A Name loses game, set but not yet match: Buster Mottram, former British tennis star, on the frustrations of being in a loss-making Lloyd's syndicate

Share
Related Topics
I am surprised that the Lloyd's AGM did not break out into a brawl. Only effective stage-management by Lloyd's prevented this - it seems the only thing they can regulate. All the ingredients were there for a bust-up to happen: anger, desperation and, more importantly, the belief held by many Names that we are victims of negligence, possible fraud and a conspiracy by the working Names to rip off the outsiders.

Dispassionate analysis of the facts would appear to bear this out. As a ruined Name myself, my feelings fluctuate daily between worry for the future and the desire for recompense from those who have caused these problems. I have been in flux for a couple of years now; it is like living in a permanent state of bereavement. Almost weekly I receive correspondence about something or other to do with Lloyd's. Most of it is standard information circulars or notification from one of the many action groups I am involved in.

Sometimes I get letters from the Names' agent, threatening dire consequences and legal action if the money is not forthcoming. In the same breath, with the utmost consideration, the agency informs me that there will be nothing to worry about if I come to an accommodation with Lloyd's. How thoughtful of them.

Dealing with all this correspondence is exhausting and time-consuming. I have lost count of the hundreds of letters that I have written to action group secretaries, lawyers, accountants and agents, as well as the thousands (this is no exaggeration) of telephone calls made. And, of course, with every letter that I write, there is the inevitable response that needs filing, cross-referencing and in some cases replying to.

These bureaucratic demands on their own are just about endurable, though they would test the patience of Job. It is the sense of hopelessness and guilt that is so destructive. One mulls over in one's mind the stupidity of ever getting involved with Lloyd's. The sense of demoralisation is compounded by smug comments made by Names not in this plight and others who are not members at all, yet profess to have rejected the opportunity of joining due to their foresight and objection to unlimited liability. Schadenfreude?

These complacent sentiments really get you down. The 'I told you so' syndrome and comments such as 'You were aware of the risk you were running' only make one feel worse, while suggesting that they were either very smart or extremely lucky. I have lost count of the times I have said to people that unlimited liability was explained to me by my agent as theoretical: 'Like a meteor hitting London - an act of God, nothing more serious than that.'

I was introduced to my agent, Kingsley Underwriting Agencies (now renamed Lime Street Underwriting Agencies) by a member of Wimbledon, as many of my tennis compatriots were. In 1983, the man buttonholed me in one of the bathrooms after I played my match at Wimbledon, and proceeded to explain the benefits of membership. Human nature being what it is, with that lure of apparent easy money, one became mesmerised by the Lloyd's myth and sought to know more about it.

He then took me up to Lloyd's to meet Mr Robin Kingsley (another Wimbledon member) and chairman of Kingsley Underwriting Agencies. His agency has now gone into bankruptcy (I believe that this was the only Names' agency to do so). Its affairs are in the hands of receivers, who are scrutinising his conduct and that of his directors.

Only time will tell if the Names are liable under their underwriting agreements to pay the policy holders if negligence is proven. Lloyd's would have you believe that is the case and that the Names are responsible for the residue of the losses beyond the errors and omissions cover. Well, they would say that, wouldn't they? Perhaps, as with the 'pay now, sue later' provisions of the underwriting agreement, the commercial court will overrule Lloyd's in this regard, too. But if the Names directly on these syndicates aren't responsible for the losses, who is?

There have been rumours of a 'market solution' to alleviate the misery of the worst-hit Names, but nothing serious has been put forward. The Lloyd's business plan introduced recently sets out a completely new strategy for the organisation but does not address these problems. Implicit in it is an admission of its failure as a regulator and that it has permitted its Names to be ripped off by 'wide boys' and the negligent. According to the plan: 'Lloyd's current problems are in large measure self-

inflicted - underwriting standards for some syndicates were too low for too long . . . Members have been rightly critical of our performance . . . Market practitioners must not profit at the expense of the society as a whole.'

Ninety-five per cent of the 'catastrophe losses' affecting Lloyd's in 1988 fell on 12 syndicates and, in 1989, 79 per cent fell on 14, according to the Walker Report on Lloyd's organisation. I, unfortunately, am in several of them. Sir Patrick Neill, who investigated the ill-fated Feltrum Syndicates, summed it up in his report in October 1992, when he stated that 'the reinsurance spiral operated in the event of a catastrophe so as to negate the basic principle of insurance, which is a spreading and sharing of risk, and instead focused the losses on to a few.'

Mr Justice Saville, the high court judge in charge of the commercial court, went one step further, questioning whether the spiral was insurance at all. Underwriters, despite being warned as far back as April 1988 about the time-bomb ticking beneath them in the event of a catastrophe, continued to reinsure themselves with one another, creating a massive spiral in the event of a disaster. Will this be judged by the courts to be a violation of agents' fiduciary care under the underwriting agreement to their Names?

