Eurobonds scandal: You can blame the tax avoiders. But the Government’s the real villain

At the same time as HMRC complains about avoidance, it is creating fresh loopholes

Share

You would expect HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) to know the A to Z of tax avoidance in great detail. After all, it and its predecessor bodies have been collecting taxes since the 17th century. Its immediate forerunner, the Inland Revenue, was created in 1849. It must have an encyclopaedic knowledge of every tax avoidance device ever used.

Why, then, does it preside over a system full of loopholes, with tax revenues draining away at a thousand points? The tax gap, which measures the difference between what should have been collected and what has actually been received, currently stands at 7 per cent of the tax due, a sum of £35bn.

One of the major reasons is well illustrated by the special investigation that The Independent has been publishing this week into the “Eurobond tax scandal”. The series reminds us that governments knowingly distort their tax systems in order to gain competitive advantage in international trade. Last year, for instance, Treasury ministers were trumpeting Britain’s tax advantages in Washington. The US is the biggest source of companies considering moving to Britain for tax reasons. Ernst & Young, the professional services firm, reported last year that Britain was successfully competing with low-tax countries such as Switzerland and Singapore.

So HMRC finds itself having to be responsive to two conflicting requirements – collect the maximum tax possible yet avoid damaging the international competitiveness of Britain as a place to do business. And a perfectly good example is indeed the so-called “quoted Eurobond exemption” that goes back to 1984. The Government of the day introduced the loophole in order to make UK companies more attractive to foreign lenders looking to reduce their tax bills. It works like this.

When a UK company pays interest to an overseas lender it would usually have to send 20 per cent straight to HMRC. The exemption allowed banks and other investors to receive the interest without the deduction if they lent their money through buying bonds via a “recognised” stock exchange, such as the Channel Islands or the Cayman Islands. In effect, the Government had made HMRC complicit in tax avoidance.

What Government ministers rarely envisage, however, is how clever accountants and lawyers will develop a government-created loophole into something that goes much further than intended. In this case, what the experts did was to turn the quoted Eurobond exemption on its head.

In groups comprising British and foreign registered companies, a common structure, they would cause one of the foreign entities to make loans to the major British company in the group – so that its tax liability could be substantially reduced by offsetting the interest it is now paying on a loan that it didn’t need! I know this sounds crazy, but that is how it is done.

HMRC finally calculated a few years ago that it was losing some £200m a year from these manoeuvres. The Independent believes that the actual sum is nearer £500m. Nevertheless, HMRC recently decided to hold a consultation on reforms that could be made to reduce the tax loss. The respondents were overwhelmingly financial firms, companies using the legal loophole, and major accountancy companies.

This is exactly like a householder deciding to consult with assorted burglars and thieves about plans to enhance the security of his or her residence. The burglars didn’t think it would be a good idea! Let us go through the responses HMRC received in this light. The first objection to the proposed reforms was that the changes would “add to compliance costs, as businesses sought to restructure existing arrangements”. That is, it would cost the burglars money.

A second objection is technical in nature, but a translation can be supplied. In the original language it reads: “The positive Exchequer effect (in other words the extra tax that would be collected) was questioned by respondents who expressed the view that treaty relief (see below) would often be available in cases where the exemption was currently used”. “Treaty relief” refers to double taxation treaties between pairs of countries that are designed to prevent paying tax twice on a single transaction. Or, in burglars’ language, “even if you install new locks, we know of another way to break in”.

HMRC described a third objection: that firms would devise securities that had the same tax liability-reducing characteristics as loans without actually being loans. In other words, the burglars would disguise themselves as, say, coming to read the householder’s gas meter in order to gain entrance and make off with some booty.

I am not, however, inclined to accuse HMRC of naivety in the way it conducted its farcical consultation – from which it concluded, by the way, that it would make no reforms to the exemption. It could see tax receipts draining away, it acknowledged a duty to consider putting a stop to the leak, but it has a Government on its back that is intent on making Britain into a sort of tax haven.

Nor do I criticise the companies named by The Independent that have taken out loans with the sole purpose of reducing their tax bills. For their common characteristic is that they are not really in charge of their own destinies. All are owned by private equity firms, or by the giant Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board that behaves like one. Private equity firms are extremely active investors.

They take full control of poorly performing companies so that their shares are no longer quoted on the Stock Exchange. As a result, these companies escape the often debilitating need to report their results every quarter, which in turn encourages managements to act tactically rather than strategically. Instead, private equity firms set about making long-term improvements, before eventually selling off their holding back to the investing public – at a substantial profit. It is the private equity firms that insist on using the quoted Eurobond exemption to reduce tax bills, rather than the companies they own.

