How much you spend on a haircut holds the key to maintaining a stable economy in an era of low inflation

Central banks will in future rely less on interest rates to try to stop bubbles

 

Share

The stories are starting to come through about the seemingly odd questions people are being asked if they want a mortgage. Are they a member of a golf club? How much do they spend on a haircut? How much pocket money do their children get? And so on.

These are the result – you might think the rather cack-handed result – of a change in regulation. Whereas in the past a bank or building society looked at the loan-to-value ratio of the mortgage and the income of the person seeking it, now they have a duty of care to try to see that the borrower is being prudent. These lifestyle questions have been triggered by a review by the Financial Conduct Authority, and the aim is the admirable one of trying to make sure that people don’t take out loans they can’t pay back.

The Financial Conduct Authority is not to be confused with the Financial Policy Committee, the new body at the Bank of England set up in parallel to the Monetary Policy Committee. Put crudely, the object of the former is to prevent financial companies screwing their customers, whereas the aim of the latter is to stop them causing a new bubble, and hence cut the chances of going bust. One is the retail regulator, the other the wholesale one.

The two bodies, however, come together in their impact on the housing market, with wider consequences for the economy. If the FCA is successful in making sure that lenders are really careful when they make loans, that will to some extent damp down the house-price boom. That would make life easier for the FPC, which we know is worried about the housing market – or rather, if it isn’t it jolly well should be because you can’t have house prices going up by 11 per cent a year for ever. The Bank Governor, Mark Carney, has been warning about house prices since last August, with zero impact so far.

If the FPC does decide to act, it can force lenders to insist on higher loan-to-value ratios. But that may not have much effect, because most loans are well-covered by the value of the house, with 90 per cent mortgages accounting for only 2.2 per cent of the market. As Capital Economics points out in a note this week, cash transactions account for one-third of house purchases. Does the Help to Buy scheme make matters worse? Well, a bit, but it is tiny in the context of the housing market. Between October and the end of January it helped only 2,572 sales. There are a million home sales a year in the UK.

So it is hard to escape the conclusion that the only sure-fire way of holding down house prices is higher interest rates, and that the promise by central banks to keep money cheap is helping to push them up.

That leads to the great dilemma in central banking here and elsewhere. Economic conditions warrant cheap money. Low (in Europe very low) inflation justifies that policy. But asset inflation everywhere threatens long-term stability. Thus Germany has 0.5 per cent inflation at a consumer level but Berlin property is booming. What should the central banks do?

We will get some more ideas about the Bank of England’s concerns in the new Inflation Report to be published today, but the wider dilemma is highlighted in a paper from the economics team at HSBC, titled The Great Central Banking Revolution. Its central idea is that inflation targeting failed to provide long-term stability, but using macro-prudential policy alongside inflation targeting will help.

This won’t be easy. One of the most effective ways of stopping asset bubbles in the past has been a cap on lending. But thanks to the flood of money that the central banks have created, capping lending will not have as much impact as before – with the UK housing market an example of that. The HSBC team thinks that the effect will be that central banks will in future rely less on interest rates to try to stop bubbles. If that is right, the UK will be a test case.

There is something else. We will move to a society where banks have a good excuse to say no. Of course they will want to lend because that is how they will make their money, but they will be under regulatory pressure to be cautious. The result will be much more like the society of the Fifties and Sixties, where companies that have cash will be much better placed to take investment opportunities than those who have to borrow it. As for individuals, well, if you want a mortgage you will have to present yourself as a cautious, prudent citizen – and maybe give up golf.

Not such a risky business

Risk appetite. This is the expression you hear more and more about these days, and it is trotted out as the explanation for extremely strong stock-market performance, particularly in the US. It is certainly fascinating, when you consider all the bad news that has been thrown out – including the breakdown of relations with Russia – that Wall Street keeps hitting new highs. European shares have been stunningly strong, too, given that recovery has barely begun in much of Southern Europe.

And in the UK? We have a strong recovery, but the global concerns remain. Yet the FTSE 100 index is close to a five-year high and it is possible that the last peak, reached so long ago at the end of 1999, will be breached this year.

But is it really risk appetite, or is it desperation? Do investors want to take on more risks or do they want to escape the very low yields available on bonds and cash? Anything is better than leaving money in a bank.

