Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Wimbledon: No love lost as Andy Murray and Tomas Berdych prepare for semi-final

Scot and Czech had very public fall-out during 2015 Australian Open 

Paul Newman
Wimbledon
Thursday 07 July 2016 18:37 BST
Comments
Andy Murray during practice ahead of his semi-final
Andy Murray during practice ahead of his semi-final (Getty)

When Andy Murray meets Tomas Berdych in the semi-finals here on Friday there could be more storylines to follow than in a whole week of EastEnders. Just try these for starters.

Berdych is from the Czech Republic, which is the home country of Murray’s coach, Ivan Lendl. After Lendl’s first spell coaching Murray ended two years ago, Berdych asked the seven-times Grand Slam champion to coach him. Lendl declined, saying he did not want to coach any more. However, when Murray asked Lendl to return to his entourage this summer, he agreed.

Then there is Dani Vallverdu, one of Murray’s best and oldest friends, who was a long-term member of the Scot’s coaching team. They parted company at the end of 2014, when Murray felt his entourage were not all pulling in the same direction. Vallverdu had reportedly been disappointed by the Scot’s failure to consult him before recruiting Amelie Mauresmo as his coach.

Murray celebrates his victory at the end of his epic quarter-final (Getty)

Within weeks Berdych appointed Vallverdu as his coach. Then guess who met in the semi-finals of the next Grand Slam tournament, at last year’s Australian Open? Murray beat Berdych, but only after four emotionally-charged sets.

In the first set in particular Murray kept shouting in the general direction of Berdych’s player box, where Vallverdu was sitting. The Scot also complained to the umpire about something Berdych said as the two men passed at a changeover, though the Czech later insisted that he had only been congratulating himself on winning the first set.

The tensions got to Murray’s camp during the match. His wife, Kim Sears, who was then his fiancée, was caught on camera delivering a foul-mouthed rant in Berdych’s direction. In the subsequent final she wore a tee-shirt bearing the words “Parental Advisory: Explicit Content”.

Murray now describes that time as “a really uncomfortable period”. He explained: “Dani was someone I had known since I was 15. He was one of my best friends and in the press and the build-up to it, stuff was awkward. It adds a lot of tension to the situation. A Grand Slam semi-final is tense enough and when you throw that into the equation, it wasn’t great.

“Obviously I could have handled myself better in the match. Me and Tomas had always got on well for most of the time and the tension spilled over to my team and to my wife. That happens occasionally. I’ve seen it with other players over the years. I spoke to Tomas the day afterwards and apologised. We’ve been great since.”

Did Murray think his wife would be wearing her “Explicit Content” tee-shirt again for Friday’s semi-final? “I hope not,” he said.

Vallverdu, who developed a good relationship with Lendl when working as his assistant, parted company with Berdych two months ago. Was Murray therefore planning to speak to his old friend for some inside information about his semi-final opponent?

“Dani and Ivan speak to each other all the time,” Murray said. “I don’t normally speak to Dani during tournaments unless we actually see each other when we are there. But Dani and Ivan speak all the time and obviously Tomas has spoken to Ivan a bunch when Tomas was trying to get him to work with him.”

Andy Murray fell out with Tomas Berdych last year (Getty)

Had Murray ever asked Lendl why he turned down Berdych? “No I haven’t but I probably will over the next few months,” the Scot said. “I think a number of guys have spoken to Ivan over the last couple of years and he obviously just didn’t fancy it. I don’t know what the reasons are and there’s many things they go into, but Ivan is pretty open-minded. He wouldn’t have gone into it thinking ‘no chance’. He also did a few days’ training with [Grigor] Dimitrov.”

Did Murray have his own view as to why Lendl said yes to coaching him again after turning down the chance to work with Berdych? “Maybe it’s because we know how it went the last time,” he said. “I don’t want to say that it’s less of a risk in a way, but because it went so well last time, now is just the [right] time.

“Ivan watched me a bit over the last few months and saw I was playing better. Physically I was doing well. I was in a tough place when we stopped the last time. Obviously when I came back from my back surgery it was not an easy time, but he clearly thought he could help and my game is going in the right direction. That’s why I think he decided he wanted to do it again.”

Berdych was asked here what he felt about Lendl turning him down but then accepting Murray’s offer. “He basically said that he didn’t have the time and he didn’t want to be involved in tennis. Then he came back to Andy. So that’s how it is. He’s just another opponent for me. I’m just going to try to focus on my next match.”

How about his relationship with Murray in the wake of what had happened in Melbourne? “That’s it,” Berdych said. “That happened. That’s in the past. Otherwise it’s absolutely fine.”

Andy Murray's wife Kim Sears at Wimbledon this week (Getty)

What is also in the past – or so Murray hopes – is Berdych’s hold over the world No 2 on the court. The 30-year-old Czech, who played in his only Grand Slam final when he lost to Rafael Nadal here in 2010, won six of his first 10 meetings with Murray, but has lost their last four encounters.

“When we played at the beginning of our careers he was much stronger physically than me,” Murray said. “Maybe I let him bully me a bit on the court. The last few times I have played him I feel I’m much better against him physically compared with what I was even a few years ago. Since the back surgery I have been playing more offensive tennis with a lot of variety and making it harder for him to play his game.”

Berdych said: “Andy’s been through some changes and different styles when he’s playing. I think at the beginning he was a bit more defensive, just waiting for what the opponent was going to do. It was working pretty well for me. I was able to really dictate the game and play aggressive.

“Now he’s become more aggressive, way more creative on the court. He’s always looking for how to improve, how to be better. I think that’s the difference between him at the beginning of his career and now.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in