Dave Lee Travis, Bill Roache – and the law under the spotlight

It is telling that both men referred to there being ‘no winners’ and ‘no victory’



The trial which has ended in Dave Lee Travis’s acquittal on the majority of charges of sexual misconduct that he faced has provided an object lesson in the limits of the judicial system to contend with questions which cover changing moral and social attitudes, as well as solid standards of proof that a court can or should accept. To lose one high-profile “sex-pest” case in a week is unfortunate for the Crown Prosecution Service and the police who amassed the evidence in the expensive and extensive Operation Yewtree, set up in the wake of the revelations of Jimmy Savile’s sex assaults. To lose two, as Coronation Street actor Bill Roache was also is cleared of sex assault charges, looks very problematic.

I would imagine I am not the only person to feel the tug of two very different instincts here. One is to keep on encouraging men and women who have suffered abuse and degradation in the past to speak up.

But that is not the same as offering a legal standard of proof for a conviction after many decades – and the distinction is not just a weaselly one wielded by defence lawyers. For as little as I respect Lee Travis (who has said he liked photographing nude or semi-nude women because he wanted to “utilise their (fantastic) shapes” or Roache, reminiscing about his youthful penchant for “slender, young delicate” women, they have been subject to a trial by public judgement, and they have both been cleared.

The outcome of the court process has hardly provided a satisfactory ending for them or the criminal justice system. It is telling that both men referred to there being “no winners” and “no victory”. Allegations of sexual abuse always stick, which is why the desire to punish as many real offenders as possible must be balanced with a concern for due care over bringing cases to court. When I have this argument about say, rape cases, it is often noisily countered that the conviction rate is low (true) and that many victims fear the reputational damage of coming forward. The unspoken codicil is that if some men are falsely accused, that is a price worth paying.

But we should not be counting justice in a lumpen Soviet tractor-factory way here. It runs against a fundamental principle of justice to target famous names in a mood of overheated retribution for the crimes of a dead (and thus unaccountable) serious offender by widening the net to the point of persecuting others on far scrappier evidence.

You might answer that if many complainants come forward, they cannot be wrong. But a collective slew of accusations, made at a time of vast publicity, years after the alleged offence is to present a real problem for evidence-based justice. Because big institutions – and, frankly, the rest of us – failed in the past to speak out against sleazy, exploitative behaviour, there is now an appetite for the courts to make up for that ethical deficit retrospectively. That is not their job, and it would lead to some very dangerous and random conclusions if it were.

While juries have been guided to take more account of “patterns of behaviour”, in cases such as child and sex abuse, where memories can genuinely fray or be manipulated on either side, it remains vastly important that standards of proof match those we would hope to expect in any criminal case, were we to find ourselves, our father or our partner in the dock.

A desire to right past wrongs, then, should not always lead to the courtroom door. Having in the past ignored or sidelined many women who reported sexual assaults, the police and CPS have, in a fit of moral panic, slithered straight into a position where they appear to take allegations at face value (or more likely, pass the problem over to jurors to take the heat). That is neither competent nor moral. It can’t go on, and the logical result will be time limits on such trials. A small dose of common sense should have led us to this conclusion at the start. The lesson of this mess is regrettably simple: do not rely on panicky public institutions in the middle of a media storm to apply it.

Anne McElvoy is on the staff of ‘The Economist’ and a panellist on Radio 4’s ‘Moral Maze


React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Sauce Recruitment: Retail Planning Manager - Home Entertainment UK

salary equal to £40K pro-rata: Sauce Recruitment: Are you available to start a...

Ashdown Group: Front-End Developer - London - up to £40,000

£35000 - £40000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Creative Front-End Developer - Claph...

Recruitment Genius: Product Quality Assurance Technologist - Hardline & Electric

£18000 - £24000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: The role in this successful eco...

Ashdown Group: QA Tester - London - £30,000

£28000 - £30000 per annum: Ashdown Group: QA Tester - London - £30,000 QA Tes...

Day In a Page

Read Next

CPAC 2015: What I learnt from the US — and what the US could learn from Ukip

Nigel Farage

If I were Prime Minister: I would create a government that actually reflects its people

Kaliya Franklin
HIV pill: Scientists hail discovery of 'game-changer' that cuts the risk of infection among gay men by 86%

Scientists hail daily pill that protects against HIV infection

Breakthrough in battle against global scourge – but will the NHS pay for it?
How we must adjust our lifestyles to nature: Welcome to the 'Anthropocene', the human epoch

Time to play God

Welcome to the 'Anthropocene', the human epoch where we may need to redefine nature itself
MacGyver returns, but with a difference: Handyman hero of classic 1980s TV series to be recast as a woman

MacGyver returns, but with a difference

Handyman hero of classic 1980s TV series to be recast as a woman
Tunnel renaissance: Why cities are hiding roads down in the ground

Tunnel renaissance

Why cities are hiding roads underground
'Backstreet Boys - Show 'Em What You're Made Of': An affectionate look at five middle-aged men

Boys to men

The Backstreet Boys might be middle-aged, married and have dodgy knees, but a heartfelt documentary reveals they’re not going gently into pop’s good night
Crufts 2015: Should foreign dogs be allowed to compete?

Crufts 2015

Should foreign dogs be allowed to compete?
10 best projectors

How to make your home cinema more cinematic: 10 best projectors

Want to recreate the big-screen experience in your sitting room? IndyBest sizes up gadgets to form your film-watching
Manchester City 1 Barcelona 2 player ratings: Luis Suarez? Lionel Messi? Joe Hart? Who was the star man?

Manchester City vs Barcelona player ratings

Luis Suarez? Lionel Messi? Joe Hart? Who was the star man at the Etihad?
Arsenal vs Monaco: Monaco - the making of Gunners' manager Arsene Wenger

Monaco: the making of Wenger

Jack Pitt-Brooke speaks to former players and learns the Frenchman’s man-management has always been one of his best skills
Cricket World Cup 2015: Chris Gayle - the West Indies' enigma lives up to his reputation

Chris Gayle: The West Indies' enigma

Some said the game's eternal rebel was washed up. As ever, he proved he writes the scripts by producing a blistering World Cup innings
In Ukraine a dark world of hybrid warfare and murky loyalties prevails

In Ukraine a dark world of hybrid warfare

This war in the shadows has been going on since the fall of Mr Yanukovych
'Birdman' and 'Bullets Over Broadway': Homage or plagiarism?

Homage or plagiarism?

'Birdman' shares much DNA with Woody Allen's 'Bullets Over Broadway'
Broadchurch ends as damp squib not even David Tennant can revive

A damp squib not even David Tennant can revive

Broadchurch, Series 2 finale, review
A Koi carp breeding pond, wall-mounted iPads and a bathroom with a 'wellness' shower: inside the mansion of Germany's 'Bishop of Bling'

Inside the mansion of Germany's 'Bishop of Bling'

A Koi carp breeding pond, wall-mounted iPads and a bathroom with a 'wellness' shower