What’s impressive about Thomas Piketty is his analysis not his politics

His book has become an unlikely bestseller, but his study of financial inequality is more than certain

 

Share

An unlikely entry has appeared recently at the top of the best-seller lists of books in the US. It is a work of economic history and theory written by a Frenchman, Thomas Piketty. Its title is Capital in the Twenty-First Century. It has been compared to such seminal works as The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith, Das Kapital by Karl Marx and The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money by John Maynard Keynes.

It is a strangely gripping book, partly because it highlights stretches of economic history that have relevance now. Piketty reminds us, for instance, that when Marx published the first volume of Das Kapital in 1867, the most striking fact of the day was the misery of the industrial proletariat. It was not until the second half – or even the final third – of the 19th century that a significant rise in the purchasing power of wages occurred. Looking back, that appears counter-intuitive. For the first half of the 19th century was precisely the period when Britain’s industrial revolution took off. A failure to share wealth at such a propitious time puts into context the stagnation of purchasing power that most people experience today.

Above all, it is the unchanging features of capitalism that Piketty is concerned to illustrate. In particular he sets out to answer the question of whether the dynamics of private capital accumulation inevitably lead to the concentration of wealth in ever fewer hands. In other words, is there some inbuilt, irreversible momentum in the system, as Marx believed, that means that we can never escape from large inequalities in wealth?

Yes, is the author’s answer, and he expressed it as a law rather like one of Newton’s laws of motion. Thus, Piketty states – and this is the most important sentence in the book – “When the rate of return on capital exceeds the rate of growth of output and income, as it did in the 19th century and seems quite likely to do again in the 21st century, capitalism automatically generates arbitrary and unsustainable inequalities.”

So what is the return on capital? It is the return you get from, say, a deposit with a building society, or from unit trusts, or from owning a flat that you rent out, or from a business you have established once you have paid yourself an appropriate salary. Over very long periods of time this has averaged 5 per cent per annum but I prefer to think in terms of a range of 3 per cent to 7 per cent. And the rate of growth of output and income? In the UK it is currently running at 2 per cent to 3 per cent per annum and is a bit above trend. Between 1990 and 2012, per capita output – and with it income – grew at an annual rate of 1.6 per cent in Western Europe, 1.4 per cent in North America and 0.7 per cent in Japan.

Here then is what the law really means in today’s terms. My salary is likely to rise at around 2 per cent per annum unless I change my job or I am promoted. But the value of a portfolio of shares, were I fortunate to own one, would be likely to rise by about 7 per cent per annum over time, comprising roughly 3 per cent of dividends and 4 per cent of profits that companies retain to fuel future expansion. Owning capital thus comfortably beats working, and almost always has done.

Note that when the author referred to the return on capital exceeding the growth of output and income, he adds the phrase, “as it did in the 19th century and seems quite likely to do again in the 21st century”. So what happened in the 20th century? Quite simply the following: the First World War, the Russian Revolution, the Great Depression, the Second World and, immediately afterwards, a forced redistribution of wealth in a number of European countries. At the same time capital and its income began to be taxed at significant rates. All these factors pushed the return on capital well below the growth of incomes so that disparities in wealth suddenly became much less severe.

The form of capitalism that emerged from the war years had also changed in two important respects. While the top 10 per cent of the population once owned 90 per cent of the wealth, now they found themselves sharing some of it with a new middle class, which in 2010 owned roughly 35 per cent of all capital. This is welcome. But much less acceptable has been an explosion of very high salaries in recent years. Once there were excessive concentrations of capital; now there are also excessive concentrations of income.

In fact the main countervailing forces for the reduction and compression of inequalities are the diffusion of knowledge and investment in training and skills. For these are the ways to increase the productivity of labour and thus its economic value. This is not, however, a market mechanism. It depends in large part on the educational and training policies of the government of the day. Piketty does not believe that this will be sufficient. So he recommends a global wealth tax. In practice, the chances of such a measure coming into force are close to zero. This utopian idea is the only disappointing aspect of a book that has been more thought-provoking than anything I have read for a long time.

Sir Alan Moses should remember what Fourth Estate means

It was almost inevitable that a senior member of the judiciary should be appointed as the first head of the new Independent Press Standards Organisation. The task has fallen to Sir Alan Moses, a member of the Court of Appeal. Appointing a judge is the ultimately safe choice. So rare are lapses in judicial behaviour that nobody would think of even looking for some shortcoming or other.

Moreover, the work of barristers and journalists shares some similarities, though no doubt the former would claim to work to higher standards of accuracy. But both have to “mug up” new subjects and situations from a standing start. Both must master the art of asking questions and assessing the answers. Both must know how create a compelling narrative or argument. The main difference is that the law is a profession whereas journalism is undoubtedly a trade.

