Backlog hits Navratilova title hopes
Saturday 03 July 2004
Supertramp's hit single "It's Raining Again" could easily be the anthem of Wimbledon 2004, and all the rain breaks have brought back the reality of three matches in a day for the 47-year-old Martina Navratilova.
With intermittent showers wreaking havoc with yesterday's schedule at the All England Club, Navratilova faced the prospect of two mixed doubles matches and a women's doubles in the space of a few hours in her quest for a record 21st - or even 22nd - Wimbledon title. She shares the record of 20 titles with her former mentor, Billie Jean King.
The congestion has been exacerbated by the failure of Navratilova and her mixed doubles partner, Leander Paes, to convert two match points in an enthralling third-round match on Thursday night. Taking to Court 13 at just gone six o'clock against the Zimbabwe brother-and-sister pairing of Cara and Wayne Black, play was finally called to a halt at 9.10pm with the final set level at 10-10.
Navratilova and Paes, the defending champions, had two match points on the Wayne Black serve at 4-5, one of them a long and dramatic rally ending with Navratilova hitting a volley just wide. They also had a blazing row with the umpire Jeremy Shales in the next game after he refused to accept a line judge's wish to correct his call.
But Navratilova's biggest fury will be reserved for the lack of a conclusion to the match, which could hamper her chances of a record-breaking title in her final Wimbledon - she insists this is her last time, though we have heard that before.
Because of a convention which says players coming off court late at night should not normally be asked to complete an unfinished match at the start of the following day's play, yesterday's programme had her women's doubles semi-final as second on Court One. She and Lisa Raymond, the No 3 seeds, were due to face the fifth-seeded Liezel Huber and Ai Sugiyama. Navratilova was then due back on Court No 13 for the conclusion of her mixed doubles match, and if she and Paes won that, they were scheduled to face Rainer Schüttler and Barbara Schett in the quarter-finals.
Though Navratilova is the star attraction in the women's doubles, the top-seeded pair of Virginia Ruano Pascual and Paola Suarez are looking to make their own piece of history. They hold the US, Australian and French Open titles, and if they add this year's Wimbledon title, they will become the first pair to hold all four majors since Navratilova and Pam Shriver won their third pure Grand Slam in 1987. Ruano Pascual and Suarez were due to play their semi-final against Cara Black and Rennae Stubbs yesterday after the first of the two men's semi-finals between Mark Knowles and Daniel Nestor, and Julian Knowle and Nenad Zimonjic. The winner will play either Jonas Björkman and Todd Woodbridge, or an all-Australian pairing, Wayne Arthurs and Paul Hanley.
What time is the 2015 WWE Royal Rumble on? TV details and full card
Sam Burgess: Bath and England's next big thing
Australian Open 2015: Andy Murray gets his revenge over Grigor Dimitrov to face home favourite Nick Kyrgios
Brighton 2 Arsenal 3 player ratings: Did Tomas Rosicky's performance and goal make him man of the match at Amex Stadium?
Liverpool transfer news and rumours: Glen Johnson to stay; Fabian Delph move goes up in flames; Marc-Andre Ter Stegen for loan deal
- 1 Benedict Cumberbatch says Hollywood is better for black British actors
- 2 Man who held up 'hire me' sign at Waterloo station returns a year later with 'I'm hiring' sign
Nigel Farage: NHS might have to be replaced by private health insurance
'We would evict Queen from Buckingham Palace and allocate her council house,' say Greens
French court convicts three over homophobic tweets, in case hailed as a 'significant victory' by LGBT rights campaigners
George Galloway condemns 'racist, Islamophobic, hypocritical rag' Charlie Hebdo at freedom of speech rally
British Muslim school children suffering a backlash of abuse following Paris attacks
Islamic history is full of free thinkers - but recent attempts to suppress critical thought are verging on the absurd