It would be so much fun to say that Roy Jenkins remade Britain in his own degenerate image. The only problem is, it isn’t true

How glorious to make him a caricature of a decadent toff from ‘Brideshead Revisited’

Share

Readers of the Daily Mail must have enjoyed themselves over the past few days, flicking through the newspaper’s extracts from John Campbell’s biography of Roy Jenkins. For the benefit of younger readers, let me explain that Lord Jenkins of Hillhead was a British Home Secretary and Chancellor of the Exchequer who flourished in the 1960s and 1970s and was considered a colourful figure, with his Edwardian diction (complete with “Woy Jenkins” speech impediment), his fine biographies, his love of claret and his desertion of Labour in 1981 to help set up the Social Democratic Party.

Hardly any of his actual political life made it into the four long sections from the book that appeared in the Mail. The editors concentrated on his character, his sex life, his habits, his consumption of alcohol and food, and how he was too hedonistic to ever make prime minister. “The VERY permissive love life of the Father of Permissiveness,” bellowed the headline last Saturday, in that strangely camp, swishy, nosey, oh-ho-what-have-we-here? tone they use. “How Roy Jenkins, architect of the liberal society, had affairs with the wives of TWO close friends.” (TWO!! Of all the numbers of friends’ wives to choose to mess about with.) A few days later, they whacked the late politician, who died in 2003, with: “The Chateau Lafite socialist: how miner’s son Roy Jenkins swapped the Valleys for vintage claret and tennis parties with the aristocracy – to the disgust of many of his party.”

Was it disgust, or just amusement? Was it “many” of his party, or just a few malcontents who resented his fondness for enjoying himself and doing so as much as possible? I’m not sure a biographer, even one as even-handed as John Campbell, could say for certain. Reading the published extracts, you notice a considerable disconnect between the attitude to Jenkins displayed by his biographer and his critics’ attitude of scorching disapproval. It’s entertaining to imagine which bits they will enjoy (what a bastard!) and which ones, inconveniently, show him in a good light.

Jenkins was born to a mining family in Pontypool. It would suit the purposes of his detractors to say he “turned his back” on his humble beginnings and family tradition by refusing to go down the mines himself, the nasty little class traitor. Unfortunately, it’s not true. His dad Arthur, though a miner, rose to become a union official, a county councillor, an MP and PPS to Clement Attlee, and never expected his son to go near a mine. (Damn!)

It would be handy if his dad had been a rough, unpolished chap without education or manners, so that Roy could be said to have “turned his back” on him. Sadly, Arthur won a scholarship to Oxford, later used to entertain senior Labour colleagues and cabinet ministers for the weekend, and was keen on taxis and hotels, which is where Roy got it from. (Grrrr!)

It would be glorious to say that, at Oxford in 1938, Roy indulged himself with Balkan Sobranie fags, expansive Chateau Margaux claret and unbridled gay sex, so that, basically, he becomes a caricature of a louche, decadent toff from Brideshead Revisited. Unfortunately, it wasn’t quite like that. He tried the posh fags and the claret (as many young students do, if they can get them) but he couldn’t afford to drink regularly until after the war. And his brief fling with the flamboyantly gay Tony Crosland (who Roy later said had seduced him “at least once”) was an experimental moment in his life, shortly before he met his wife, Jennifer, to whom he stayed married for 50 years. (God, how annoying!)

It would be ace to think that, as an MP, he shocked fellow MPs by his life of sybaritism and squire-like selfishness while sitting in a palatial dwelling in Notting Hill. But it’s not quite true. Bill Rodgers MP, came to lunch in 1956, noted he was being offered sherry and brandy and said: “It’s so different from the environment of most Labour supporters (as also 99 per cent of the population).” True – but not shocking. And Notting Hill in 1956 was about as glamorous as Tower Hamlets.

It would be splendid to call him “the architect of the permissive society”, the man who oversaw the legalisation of homosexuality and abortion, and suggest it was a reflection of his “permissive” life of love affairs, degeneracy and carelessness about other people. But his legal reforms were nothing to do with his lifestyle. They were designed to free people everywhere from being criminalised by their nature or their circumstances. He gave people in all walks of life legal “permission” to follow their sexual instincts and control their physical destiny.

Amazingly, even after four days of extracts focusing on salacity and wrongdoing, Lord Jenkins comes out among the good guys. (Bugger!)

Come on Egypt, it’s time to say sorry to the Israelites

I see that more apologies are being demanded for tragic unfoldings of history. The most recent is a coalition of Caribbean countries (Caricom) which is demanding that former slaving nations – among them Britain, France, Spain, Portugal and Holland – should pay reparations for the “enduring legacy” of the slave trade in islands with health and economic problems. They want a formal apology from current heads of state, financial damages (unspecified), more development aid money and the cancelling of debts.

