Rugby Union

Rain (AM and PM) 6° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

McGeechan's Lion-sized headache

The coach for this summer’s tour to South Africa has difficult decisions to make in key areas

By Chris Hewett

<b> 15 LEE BYRNE (Wales)</b><br/>  Delon Armitage is closing in, but his all-round game remains the best in town.

GETTY IMAGES

15 LEE BYRNE (Wales)
Delon Armitage is closing in, but his all-round game remains the best in town.

It used to be so simple. When a team won a Grand Slam in Lions year, as Wales did before the trips to New Zealand in 1950 and 1971, the Test side reflected with considerable accuracy the balance of power among the home unions. Then England started confusing everything. Precious few members of Bill Beaumont's clean-sweepers featured in the series against South Africa in 1980, although Beaumont himself was captain, and when Sir Clive Woodward, a red-rose patriot beside whom John Bull reeks of treachery, led an embarrassingly overstaffed squad to All Black country in 2005, his marginalisation of the Welshmen who had gone through the Six Nations card a few weeks previously caused a furore in Newport and all points west.

Not even Woodward would ignore Brian O'Driscoll and Paul O'Connell ahead of the forthcoming arm- wrestle with the Springboks, so we can be absolutely certain that Ian McGeechan, a coach with a long track record of telling the wood from the trees, will select the two outstanding Irish players of their generation, thereby rewarding them for their Grand Slam heroics over the last couple of months. In truth, Ireland could have lost all five matches and still seen their two green-shirted titans board the plane. Some players are so good, they pick themselves irrespective of results.

But what of the rest? What of Rob Kearney and Luke Fitzgerald, Ronan O'Gara and Gordon D'Arcy, Jerry Flannery and Stephen Ferris? Things have become rather complicated here, not least because England – yes, them again – muddied the waters by playing unusually well for unusually long periods against France and Scotland. Who at the start of the season saw Delon Armitage in a Lions jersey? Those saying they did are lying through their teeth. The same goes for Riki Flutey, Toby Flood, Lee Mears and Tom Croft.

Had McGeechan opted to retrace Woodward's steps and select enough players to fill Thunderbird II, the choice would be relatively easy. But he hasn't, so it isn't. The most experienced coach in Lions history – not to mention the most successful, with two series victories and a near miss behind him – says he will pick 35 or 36 players, rather than 350, and as a result, some big names will be sweating on the announcement when it is made towards the end of next month. Steve Borthwick, the England captain, might miss out, just as his predecessor Phil de Glanville was overlooked (by McGeechan, note) a little over a decade ago, while Ryan Jones, the captain of Wales, is in a loose-forward dogfight with people performing just a little better than he is.

At least Jones has some high-profile games ahead of him in which to reinforce his case: this week's EDF Cup semi-final against Gloucester, followed by Ospreys' eagerly awaited Heineken Cup semi-final in Munster. Borthwick does not have this luxury, given that Saracens, free-falling their way towards a South African ground zero, have become an irrelevance since he last turned out for them. Most of the Scottish candidates (and there aren't many of them) are also prey to the "out of sight, out of mind" syndrome. At least Euan Murray, the tight-head prop, plays his rugby at Northampton.

McGeechan will cast a keen eye over the seven major cup ties scheduled to be played before the witching hour of final selection in the hope that they generate some light as well as heat, for the Six Nations was not of enormous help to him. A team of the tournament would feature plenty of Lions contenders: only the brilliant new French wing Maxime Medard and his countryman Thierry Dusautoir – plus, inevitably, the Italian No 8 Sergio Parisse, who has a legitimate claim to being the best player in the world – could expect to find places in a British Isles-dominated side. However, some of the coach's odds-on favourites before Christmas have weakened since.

Take Shane Williams, for instance. Less than a year ago, he was running rings round a Springbok wing as potent as Bryan Habana and cementing himself in the minds of the judges as the International Rugby Board's player of 2008, yet in the tight Six Nations games of recent weeks he has been much less effective. He is, of course, every inch a Lion, but as the Irish half-backs reminded us at the Millennium Stadium, those inches are in very short supply. Is McGeechan prepared to gamble that the South Africans will not pepper the diminutive Welshman with high balls, or will he pick a bigger man – Kearney, let's say – on the basis that defence wins matches.

And then there is the question of dear old Gavin Henson, the celebrity centre with a disciplinary record almost as unfortunate as his body language. During last Saturday's magnificent Six Nations finale in Cardiff, Henson wowed the crowd with some lovely touches while giving the impression that he couldn't have cared less whether he was there or not. He then proceeded to bad-mouth his team in public, for the second international match running. Is he worth the fuss and bother? Probably. Will he get through an entire seven-week tour without saying the wrong thing in the wrong place at the wrong time? Probably not.

There again, Warren Gatland has not been setting the best of examples just lately – and he will be one of the Lions' senior strategists. The Wales coach said things about Ireland, with whom he once worked, that immediately returned to bite him on his front-row forward's backside, so it will be interesting to see if he leaves the mind games to someone else on arrival in South Africa. At least his team stretched the Irish to snapping point at the weekend, thereby underling the fact that although they finished fourth in the Six Nations table, they were very definitely the second best team in the competition.

