns which suggested that Fallon and Ballinger Ridge would be beaten at Lingfield last week, when the champion jockey dropped his hands. Fallon has been banned and a further investigation is under way.

This overlapped with the Lancashire-based trainer Berry being charged with a serious offence over the defeat of one of his horses last year after it, too, drifted badly on the betting exchanges. Were they evidence that those in the know can take straight punters straight to the cleaners?

The betting exchange is a relatively new phenomenon. The main players are Betdaq, Sporting Options and Betfair, with the last named the most significant outlet. Betfair was founded in June 2000 with £1m of private money, and gradually eased itself to a turnover of £30,000 a week. By April of the following year that figure was up to £1m. Today, Betfair matches bets between punters and layers in excess of £50m a week.

It is a business miracle, built on the choice and generous prices it provides for punters. The question now is whether it means there is a far bigger price to pay: are the exchanges helping to facilitate wrongdoing in racing?

Greg Nichols, the chief executive of the British Horseracing Board, certainly believes so. "Recent events have drawn further attention to the new and very real threat to racing's integrity posed by betting exchanges, which leave the sport more vulnerable than ever before to malpractice," he said yesterday. "Exchanges have opened the door for unlicensed, anonymous individuals, in Britain or anywhere in the world, to profit directly from a horse losing.

"After a straightforward registration process, people can make money from horses not winning. The result is increasing reports of irregular betting patterns relating to losing horses. These are having a damaging impact on racing's reputation.

"Recreational layers on a betting exchange should be distinguished from non-recreational layers by the size and/or frequency of their laying over a specified period, whereby non-recreational layers would be deemed to be in the business of betting and would require a licence, awarded on the basis of a 'fit and proper' test."

The exchanges say they have done all they can. Last June, Betfair and Sporting Options agreed to a "Memorandum of Understanding" with the Jockey Club, which means that, for the first time, punters' records will become available. It is a racing version of the overturning of the Hippocratic oath.

"We can name names. We can put the faces to the bets," Tony Calvin, the Betfair spokesman, said yesterday. "We have a sophisticated audit trail, by which we can build up a betting pattern to the nth degree and pass on the results. Then it's up to the relevant sport's governing body to regulate their own sport."

This arrangement is less well appreciated by rival bookmakers. "The Memorandum is all well and good. You can trace who has profited, but unless you can confirm a relationship between that person and a jockey or trainer you have absolutely no proof," Simon Clare, the Coral spokesman, said yesterday. "This bloke could be sitting in Hong Kong, Kazakhstan or the Virgin Islands. How does the Jockey Club police the sport in those circumstances? It would have to have twice the resources of Interpol. They are going to find it extremely hard to catch anyone even vaguely organised.

"Betfair don't actually have a duty of care. The people who are defrauded on Betfair are the other customers. It doesn't cost Betfair themselves a penny. In the old days, if a coup was landed or something dodgy happened it was the bookmakers - the big, bad bully - who got the beating.

"Dodgy things happening in racing are not new, but if you asked any punter in a betting shop about the number of suspicious or strange cases over the last year I'm sure they would tell you it's more frequent: weird performances from favourites and horses drifting badly before they lose.

"The simple fact that anyone can now profit considerably from a horse losing threatens the integrity of the sport. That threat has grown with the exchanges. They are providing the quick and easy platform for the cheats. If they didn't exist British horseracing would be in a far safer state than it is today."

Rob Hartnett, the Betdaq managing director, questioned the cause and effect element of the racing trauma of the last few days. "The exchanges are being tarred as being in some way responsible for these events, but I would make the argument that we [exchanges] are doing more than anybody else to try and bring these things to light and out in the open," he said.

"We are straight on to the Jockey Club if we think there is anything suspicious about the running of a horse and we will work with the Jockey Club to make sure those patterns are either ruled in or out as part of any investigation.

"If only from a commercial point of view, it is vitally important for an exchange that people who are out there and putting the bets on have confidence in the sport.

