- Wednesday 19 June 2013
- My Account
- Logout
- Register
- Login
- News
-
Voices
-
Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Terence Blacker
- Chris Blackhurst
- David Blanchflower
- Archie Bland
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Laura Davis
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Stefano Hatfield
- Philip Hensher
- Ian Herbert
- Howard Jacobson
- Ellen E Jones
- Alice Jones
- Owen Jones
- Simon Kelner
- Dominic Lawson
- Donald Macintyre
- Lisa Markwell
- Comment
- Campaigns
- Debate
- Editorials
- Letters
- IV Drip
- Archive
- Our Voices
- Commentators
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
-
Find by writer
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts & Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Blogs
- Student
- Offers
Tuesday 18 September 2012
Down's Syndrome abortion is a complex discussion, but at least it's being talked about
The Archers ran a poll asking whether characters should abort their disabled baby. Although the decision is far from simple, including the storyline is encouraging.
I have been physically disabled since birth. As a result, I have always believed that every life is equally valuable - or, to put it more specifically, that the life of a disabled person is never any less valuable than the life of a non-disabled person.
Personally, I disagree with abortion as a choice. Women in the West, particularly, have other options open to them if they find themselves unable to raise their biological children. Children can be placed in foster care, or placed up for adoption.
However, abortion on the grounds of disability makes me especially sad. Many would not agree with my views, however. This is a very sensitive issue that has raised strong feelings on both sides for many years.
So when BBC radio drama The Archers recently ran an online poll asking whether characters Mike and Vicky Tucker should abort their baby who would otherwise be born with Down’s Syndrome, many thought the poll was inappropriate. It is easy to see why. The question of abortion, on any grounds, can never have a simple multiple choice answer. For expectant parents, the decision is very rarely, if ever, an easy one to make.
To the BBC’s credit, they quickly expressed regret over the decision to run the poll, admitting that the issue was "too complex and sensitive."
The poll ran on The Archers website in early September, for the usual time of one week. One day after it was published, the BBC posted a response, saying it was sorry that listeners felt so strongly about the vote. It added that polls tend to reflect the storylines that are most talked about in the programme. However, the response also made it clear that the result of the poll would not affect the outcome of the storyline.
Polls, it said, are often about dilemmas facing characters in the programme. It recognised that the Tuckers' decision is more complex than those usually put to polls. However, it adds that "they are still faced with a stark choice one way or the other. So we didn’t think that representing that choice on the poll was trivialising the issue".
A BBC spokesman said they regretted any offence the poll may have caused, adding that the storyline has been well received by listeners and raises a number of important issues about Down’s Syndrome, informed by the advice and expertise of the Down's Syndrome Association.
The Down's Syndrome Association praised The Archers for its handling of the storyline despite the controversy, saying that producers have made sure it is accurate. They encouraged people to keep listening as the story unfolds.
The Archers has now been running for more than 60 years. Over this long period of time, British society has changed in many ways. In fact, perhaps because of its long history, the programme seems more than a little old fashioned to many young adults today. To disabled people, it is an unexpected pleasant surprise that this programme is starting to cover disability issues.
Facts must be faced - abortion is a thought that crosses the minds of many when told their baby may be born disabled. So it is easy to understand why the BBC wants to explore this part of the storyline.
The current Archers website describes the programme as a contemporary drama in a rural setting. Many disabled people would be very pleased to see the Tuckers continuing with the pregnancy, so that The Archers can become a little more contemporary by covering the very important issue of raising a disabled child.
-
Is their marriage our business? No. But Charles Saatchi's row with Nigella Lawson is definitely news
Simon Kelner -
Russell Brand lets loose on MSNBC hosts in promo interview for Messiah Complex tour
-
We never knew Nigella Lawson - and we still don’t
Ellen E Jones -
The Daily Cartoon
-
Should we intervene? Our response to the Charles Saatchi and Nigella Lawson assault is shocking too
Stig Abell
Get your summer started with British Military Fitness
BMF is the UK’s biggest and best loved outdoor fitness classes
How will you make today delicious?
Tell us how you plan to make today delicious and you could win a £50 M&S gift card.
Learn a new language
Add another string to your bow with Rosetta Stone, whether it's Spanish, Italian or Mandarin...
Making reading fun for kids
Nook is donating eReaders to volunteers at high-need schools and participating in exclusive events throughout the campaign.
Introducing the 'Get Reading' campaign
Get the latest on The Evening Standard's campaign to get London's children reading.
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Sarah Ismail
-
So Atos are happy to test disabled people, but not so willing to evacuate them during a fire alarm
-
How can the Atos boss get a bonus of £1million while disabled people suffer?
-
It's a difficult question for any disabled person to answer: would I want to be cured?
-
Iain Duncan Smith's cynical attempt to redefine child poverty will do nothing to reduce it
Related Articles
Get the best in opinion from Independent Voices, straight to your inbox every Thursday lunchtime.
Subscribe
Amol Rajan
A weekly update from the Editor
iJobs General
Ambitous PR Account Manager for Top London Agency!
£30000 - £35000 per annum: May & Stephens Recruitment Group: If you're an ambi...
PR Account Director - Top Healthcare Communications Agency
£43000 - £50000 per annum + £5K Car Allowance + Bens : May & Stephens Recrui...
PR Account Executive & Social Media Guru-Top Tech PR Agency!
£18000 - £22000 per annum + Bens : May & Stephens Recruitment Group: If you're...
Telesales Executive
£16000 - £23000 per annum + OTE £23k - £45k: Connex Education: Connex Educatio...
Day In a Page
First night: The Cripple of Inishmaan
Scandi-geeks descend on Nordicana for fan-convention
Female aristocrats battle to inherit the title