Of course, it must be a bit of both, but it is hard to identify, at least outside the US, any real desire among investors to take on risk. There are plenty of arguments for caution, including the fact that on most historical measurements shares are pretty highly valued.

There is, however, one further twist. It is that we positively need high share prices to sustain the recovery. Companies need to be able to go to the market for investment funds. They need to improve the position of their pension liabilities. So the authorities cannot afford to allow another market crash. If the Bank of England and the European Central Bank won’t print the money, the Fed will.

It is a dangerous argument. But it is sustaining the markets right now.

h.mcrae@independent.co.uk

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Recruitment Genius: Frontend Developer / Designer

£20000 - £30000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: You will be working on a range ...

Ashdown Group: Software Developer - C#, .Net, SQL - Cambridgeshire

£30000 - £40000 per annum + benefits: Ashdown Group: A highly successful and g...

Recruitment Genius: Financial Controller

£40000 - £45000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A fantastic opening has arisen ...

Recruitment Genius: Office Manager / Financial Services

£30000 - £37000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Established in 1999, a highly r...

Day In a Page

Read Next
Kanye West performs live at the Brit Awards 2015  

UK grime is finally getting the recognition it deserves, but why has it taken so long?

Paul Gibbins
 

Jihadi John went to my university – so what?

James Tennent
HIV pill: Scientists hail discovery of 'game-changer' that cuts the risk of infection among gay men by 86%

Scientists hail daily pill that protects against HIV infection

Breakthrough in battle against global scourge – but will the NHS pay for it?
How we must adjust our lifestyles to nature: Welcome to the 'Anthropocene', the human epoch

Time to play God

Welcome to the 'Anthropocene', the human epoch where we may need to redefine nature itself
MacGyver returns, but with a difference: Handyman hero of classic 1980s TV series to be recast as a woman

MacGyver returns, but with a difference

Handyman hero of classic 1980s TV series to be recast as a woman
Tunnel renaissance: Why cities are hiding roads down in the ground

Tunnel renaissance

Why cities are hiding roads underground
'Backstreet Boys - Show 'Em What You're Made Of': An affectionate look at five middle-aged men

Boys to men

The Backstreet Boys might be middle-aged, married and have dodgy knees, but a heartfelt documentary reveals they’re not going gently into pop’s good night
Crufts 2015: Should foreign dogs be allowed to compete?

Crufts 2015

Should foreign dogs be allowed to compete?
10 best projectors

How to make your home cinema more cinematic: 10 best projectors

Want to recreate the big-screen experience in your sitting room? IndyBest sizes up gadgets to form your film-watching
Manchester City 1 Barcelona 2 player ratings: Luis Suarez? Lionel Messi? Joe Hart? Who was the star man?

Manchester City vs Barcelona player ratings

Luis Suarez? Lionel Messi? Joe Hart? Who was the star man at the Etihad?
Arsenal vs Monaco: Monaco - the making of Gunners' manager Arsene Wenger

Monaco: the making of Wenger

Jack Pitt-Brooke speaks to former players and learns the Frenchman’s man-management has always been one of his best skills
Cricket World Cup 2015: Chris Gayle - the West Indies' enigma lives up to his reputation

Chris Gayle: The West Indies' enigma

Some said the game's eternal rebel was washed up. As ever, he proved he writes the scripts by producing a blistering World Cup innings
In Ukraine a dark world of hybrid warfare and murky loyalties prevails

In Ukraine a dark world of hybrid warfare

This war in the shadows has been going on since the fall of Mr Yanukovych
'Birdman' and 'Bullets Over Broadway': Homage or plagiarism?

Homage or plagiarism?

'Birdman' shares much DNA with Woody Allen's 'Bullets Over Broadway'
Broadchurch ends as damp squib not even David Tennant can revive

A damp squib not even David Tennant can revive

Broadchurch, Series 2 finale, review
A Koi carp breeding pond, wall-mounted iPads and a bathroom with a 'wellness' shower: inside the mansion of Germany's 'Bishop of Bling'

Inside the mansion of Germany's 'Bishop of Bling'

A Koi carp breeding pond, wall-mounted iPads and a bathroom with a 'wellness' shower