If I were elected PM, I might be a bit concerned. Is the country really sure they want to elect a leader who naps frequently, doesn’t know how to play Candy Crush in a committee meeting or how to reach the world’s most popular dictators on speed dial? Really? Well, in that case...
Powerful leaders have a tendency towards megalomania so to guard against any future dictatorial tantrums a cabinet comprised of pragmatic, strong-willed team players with expertise in the relevant ministry would be first. A government should reflect its people. So immediately reforming the way that Parliament operates, to allow for a working life which encourages older people, disabled people, parents of young children, and those without the most privileged start in life, would be a start.
Parliament will also be moved to a remote, yet roughly central area in England ensuring that those travelling there to work understand the urgency of improving public transport.
Rather than focusing on one particular policy area such as social security, defence or education, I would also look to change the way we view, plan and deliver public services. Rigidly imposed "fixes" designed by politicians, usually with no relevant experience of those services, don’t work well. Focusing on the person seeking help, and offering them solutions relevant to their lives rather than those the system permits, produces better value public services, as well as happier front line staff. It also allows individuals to actually gain some control over their own lives.
The House of Lords is an anachronism, but an elected second chambers would only serve to further politicise a process which should be about expert scrutiny and careful reflection. I’d ensure partisan former politicians cannot outvote the rest of the House which will be comprised of People’s Peers. Applications will be particularly encouraged from those with front line experience – cleaners, carers, teachers, small business people and the like.
There would probably be no agreement from the cabinet about whether it’s more important to reduce what we owe in debt or the difference between our country’s outgoings and incomings. But as we are all settling into our new roles as power holders we'd still congratulate ourselves for knowing the difference between debt and deficit.
Election Analysis: The Key Voters
Election Analysis: The Key Voters
1/6 Settled Silvers
These are the comfortably-off over-60s, still in work or drawing a decent pension – or both – who are enjoying their entitlements such as the Winter Fuel Allowance, free bus passes and free TV licence. They are worried about immigration and Europe. Both the Conservatives – who are pledging to keep benefits for wealthier pensioners – and Ukip want their votes
2/6 Squeezed Semis
Slightly older than the Harassed Hipsters, they are the second key group for Labour’s family-focused election strategy. They are married couples on low to middle incomes who own unpretentious semi-detached homes in suburban areas. In 2001, these were the Pebbledash People sought by the Conservatives. Now the pebbledash is gone and a modest conservatory has been built at the back
3/6 Aldi Woman
In 1997 and 2001 she was Worcester Woman – a middle-class Middle Englander shopping at Marks & Spencer and Waitrose. Today, the age of austerity means she still goes to Waitrose for her basic food shop but cannily switches to Aldi for her luxury bargains such as Parma ham and prosecco. Identified by Caroline Flint, she is a key target of both Labour and the Conservatives
4/6 Glass Ceiling Woman
In her thirties or forties, she has an established career under her belt, perhaps in the “marzipan layer” – one position below the still male-dominated senior executive level. She is now, according to Nick Clegg, forced into making the “heart-breaking choice” between staying at home to bring up her children and going to work and forking out for high-cost, round-the-clock childcare
5/6 Harassed Hipsters
One of the two key groups identified by Labour as crucial to hand Ed Miliband the keys to Downing Street. Well-paid professional couples, often with children, they live in diverse urban and metropolitan areas rather than the suburbs. More comfortably off than most swing voters, they are time poor – struggling to balance raising a young family with busy work schedules
These are mainly first-time voters, though some are in their twenties – students and digital-age generation renters helping to fuel the “Green Surge”. Idealists, but with no tribal loyalty to any party, they are anti-austerity, middle class, living in urban areas. Despite studying at university or recently graduated, they are struggling to find decent jobs and want cheaper housing and a higher minimum wage
There’s a general suspicion that tax evaders might have some spare funds so, bearing in mind that benefit fraud is less than 1 per cent of the overall bill, the majority of DWP fraud investigators are to be transferred to HMRC and retrained as tax evasion investigators.
Having also remembered that borrowing is currently cheap, the government will invest in building homes. All will conform to lifetime homes standards, meaning they are easy to convert for disabled access, and are family friendly and energy efficient.
Paid, vocational apprenticeships will be widely used to ensure employment increases and ensure Britain has the skills and opportunities we need for a strong future. More young people in paid training means a stronger economy, as more can spend and participate.
Social care will also become free at the point of use, enabling more disabled people to consider employment and allowing unpaid carers to enter the workforce if they wish. What's more, strong training schemes and living pay for apprenticeships transforms "caring" into a fairly paid, attractive profession.
A Britain seeking to truly be great again must start by remembering what that means – tolerance, equality, social security and opportunity for all.Reuse content