So are the private equity firms really the villains of the piece? Again, I don’t believe so. For they in turn work for large investors who supply the capital they deploy. And to these large investors, private equity firms owe a fiduciary duty, which is legally and prudently to maximize their returns. So if the Government itself supplies a loophole that allows tax to be saved, then the private equity firms are more less obliged to use it, for to do so is both a legal and a prudent method of serving investors’ interests.

No, the guilty party is plain to see. It is not Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs; it is Her Majesty’s Government itself. In a typically muddled fashion, devoid of principle, it goes about chasing tax avoiders and evaders, making a song and dance as it proceeds, while also quietly manufacturing fresh tax exemptions. So as you walk along the high street and pass Maplin Electronics; Pizza Express, Zizzi; Ask; Pets at Home; Pret à Manger; Nando’s; Café Rouge, Bella Italia; Strada; and BHS; reflect that each one of these is not paying the tax it should – by kind permission of Her Majesty’s Government.

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Recruitment Genius: Business Manager

£32000 - £40000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Business Manager is required ...

Recruitment Genius: Operations Manager

£45000 - £55000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an exciting opportunity...

Recruitment Genius: Panel & Cabinet Wireman

£20000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Panel Wireman required for small electro...

Recruitment Genius: Electronics Test Engineer

£25000 - £27000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An SME based in East Cheshire, ...

Day In a Page

Read Next
Newspaper stands have been criticised by the Child Eyes campaign  

There were more reader complaints this year – but, then again, there were more readers

Will Gore
 

People drink to shut out pain and stress. Arresting them won’t help

Deborah Coughlin
A timely reminder of the bloody anniversary we all forgot

A timely reminder of the bloody anniversary we all forgot

Who remembers that this week we enter the 150th anniversary year of the end of the American Civil War, asks Robert Fisk
Homeless Veterans appeal: Former soldiers pay their respects to a friend who also served

Homeless Veterans appeal

Former soldiers pay their respects to a friend who also served
Downfall of Dustin 'Screech' Diamond, the 'Saved By The Bell' star charged with bar stabbing

Scarred by the bell

The downfall of the TV star charged with bar stabbing
Why 2014 was a year of technological let-downs

Why 2014 was a year of technological let-downs

Security breaches and overhyped start-ups dominated a year in which very little changed (save the size of your phone)
Cuba's golf revolution: But will the revolutionary nation take 'bourgeois' game to its heart?

Will revolutionary Cuba take 'bourgeois' golf to its heart?

Fidel Castro ridiculed the game – but now investment in leisure resort projects is welcome
The Locked Room Mysteries: As a new collection of the genre’s best is published, its editor Otto Penzler explains the rules of engagement

The Locked Room Mysteries

As a new collection of the genre’s best is published, its editor explains the rules of engagement
Amy Adams on playing painter Margaret Keane in Tim Burton's Big Eyes

How I made myself Keane

Amy Adams hadn’t wanted to take the role of artist Margaret Keane, because she’d had enough of playing victims. But then she had a daughter, and saw the painter in a new light
Ed Richards: Parting view of Ofcom chief. . . we hate jokes on the disabled

Parting view of Ofcom chief... we hate jokes on the disabled

Bad language once got TV viewers irate, inciting calls to broadcasting switchboards. But now there is a worse offender, says retiring head of the media watchdog, Ed Richards
A look back at fashion in 2014: Wear in review

Wear in review

A look back at fashion in 2014
Ian Herbert: My 10 hopes for sport in 2015. Might just one of them happen?

Ian Herbert: My 10 hopes for sport in 2015

Might just one of them happen?
War with Isis: The West needs more than a White Knight

The West needs more than a White Knight

Despite billions spent on weapons, the US has not been able to counter Isis's gruesome tactics, says Patrick Cockburn
Return to Helmand: Private Davey Graham recalls the day he was shot by the Taliban

'The day I was shot by the Taliban'

Private Davey Graham was shot five times during an ambush in 2007 - it was the first, controversial photograph to show the dangers our soldiers faced in Helmand province
Revealed: the best and worst airlines for delays

Revealed: the best and worst airlines for delays

Many flyers are failing to claim compensation to which they are entitled, a new survey has found
The stories that defined 2014: From the Scottish independence referendum to the Ice Bucket Challenge, our writers voice their opinions

The stories that defined 2014

From the Scottish independence referendum to the Ice Bucket Challenge, our writers voice their opinions
Stoke-on-Trent becomes first British city to be classified as 'disaster resilient' by the United Nations

Disaster looming? Now you know where to head...

Which British city has become the first to be awarded special 'resilience' status by the UN?