"In the long term, this will all be for the good of the sport and I am confident when we look back in history, we will see these episodes as significant."

To one punting man in the street, albeit a rather serious one, it is not the exchanges per se which are to blame, rather some of the people which use them. "It's the purest form of betting that's ever been invented. You could not get a simpler system: one person wanting to lay a horse and one person wanting to back it. It's absolutely perfect and cannot be improved upon in any way," Dave Nevison, the notable professional punter, said yesterday. "The betting exchange is nothing other than the conduit. It's just that some people use it in a scurrilous way. But that has gone on for time immemorial. There have always been ways of profiting if you were in the know in advance.

"To say the exchanges are detrimental to racing is like saying motorbikes are necessarily dangerous to your health, that people should not have fast cars because they might get killed driving them."

Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
Latest in Sport
Sport
Caption competition
Caption competition
Latest stories from i100
Daily Quiz
SPONSORED FEATURES
Independent Dating
and  

By clicking 'Search' you
are agreeing to our
Terms of Use.

Career Services
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

SThree: Trainee Recruitment Consultant

£20000 - £40000 per annum + competitive: SThree: Exciting career prospect for ...

Recruitment Genius: Account Manager / Media Sales - OTE up to £30,000

£20000 - £30000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This award-winning company, whi...

Recruitment Genius: Senior Software Developer

£40000 - £50000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is a unique & exciting opp...

Recruitment Genius: UX Consultant

£35000 - £45000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: You will be working with a 8 st...

Day In a Page

A groundbreaking study of 'Britain's Atlantis' long buried at the bottom of the North Sea could revolutionise how we see our prehistoric past

Britain's Atlantis

Scientific study beneath North Sea could revolutionise how we see the past
The Queen has 'done and said nothing that anybody will remember,' says Starkey

The Queen has 'done and said nothing that anybody will remember'

David Starkey's assessment
Oliver Sacks said his life has been 'an enormous privilege and adventure'

'An enormous privilege and adventure'

Oliver Sacks writing about his life
'Gibraltar is British, and it is going to stay British forever'

'Gibraltar is British, and it is going to stay British forever'

The Rock's Chief Minister hits back at Spanish government's 'lies'
Britain is still addicted to 'dirty coal'

Britain still addicted to 'dirty' coal

Biggest energy suppliers are more dependent on fossil fuel than a decade ago
Orthorexia nervosa: How becoming obsessed with healthy eating can lead to malnutrition

Orthorexia nervosa

How becoming obsessed with healthy eating can lead to malnutrition
Lady Chatterley is not obscene, says TV director

Lady Chatterley’s Lover

Director Jed Mercurio on why DH Lawrence's novel 'is not an obscene story'
Farmers in tropical forests are training ants to kill off bigger pests

Set a pest to catch a pest

Farmers in tropical forests are training ants to kill off bigger pests
Mexico: A culture that celebrates darkness as an essential part of life

The dark side of Mexico

A culture that celebrates darkness as an essential part of life
Being sexually assaulted was not your fault, Chrissie Hynde. Don't tell other victims it was theirs

Being sexually assaulted was not your fault, Chrissie Hynde

Please don't tell other victims it was theirs
A nap a day could save your life - and here's why

A nap a day could save your life

A midday nap is 'associated with reduced blood pressure'
If men are so obsessed by sex, why do they clam up when confronted with the grisly realities?

If men are so obsessed by sex...

...why do they clam up when confronted with the grisly realities?
The comedy titans of Avalon on their attempt to save BBC3

Jon Thoday and Richard Allen-Turner

The comedy titans of Avalon on their attempt to save BBC3
The bathing machine is back... but with a difference

Rolling in the deep

The bathing machine is back but with a difference
Part-privatised tests, new age limits, driverless cars: Tories plot motoring revolution

Conservatives plot a motoring revolution

Draft report reveals biggest reform to regulations since driving test introduced in 1935