But we are good Europeans . . .: David Howell argues that the split over Maastricht can still end in Tory unity

Related Topics
AS THE Maastricht debate has dragged on it has made good copy to suggest that the wounds in the Tory Party run too deep ever to be healed. Now, with an end in sight to the Committee stage of the Maastricht Bill, it is even suggested that the party is heading for an outright split, a repeat of the 1840s split over the Repeal of the Corn Laws - with William Cash presumably in the role of the virulent young Disraeli and John Major as an unyielding Robert Peel.

This is all good historical stuff, but the analogies are quite invalid. The Maastricht differences need do no lasting damage to the party at all because the points at issue are tactical, not strategic.

The Conservative Party is the party of Europe, but it has never been the party of Maastricht. From the very start, in the mid-Eighties, it tried - albeit ineptly - to resist the processes leading up to Maastricht. Then, when the treaty happened none the less, it sought - with a little more success - to insulate the UK from the worst of its effects.

Most of the doubters - barring a few incorrigible Europhobes whom nothing will bring onside - are firmly in line with the bulk of their colleagues. They are also in line with a good and growing part of European opinion. The only real question, which has been obscured by the black-and-

white presentation of the struggle at Westminster, is whether Britain walks off the crumbling Maastricht stage now, or whether we agree to stick with the formalities of the Maastricht process while seeking to reshape Europe on better and more up-to-date lines as soon as the ratification phase is over - assuming that the Danes do not reject it anyway on 18 May.

It is a nice point of diplomatic judgement. My own preference is to stay in there since events are moving in the right direction so fast anyway. But it would be absurd to let a second- order argument of this kind create permanent divisions in Conservative ranks.

Provided the whips take care to avoid encouraging victimisation and parliamentary business managers keep some of their over-zealous henchmen on the leash, there is no reason at all for the affair to do permanent harm.

Generalised pleas for unity will make little impact. By far the best way to make the Government's case, while keeping rancour to a minimum, is to emphasise the alternative directions for Europe which the Government intends to pursue post-Maastricht - and to do so not hesitantly but with confidence and promptitude.

The style is crucial. An apologetic and defensive approach to the new thinking that is so plainly and urgently required, both in relation to the constitution and the overall priorities of the Community,reassures no one. Indeed, it tends to confirm the view of the dedicated anti-

Europeans that Britain is always going to be dancing to other people's tunes in the Community.

We British need a whole change of attitude, and with it a change of language and expression. For four of the five post- war decades we have been conditioned to the sensation of being outvoted and left behind. There have been good reasons and harsh statistics to support this. From this has naturally followed the feeling that others would always be setting the European agenda - as indeed the Germans and French did all the way up to the 1991 Maastricht meeting.

But the Europe of today is a vastly different place from the Europe of 1991, and the reasons for Britain to feel like a nervous junior partner in somebody else's successful show have now evaporated.

This is not to say that now is the time for the British, in their usual maddening way, to shake their heads at these volatile Continentals with their unstable politics, utter a few pious sermons on democracy and turn towards the open sea. We should surely know by now where that kind of cop-out leads.

But with the Germans, who were supposed to be the anchormen of Europe, in their present state of angst, introspection and uncertainty, with France undergoing a political earthquake, with Italy in a political black hole, with the foundations of Belgium shaking, with Spanish disillusion growing and with even applicant states such as Austria running into problems and Sweden drowning in economic woes, this really is the time to see who are Europe's true friends. Certainly, it is high time for positive Europeans, such as the Conservatives must be, to advance their ideas for a stronger, more flexible and more subtly architectured Europe that will be capable of meeting the strains to which it will be increasingly subjected. There are fewer and fewer people left to offend if we speak out (even if some remain very prominent) and many, many friends and allies to be helped, encouraged and given a new sense of European direction. If, following Greater Serbia, the next unfolding horror is Greater Russia, as could easily happen, the need for a new sense of European confidence and direction will be all the greater.

Now is not a moment too soon to begin preparing for a new constitutional settlement in Europe in 1996. We can start to buildfrom here on the foundations - and the rubble - of the Maastricht effort.

To start with, we should draw an editorial pencil through the existing treaties to delete all those patronising phrases about power being graciously delegated and decisions brought closer to the people. Whoever drafted these texts clearly believes that the Community stands at the apex of a hierarchy of power, some of which may, by and by, be generously handed back down to the nation states.

The next treaty must be drafted by those who understand that the issue is about power being devolved to, not from, the Community institutions and that the amount and types of this power are not matters for Community bodies to decide.