Lloyd's do not even claim any defence in this matter; they negated their regulatory role. Remarks made in the Lloyd's business plan and various reports confirm what had been suspected and alleged for a long time, that Lloyd's had failed in its duty of regulation. Yet they do nothing to put right the wrongs of the past. No wonder one resorts to litigation as the only method of breaking this impasse. I understand now what Ian Hay Davison (deputy chairman and chief executive of Lloyd's from 1983 to 1986) means when he stated that he found it wasn't a case of just one rotten apple in a barrel at Lloyd's but that the whole barrel was tainted.

I have learnt that there are many irregularities, a lot of deceit, secrecy and insider dealing in the Lloyd's market. How else can one explain the more favourable position that working Names have enjoyed over the external Names over a 10-year period? I would advise anyone considering joining to think again.

(Photograph omitted)

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Austen Lloyd: Commercial Property Solicitor - Exeter

Excellent Salary: Austen Lloyd: EXETER - A great new opportunity with real pot...

Austen Lloyd: Senior Private Client Solicitor - Exeter

Excellent Salary: Austen Lloyd: EXETER - An outstanding senior opportunity for...

Sauce Recruitment: Retail Planning Manager - Home Entertainment UK

salary equal to £40K pro-rata: Sauce Recruitment: Are you available to start a...

Ashdown Group: Front-End Developer - London - up to £40,000

£35000 - £40000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Creative Front-End Developer - Claph...

Day In a Page

Read Next
 

Errors & Omissions: When is a baroness not a baroness? Titles still cause confusion

Guy Keleny
 

CPAC 2015: What I learnt from the US — and what the US could learn from Ukip

Nigel Farage
HIV pill: Scientists hail discovery of 'game-changer' that cuts the risk of infection among gay men by 86%

Scientists hail daily pill that protects against HIV infection

Breakthrough in battle against global scourge – but will the NHS pay for it?
How we must adjust our lifestyles to nature: Welcome to the 'Anthropocene', the human epoch

Time to play God

Welcome to the 'Anthropocene', the human epoch where we may need to redefine nature itself
MacGyver returns, but with a difference: Handyman hero of classic 1980s TV series to be recast as a woman

MacGyver returns, but with a difference

Handyman hero of classic 1980s TV series to be recast as a woman
Tunnel renaissance: Why cities are hiding roads down in the ground

Tunnel renaissance

Why cities are hiding roads underground
'Backstreet Boys - Show 'Em What You're Made Of': An affectionate look at five middle-aged men

Boys to men

The Backstreet Boys might be middle-aged, married and have dodgy knees, but a heartfelt documentary reveals they’re not going gently into pop’s good night
Crufts 2015: Should foreign dogs be allowed to compete?

Crufts 2015

Should foreign dogs be allowed to compete?
10 best projectors

How to make your home cinema more cinematic: 10 best projectors

Want to recreate the big-screen experience in your sitting room? IndyBest sizes up gadgets to form your film-watching
Manchester City 1 Barcelona 2 player ratings: Luis Suarez? Lionel Messi? Joe Hart? Who was the star man?

Manchester City vs Barcelona player ratings

Luis Suarez? Lionel Messi? Joe Hart? Who was the star man at the Etihad?
Arsenal vs Monaco: Monaco - the making of Gunners' manager Arsene Wenger

Monaco: the making of Wenger

Jack Pitt-Brooke speaks to former players and learns the Frenchman’s man-management has always been one of his best skills
Cricket World Cup 2015: Chris Gayle - the West Indies' enigma lives up to his reputation

Chris Gayle: The West Indies' enigma

Some said the game's eternal rebel was washed up. As ever, he proved he writes the scripts by producing a blistering World Cup innings
In Ukraine a dark world of hybrid warfare and murky loyalties prevails

In Ukraine a dark world of hybrid warfare

This war in the shadows has been going on since the fall of Mr Yanukovych
'Birdman' and 'Bullets Over Broadway': Homage or plagiarism?

Homage or plagiarism?

'Birdman' shares much DNA with Woody Allen's 'Bullets Over Broadway'
Broadchurch ends as damp squib not even David Tennant can revive

A damp squib not even David Tennant can revive

Broadchurch, Series 2 finale, review
A Koi carp breeding pond, wall-mounted iPads and a bathroom with a 'wellness' shower: inside the mansion of Germany's 'Bishop of Bling'

Inside the mansion of Germany's 'Bishop of Bling'

A Koi carp breeding pond, wall-mounted iPads and a bathroom with a 'wellness' shower