Not that this was nearly enough to meet public expectation. Only Ireland managed that. England, who have not won a title since 2003 and gave no indication that things were about to change, finished in credit on the results sheet, just as they did in 2008. The difference? Martin Johnson will not be ritually slaughtered – just try it – for finishing runner-up, as Brian Ashton was for doing precisely the same this time last year. That's the Rugby Football Union for you.

For all that, Brian Smith, a self-proclaimed Ashton disciple, is beginning to summon some green shoots of recovery on the attacking front. His faith in Flutey, a wholly positive influence in midfield in recent matches, has been seen to be justified, as has his enthusiastic support of Armitage at full-back. It may also be that he has found himself a genuinely creative spirit at outside-half in Flood, whose distribution in the Calcutta Cup match was a joy to behold.

All England need now is for Jonny Wilkinson to get fit and Danny Cipriani to get his act together. That will really confuse things. In rugby, having too many options is every bit as troublesome as having too few. Ask McGeechan, the man with the Lion-sized headache.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

get over brian ashton
[info]fatgav wrote:
Tuesday, 24 March 2009 at 08:10 am (UTC)
when i should be posting about the team selection, you have to have a pop re Ashton again. Are you related?

forget finishing second, we all know this year and that year was not a reflection of what we want to see from England. Ashton never got his team behind him (Wales 2nd half at Twickenham was the only time I have ever turned a tv off whilst England are playing, oh wait the other time was the 36-0 drubbing by SA in the opening of the 07 RWC).