It’s interesting that, to argue their case, the Caricom collective is using the same British law firm that won £20m for Kenyan people tortured by the British and others in the 1950s Mau Mau imbroglio. But where will the paper-trail of blame stop? Slavery didn’t originate in the West Indies. European slavers sailed to Africa, picked up slaves there and shipped them to the Caribbean to work in the sugar fields. Should Europe apologise to whichever African nations were thus abused?

And while we’re in the African continent, has Egypt apologised sufficiently for enslaving the Israelites for 400 years? Or is that a spurious factoid from the Bible? And who can we get to apologise for that?

The Wars of the Roses were 500 years ago, right?

There’s important stuff going on in the High Court today. A shadowy organisation called the Plantagenet Alliance will take sides against a bunch of archaeologists from Leicester University over which has the right to bury a skeleton in their county turf. Ever since they found the bony departed under a council car park in Leicester in 2012, this deeply silly debate has raged, simply to resurrect the Wars of the Roses between the houses of York and Lancaster (Leicester used to be Lancastrian.) Unbelievably, a two-day judicial review will start today over whether the burial licence should be revoked.

Surely, if you’re going to drag up the past like this, the answer is simple. Richard III was killed at Bosworth Field. The Lancastrians won the battle. It should be up to them how they dispose of the enemy’s remains. And can both sides now please go back to dressing up and playing jousting games on Sunday afternoons without bothering the law?

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Ashdown Group: Helpdesk Analyst

£25000 per annum: Ashdown Group: An established media firm based in Surrey is ...

Ashdown Group: Java Developer - Hertfordshire - £47,000 + bonus + benefits

£40000 - £470000 per annum + bonus: Ashdown Group: Java Developer / J2EE Devel...

Ashdown Group: Head of Finance - Financial Director - London - £70,000

£70000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Head of Finance - Financial Controller - Fina...

Recruitment Genius: Business Development Executive - Nationwide - OTE £65,000

£30000 - £65000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This small technology business ...

Day In a Page

Read Next
Ice skating in George Square, Glasgow  

How many Christmas cards have you sent this year?

Simon Kelner
 

Al-Sweady Inquiry: An exercise in greed that blights the lives of brave soldiers

Richard Kemp
Jeb Bush vs Hillary Clinton: The power dynamics of the two first families

Jeb Bush vs Hillary Clinton

Karen Tumulty explores the power dynamics of the two first families
Stockholm is rivalling Silicon Valley with a hotbed of technology start-ups

Scandi crush: Stockholm is rivalling Silicon Valley

Th Swedish capital is home to two of the most popular video games in the world, as well as thousands of technology start-ups worth hundreds of millions of pounds – and it's all happened since 2009
Did Japanese workers really get their symbols mixed up and display Santa on a crucifix?

Crucified Santa: Urban myth refuses to die

The story goes that Japanese store workers created a life-size effigy of a smiling "Father Kurisumasu" attached to a facsimile of Our Lord's final instrument of torture
La Famille Bélier is being touted as this year's Amelie - so why are many in the deaf community outraged by it?

Deaf community outraged by La Famille Bélier

The new film tells the story of a deaf-mute farming family and is being touted as this year's Amelie
Calls for a military mental health 'quality mark'

Homeless Veterans campaign

Expert calls for military mental health 'quality mark'
Racton Man: Analysis shows famous skeleton was a 6ft Bronze Age superman

Meet Racton Man

Analysis shows famous skeleton was a 6ft Bronze Age superman
Garden Bridge: St Paul’s adds to £175m project’s troubled waters

Garden Bridge

St Paul’s adds to £175m project’s troubled waters
Stuff your own Christmas mouse ornament: An evening class in taxidermy with a festive feel

Stuff your own Christmas mouse ornament

An evening class in taxidermy with a festive feel
Joint Enterprise: The legal doctrine which critics say has caused hundreds of miscarriages of justice

Joint Enterprise

The legal doctrine which critics say has caused hundreds of miscarriages of justice
Freud and Eros: Love, Lust and Longing at the Freud Museum: Objects of Desire

Freud and Eros

Love, Lust and Longing at the Freud Museum
France's Front National and the fear of a ‘gay lobby’ around Marine Le Pen

Front National fear of ‘gay lobby’

Marine Le Pen appoints Sébastien Chenu as cultural adviser
'Enhanced interrogation techniques?' When language is distorted to hide state crimes

Robert Fisk on the CIA 'torture report'

Once again language is distorted in order to hide US state wrongdoing
Radio 1’s new chart host must placate the Swifties and Azaleans

Radio 1 to mediate between the Swifties and Azaleans

New chart host Clara Amfo must placate pop's fan armies
Homeless Veterans appeal: 'It's life, and not the Forces, that gets you'

Homeless Veterans appeal: 'It's life, and not the Forces, that gets you'

The head of Veterans Aid on how his charity is changing perceptions of ex-servicemen and women in need
Torture: It didn't work then, it doesn't work now

Torture: It didn't work then, it doesn't work now

Its use is always wrong and, despite CIA justifications post 9/11, the information obtained from it is invariably tainted, argues Patrick Cockburn