1. The latest figures from the independent Office for National Statistics suggest no change in the inequality of income after taxes and benefits. The graph above shows the Gini coefficient – the higher the number the more unequal the distribution – from 1977 to 2014.
As you can see, incomes became more unequal in the 1980s, but the trend has been flat since then, with a slight shift towards greater equality recently. These figures support last week’s from the Department of Work and Pensions, which failed to show the expected increase in child poverty, about which I wrote in The Independent on Sunday yesterday.
This is not to say that the level of inequality in Britain today is acceptable, or that 3.7m children living in relative poverty is good. But let the discussion start with the facts rather than the myth.
2. Lawrence Freedman once had an all-purpose article. Expect to see variations of it about the Greek crisis. It begins: “In retrospect it was inevitable... ” And ends: “Things will never be the same again.”
3. Guy Keleny’s Errors & Omissions column on Saturday was good on the difference between convince and persuade, the meaning of to wax lyrical and Sir Brian Leveson’s title.
4. The Top 10 in The New Review, the Independent on Sunday magazine, was a guest list by Simon Thomas of Oxford Dictionaries: Nouns That Are Always Plural. Several more suggestions could have expanded the list:
(Screaming) abdabs. Alms. Athletics. Dregs. Impedimenta. (High) jinks. Linguistics. Mathematics. Mews. Odds. Paraphernalia. Physics. Police. Proceedings. Reparations. Riches. Shambles. Spondulicks.
Thanks to: John Peters, Allan Draycott, Roger White, Adam Huntley, David Crawford, Jonathan Wadman and Ross Allen.
5. Chart of voter flows between 2010 and 2015 elections from Electoral Calculus:
6. And finally, thanks to Moose Allain for this:
“Is it Béyonce or Beyoncé? I can’t quite place her accent.”Reuse content