pls stop bringing it up your otherwise excellent reporting is adversely affected

Gav
Your selection was almost credible ....
[info]lardinio wrote:
Tuesday, 24 March 2009 at 08:12 am (UTC)
.... until you added Borthwick!
Sensible analysis at last
[info]tonytaff wrote:
Tuesday, 24 March 2009 at 10:25 am (UTC)
Can you give Peter Bilge some lessons?
lions tour party
[info]tonto59 wrote:
Tuesday, 24 March 2009 at 10:31 am (UTC)
Why is it that Welsh rugby journalists, even those of distinction pick the lions side based on who is the best Welshman in that position?. Journalists from, ireland, England and scotland seem to argue each individuals case on merit....Is it chip on the shoulder factor?
a couple of thoughts
[info]pmagnier wrote:
Tuesday, 24 March 2009 at 12:20 pm (UTC)
Stephen Ferris is your only serious ommission: I simply can't think of a better no 6 in the champs, except maybe Dausatoir. Also, not so sure about that many Welsh forwards since they have shown some serious deficiencies there in a couple of matches.
Standout for the Lions?
[info]stormy39 wrote:
Tuesday, 24 March 2009 at 04:36 pm (UTC)
15 Byrne - yes
14 Bowe - yes
13 O'Driscoll - yes and captain
12 Henson - Agreed - rare talent
11 Williams??? Will Geech allow him to fail? Wouldn't he be more effective as a impact sub when there are bruised legs and tired heads? Would the Lions not benefit from a player like Monye or Tom Evans? Bigger, faster and stronger? Or even the much tipped Rory Lamont until he suffered injury. In my view if any player can even draw a few bits of praise from outside of the scottish press they must be doing something a little special?
10 Jones??? O'Gara??? Surely the Lions want to take the game to the Boks? You don't start players like this if you do. Jones could survive but has not got enough of an attacking edge to start. Flood - he may be young but if he has Lions players all around him there should be no problem with a little inexperience. He must have 30 odd caps now anyhow? Wilkonson looms large as well - if fit he will go.
9 Ellis - no not a chance of starting - outside bet to go. Granted he is a good young abbrasive edgy player - but his reputation for being a little to edgy will work against him. If Jones starts at 10 and because of the huge Welsh coaching element of the Lions Mike Phillips will start. He shouldn't but he may due to who is around him (Martyn Williams and possibly Ryan Jones and Andy Powell - Stephen Jones and Henson plus Byrne and Jenkins and maybe Rees). Mike Blair is the outstanding scrumhalf in Britain followed by Cusiter (good that hes returning to the magners league). If Blair can perform so well and be recognised internationally as a top player behind a scottish pack and with to be honest well below par halfback partners then he will surely start? (Blair, Phillips and Cusiter - already a Lion - to go).
1 Gethin Jenkins - dead cert
2 Lee Mears - good call - i ve always thought he was a good player but come round to him more recently. Flannery will go - but i have massice doubts over his calibre. Mears may pip Ross Ford to start due to experience but not if Euan Murray and Mike Blair start? Close will depend on other decisions. Scrums will be the major setpiece of the tests not lineouts. Neither side will want to kick the ball to the oppositions backs in space and seeing it is the best second rowers in britain i can't see the Boks trying to attack the lineout? The breakdown and the scrum are the key zones. Strenght and size may therefore be crucial? Ford over Mears?
3 Euan Murray - destoryed the "Beast" at Murrayfield - the Boks already fear him - "The Beast is dead; Long live Murray!"
4 Alun Wyn Jones - nearly dead cert but depends on back row lineout options and tackle maker, ball winners etc. An abrasive player like Nathan Hines will go ahead of the petulant O'Gallaghan and simple resistable Borthwick?
5 O'Connell - enough said
6 Croft? - no not a chance - Martyn Williams - surely has that wrapped up. Played superbly in the autumn against the Boks. Either him or Ryan Jones - shouldn't be though - he will go. Haskell is a great player? When is Tom Rees fit - he is superb. Strokosch maybe even Jason White are ahead of Croft.
7 Wallace - easy peasy
8 Hard very hard. Heaslip - yeah great he preformed reasonably well. Parisse - rinsed him. Worsley - to be honest outclassed him. Andy Powell - better player - just got attacked over one major blunder. Worsley or Powell to start.
Re: Standout for the Lions?
[info]archfarchnad wrote:
Wednesday, 25 March 2009 at 09:36 am (UTC)
stormy39, do you actually follow rugby? Your insight into the game is about as good as your spelling, punctuation and grammar.
Leave out Jones and O'Gara because they can't take the game to anyone (are you serious?), instead take Flood... because his inexperience (you said it) won't matter as he'll have real Lions around him!!! Oh, great logic that! Maybe I should go on that basis.
Before you come back with any retort, let me just make my closing point: you picked Martyn Williams (the best openside in Europe, maybe the world) as a CERTAINTY at... blindside flanker.
I rest my case.
Re: Standout for the Lions?
[info]stormy39 wrote:
Wednesday, 25 March 2009 at 04:03 pm (UTC)
Flip man! You do twist meaning and words don't you.
Williams at 6 because Wallace at 7? Seems pretty simple to me?! Wallace outclassed Williams in the 6 nations so he gets the 7 shirt - he's faster as well. It makes no difference having Williams or Wallace at 6 or 7 as long as they both start. The breakdown will be more than vital so to have both of them battling there is crucial to slow the Boks' ball down and secure Lions platforms off which to raid. The only hitch would be lineout positioning but i d prefer Wallace at the back as he could use his speed to collect and run long throws as well as quickly pressurising the scrum half, fly half etc.
Now if you "follow" rugby (ridiculous terminology you have to have played or be playing it to really understand whats going on - "following" is secondary to that.) you should know that O'Gara litterally broke down during a Lions game once. He was visibly shaking, crying and completely footloose. O'Gara will not start - i never said he will not go. Jones - a warhorse - gifted player but one who does not have that attacking flair that is needed to unlock defences either around the breakdown or through the line. Admittedly over the last three or so seasons i have been happily surprised by his relatively infrequent dashes but they seem to appear against lesser sides only - he'll get destroyed trying to do that against the Boks. He will go though! Jones and O'Gara are very conservative northern hemispere flyhalfs - good with the boot, solid enough in defence, with good hands and ability to swing it wide.
Now Flood - approaching 24 - has been mentored by Wilkonson throughout his entire fledgling career. He has already played in a World Cup semi and final. I don't believe Jones or O'Gara have had this opportunity? Quote you "instead take Flood... because his inexperience (you said it) won't matter as he'll have real Lions around him!!! Oh, great logic that! Maybe I should go on that basis." Firstly i never "said it" - i "said" - "Flood - he may be young but if he has Lions players all around him there should be no problem with a little inexperience." Secondly - "Lions players". Thirdly - "there should be no problem with a little inexperience" - "a LITTLE inxperience" - he is experienced enough. He has played against every major international side atleast once if not twice and as i said performed at a decent level in the World Cup semi and final.

You just wait and see boyo - Williams and Wallace to start. Williams has played for Wales at 6 7 and 8 and seeing he is "the best opensider in Europe" at 35 years of age he can slide effortlessly into any back row position. O'Gara and S.Jones will go but so will Flood and i back him to start. We saw the weakness of O'Gara in this tournament against england where he had a shocker - the other irish players carried him through - against England - at home - laughable. He was dodgy in moments against Scotland. Two terrifying teams. The Boks will run all over him if given the chance. Flood - younger, fitter, better in defence and attack will be supported by the other Lions around him - if needs be. The fact that he has played centre as well is very beneficial as his experience there enhances his knowledge and boost his potential as a superb flyhalf. Carter, Wilko etc the best flyhalfs around nearly always have top level experience at centre. S.Jones - nope. O'Gara - nope.

Your case - Mr I Follow Rugby With Logic - er ha ahh ahh - can Rest In Peace. Six foot under; dead and buried.
Ball carrier
[info]ilkalottie wrote:
Wednesday, 25 March 2009 at 04:02 pm (UTC)
Surely it has to be Fred Goodwin.
Just tell him that the South Africans want their ball back.
Re: Ball carrier
[info]stormy39 wrote:
Wednesday, 25 March 2009 at 04:09 pm (UTC)
As in Fred Goodwin - "the shredder" Goodwin?

Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today