James Lawton: Institutional deceit can destroy game
There always had to be the fear that English rugby would make a poor job of handling the arrival of the professional game. All the years of denial that it was reasonable for an outstanding sportsman of modest means to put himself up for hire brought an inevitable backlash – and a frenzy to grab some of the new action.
But then who could have imagined that they could have made quite such a mess of it?
Well, we know now. Bloodgate has luridly filled in all of the grey areas. That and the descent into such barbarity and cynicism that the coach of the reigning world champions South Africa can escape unscathed from his claims of eye-gouging, which is to say threatening the eyesight of an opponent is part of a man's game.
But then for the extent of the moral crisis for the time being we need to go no further than the shame of Harlequins and the inescapable conclusion that Bloodgate, which is horrendous enough in itself, is only part of a much wider culture of institutionalised deceit. One thing it tells us with depressing predictability is that there is no honour among the new breed of cheats, the most representative of whom is now surely the Harlequins wing Tom Williams. For singing like the proverbial canary to this week's investigation into Bloodgate he has managed to reduce his ban from a year to a mere four months. This we are told will limit the damage to his career – as if there is any limit to the questions he has drawn against himself in an episode which, crowned by his self-satisfied wink, makes a parody of sport.
No doubt his success in mitigation, such as it is, will be seen as some kind of triumph by the players association, whose chief Damien Hopley, declared that the original sentence was "disproportionate".
Disproportionate to what? It says a lot about the moral vacuum in which a once proud game now operates that its nearest point of reference was the eight-week ban handed to the South African flanker Schalk Burger for eye-gouging.
Fake blood. Eye-gouging. Systematic cheating. Which right-minded parents would want their son to get within a mile of such a sport in its current form and with it's utterly dysfunctional moral compass?
Certainly there can be no tears for the victims of Williams' decision to come, for want of a better term, clean. The admission of Harlequins' director of rugby and the former icon of the England team, Dean Richards that apart from Bloodgate he was involved in four other attempts to cover up cheating episodes is a withering blow to the image of the game.
It rips down so many of the old certainties enjoyed by the faithful at Twickenham.
Harlequins after all are not some bunch of brash new boys scenting profit on the rugby block. They are supposed to be at the heart of English rugby tradition. Right now you can only say, some heart, some tradition.
Three weeks ago we were asked to celebrate the success of the England campaign to land the 2015 World Cup. We were told, by the fine former England centre Will Greenwood, that it was a wonderful chance to advance the values of the world game.
But what values? What is rugby, especially English rugby at this point, to say about those values? Only, that for the present they do not exist. They have been swept aside in a grotesque attempt to gain an edge, any kind of edge by any kind of means. The rest has been a series of lies.
England's World Cup is six years away. It will take all of that to cleanse the game. It is not something that can be done piecemeal. The requirement is an extremely powerful hose.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
Whatever his personal reasons, Lawton can't be allowed to get away with trying to smear the whole of a fine sport using the actions of a very few professionals in the game.
To characterise rugby as being a game without values, without honour, and to demand sanctimoniously "what right-minded parents would take their son within a mile of such a sport?" is wilfully to deny the realities of grassroots rugby - the hundreds of amateur and semi-professional clubs that make up the overwhelming majority of what is and has always been overwhelmingly a sport for players, whose spectators are almost all ex-players.
Grassroots rugby is what it has always been - a sport where honesty rules. There is no room for the boastful, the show pony, the back-stabber in a confrontational sport where no-one can hide behind attitudes, where cowardice, laziness and selfishness are clear for all to see, and where players need to put their bodies on the line in support of one another. Or rather, there IS room for such bullsh*tters because rugby is largely open-armed and inclusive, but they are seen for what they are, and tend to have the p** taken out of them.
Right from the start at minis level, rugby players are coached to be honest with themselves and their colleagues, to be modest in victory and brave in defeat. And unlike many high-profile team sports, the duffers aren't left mouldering on the sidelines, they are seen as part of the team - just as the talented are not treated as superstars. Referees are not sworn at, touchline supporters of younger teams aren't allowed to scream abuse or encourage violence. In short, young rugby players are coached to be self-disciplined, self-reliant, and good team players too.
Maybe Lawton and his ilke should for once drag themselves away from the free booze and glad-hands of their high-flying lifestyle, and slum it at any one of the country's non-professional rugby clubs. Despite his obvious dislike of the game he'd be made welcome and treated with respect (though his blow-hard windbaggery might attract some comment), and it would be valuable reality check.
We'd certainly make him welcome at Hastings & Bexhill in sunny Sussex - buy him a beer and explain the sport to him - because like most decent rugby clubs we're getting p**d off with this wholesale misrepresentation of our sport.
RussC
I have no doubt there are many perfectly reasonable people playing rugby, both at grass-roots level and among the professionals, but RussC, your piece is as floweringly romantic as Mr Lawton's is unreasonably condemning.
All rugby fans are sickened and dismayed by recent events - but football fans and journalists would be wise to refrain from throwing stones, given the nature of the glass house in which they dwell.
SW, Boston, MA
Eye-gouging is treated specially because blindness is unthinkable. Although in fact, given that we are told gouging is endemic, especially in France, and given that I have never heard of a permanent injury resulting, maybe this is an over-reaction?
As for yanking of testicles and whatnot... well, wear a box and rely on the ref to see it and send them off. It's not going to kill you. It's just not a big deal. I'm about to put my shoulder into your ribs at a flat out run. Neither of us will be thinking about our goolies, and whether or not they have been yanked is not going to affect the outcome of the explosive contest that is about to ensue.
Whilst you might indeed have seen drunk rugby players and fans - have you seen any who start riots in city centres as a matter of course? Or have to be segregated in stadiums, or force the police to deploy hundreds and hundreds of their officers to keep opposing fans apart?
Like most involved in the sport they are hypocrites, they wring their hands when perfidious foreigners dive but justify it when it's their own players.
Football is rotten to its core and the recent spate of hacks launching attacks on rugby is just another example of that.
Rugby has many decent values still at its core - but clearly professionalism has eroded a few - but the simple fact is the game has a basic physical honesty that Football lost 40yrs and it's much the better for it. The fact that opposing fans can sit with each other and have a pint during the match with feeling some horrible compulsion to stab each other is something wendyball could only ever dream of.
I doubt you would find any football correspondent in this newspaper roundly praising anyone who dived or cheated, and I can't recall reading anything like that for the few years I've followed these pages. I await to be enlightened otherwise.
As for the fans, I can't disagree; the behaviour of certain hooligans still pervades football - although I would suggest that this has improved substantially over the last 20 years. There is an issue of popularity at stake here too. I'm sure if rugby became as popular as football is in this country, I dare say we would see the same kind of disgusting behaviour. Lest us not forget that there are millions of people who follow football without the slightest urge to stab anyone, even if they happen to follow a different team.