It should work. Journalists have a natural respect for judges, either because their newspapers often appear in court as plaintiffs or defendants, or because they are regularly reporting court proceedings.

And for his part, Sir Alan should remember that we are the Fourth Estate in the sense first used by Edmund Burke, who said “there were Three Estates in Parliament (The Lords Spiritual, the Lords Temporal and the Commons); but, in the Reporters’ Gallery yonder, there sat a Fourth Estate more important far than they all.”

 

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Opilio Recruitment: QA Automation Engineer

£30k - 38k per year + Benefits: Opilio Recruitment: An award-winning consume...

Opilio Recruitment: UX & Design Specialist

£40k - 45k per year + Benefits: Opilio Recruitment: A fantastic opportunity ...

Opilio Recruitment: Publishing Application Support Analyst

£30k - 35k per year + Benefits: Opilio Recruitment: We’re currently re...

Opilio Recruitment: Digital Marketing Manager

£35k - 45k per year + benefits: Opilio Recruitment: A fantastic opportunity ...

Day In a Page

Read Next
A Pokot woman holds a razor blade after performing a circumcision on four girls  

The campaigns to end FGM are a welcomed step, but they don't go far enough

Charlotte Rachael Proudman
Our political system is fragmented, with disillusioned voters looking to the margins for satisfaction  

Politics of hope needed to avert flight to margins

Liam Fox
Homeless Veterans Christmas Appeal: ‘We give them hope. They come to us when no one else can help’

Christmas Appeal

Meet the charity giving homeless veterans hope – and who they turn to when no one else can help
Should doctors and patients learn to plan humane, happier endings rather than trying to prolong life?

Is it always right to try to prolong life?

Most of us would prefer to die in our own beds, with our families beside us. But, as a GP, Margaret McCartney sees too many end their days in a medicalised battle
Thomas Cook's outgoing boss Harriet Green got by on four hours sleep a night - is that what it takes for women to get to the top?

What does it take for women to get to the top?

Thomas Cook's outgoing boss Harriet Green got by on four hours sleep a night and told women they had to do more if they wanted to get on
Christmas jumper craze: Inside the UK factory behind this year's multicultural must-have

Knitting pretty: British Christmas Jumpers

Simmy Richman visits Jack Masters, the company behind this year's multicultural must-have
French chefs have launched a campaign to end violence in kitchens - should British restaurants follow suit?

French chefs campaign against bullying

A group of top chefs signed a manifesto against violence in kitchens following the sacking of a chef at a Paris restaurant for scalding his kitchen assistant with a white-hot spoon
Radio 4 to broadcast 10-hour War and Peace on New Year's Day as Controller warns of cuts

Just what you need on a New Year hangover...

Radio 4 to broadcast 10-hour adaptation of War and Peace on first day of 2015
Cuba set to stage its first US musical in 50 years

Cuba to stage first US musical in 50 years

Claire Allfree finds out if the new production of Rent will hit the right note in Havana
Christmas 2014: 10 best educational toys

Learn and play: 10 best educational toys

Of course you want them to have fun, but even better if they can learn at the same time
Paul Scholes column: I like Brendan Rodgers as a manager but Liverpool seem to be going backwards not forwards this season

Paul Scholes column

I like Brendan Rodgers as a manager but Liverpool seem to be going backwards not forwards this season
Lewis Moody column: Stuart Lancaster has made all the right calls – now England must deliver

Lewis Moody: Lancaster has made all the right calls – now England must deliver

So what must the red-rose do differently? They have to take the points on offer 
Cameron, Miliband and Clegg join forces for Homeless Veterans campaign

Cameron, Miliband and Clegg join forces for Homeless Veterans campaign

It's in all our interests to look after servicemen and women who fall on hard times, say party leaders
Millionaire Sol Campbell wades into wealthy backlash against Labour's mansion tax

Sol Campbell cries foul at Labour's mansion tax

The former England defender joins Myleene Klass, Griff Rhys Jones and Melvyn Bragg in criticising proposals
Nicolas Sarkozy returns: The ex-President is preparing to fight for the leadership of France's main opposition party – but will he win big enough?

Sarkozy returns

The ex-President is preparing to fight for the leadership of France's main opposition party – but will he win big enough?
Is the criticism of Ed Miliband a coded form of anti-Semitism?

Is the criticism of Miliband anti-Semitic?

Attacks on the Labour leader have coalesced around a sense that he is different, weird, a man apart. But is the criticism more sinister?
Ouija boards are the must-have gift this Christmas, fuelled by a schlock horror film

Ouija boards are the must-have festive gift

Simon Usborne explores the appeal - and mysteries - of a century-old parlour game