The new drafters may or may not want to stick with the word 'subsidiarity', but its meaning must be up-ended. The question must become which issues and powers the member states wish to delegate to the centre, not the other way round, and how those wishes can then be constitutionally entrenched to prevent further unwanted and inefficient centralisation.

These are the concepts and mechanisms which should lie at the heart of Douglas Hurd's 'design for a decentralised Europe'. The task of putting them in place ought to reunite the whole Tory party, except the very few at either extreme of the issue: those who believe Maastricht is perfect and that everything coming from the Elysee or Bonn must be followed, and those who believe that Britain will always be outwitted and should steer clear of the Community altogether.

I believe that most Tories, from the leadership down, reject this unholy alliance, which is rooted in utter defeatism about Britain's ability to change Europe's direction. If they want to stop this defeatist virus spreading and dividing the Conservatives, however, the political leaders will have to seize the intellectual initiative on Europe.

Last time we dithered, sensed that something was wrong with the rush to Maastricht and held back, letting Germany and France make all the running. For the race to 1996 we are in better training and actually have a view of how it should be run. We might even win it. Let us at least start from the view that we can do so.

David Howell is Conservative MP for Guildford and chairman of the House of Commons Select Committee on Foreign Affairs.

(Photograph omitted)

React Now

  • Get to the point
Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Recruitment Genius: SEO Specialist

£21000 - £34000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an opportunity for an e...

Recruitment Genius: In House Counsel - Contracts

Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: This leading supplier of compliance software a...

Recruitment Genius: Associate System Engineer

£24000 - £30000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: The Associate System Engineer r...

Recruitment Genius: Executive Assistant

Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: An Executive Assistant is required to join a l...

Day In a Page

Read Next

Daily catch-up: personality is so much more important than policies

John Rentoul
Zoe Sugg, aka Zoella, with her boyfriend, fellow vlogger Alfie Deyes  

If children are obese then blame food manufacturers, not Zoella

Jane Merrick
General Election 2015: The masterminds behind the scenes

The masterminds behind the election

How do you get your party leader to embrace a message and then stick to it? By employing these people
Machine Gun America: The amusement park where teenagers go to shoot a huge range of automatic weapons

Machine Gun America

The amusement park where teenagers go to shoot a huge range of automatic weapons
The ethics of pet food: Why are we are so selective in how we show animals our love?

The ethics of pet food

Why are we are so selective in how we show animals our love?
How Tansy Davies turned 9/11 into her opera 'Between Worlds'

How a composer turned 9/11 into her opera 'Between Worlds'

Tansy Davies makes her operatic debut with a work about the attack on the Twin Towers. Despite the topic, she says it is a life-affirming piece
11 best bedside tables

11 best bedside tables

It could be the first thing you see in the morning, so make it work for you. We find night stands, tables and cabinets to wake up to
Italy vs England player ratings: Did Andros Townsend's goal see him beat Harry Kane and Wayne Rooney to top marks?

Italy vs England player ratings

Did Townsend's goal see him beat Kane and Rooney to top marks?
Danny Higginbotham: An underdog's tale of making the most of it

An underdog's tale of making the most of it

Danny Higginbotham on being let go by Manchester United, annoying Gordon Strachan, utilising his talents to the full at Stoke and plunging into the world of analysis
Audley Harrison's abusers forget the debt he's due, but Errol Christie will always remember what he owes the police

Steve Bunce: Inside Boxing

Audley Harrison's abusers forget the debt he's due, but Errol Christie will always remember what he owes the police
No postcode? No vote

Floating voters

How living on a houseboat meant I didn't officially 'exist'
Louis Theroux's affable Englishman routine begins to wear thin

By Reason of Insanity

Louis Theroux's affable Englishman routine begins to wear thin
Power dressing is back – but no shoulderpads!

Power dressing is back

But banish all thoughts of Eighties shoulderpads
Spanish stone-age cave paintings 'under threat' after being re-opened to the public

Spanish stone-age cave paintings in Altamira 'under threat'

Caves were re-opened to the public
'I was the bookies’ favourite to be first to leave the Cabinet'

Vince Cable interview

'I was the bookies’ favourite to be first to leave the Cabinet'
Election 2015: How many of the Government's coalition agreement promises have been kept?

Promises, promises

But how many coalition agreement pledges have been kept?
The Gaza fisherman who built his own reef - and was shot dead there by an Israeli gunboat

The death of a Gaza fisherman

He built his own reef, and was fatally shot there by an Israeli gunboat