- News
- Video
- People
-
Voices
-
Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Max Benwell
- Chris Blackhurst
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Stefano Hatfield
- Lucy Hunter Johnston
- Howard Jacobson
- Alice Jones
- Ellen E Jones
- Comment
- Editorials
- Letters
- IV Drip
- Campaigns
- Archive
- Our Voices
- Commentators
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
- Blogs
- Scottish independence
- Save the tiger
- The state of the NHS
-
Find by writer
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts + Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Student
- Offers
Friday 28 September 2012
Why do we care about Megan Stammers from Eastbourne but not "Suzie" from Rochdale?
The authorities knew about the girls’ plight in Rochdale and did nothing. But every girl deserves to be respected, regardless of her background
We live in a society that is not terribly good at protecting young women. The same tabloid newspapers that spent this week making a show of searching the Continent for Megan Stammers routinely drool over the bodies of actors and singers barely out of training bras or send paparazzi to hound young women like Charlotte Church until they are forced to seek legal help. Magazines and billboards are plastered with nubile prepubescent-looking models while real prepubescents are turned away at police stations for reporting rape. There’s only one consistent message: young girls are not deemed to have any agency over their own bodies, or their own lives.
In this culture, young women are not treated as sexual beings, merely as sexual objects. The weary moral panic that crotch-flashing music videos and Playboy Bunny pencil cases are somehow “sexualising” young girls betrays the prejudice: female-bodied people can never really be sexual, only “sexualised”, and once they are tainted, once they start rolling up their school skirts and watching Rihanna grind her behind on YouTube, then the damage is done.
People who grow up being told that they have no agency are less likely to behave as though they do. Girls are imagined as constantly teetering on the edge of helpless harlotry, where what’s at stake is not their personhood, but their purity. Celebrities and middle-class girls, however, are tacitly assumed to be worthier of our anxiety than the teenage care-leavers who were the targets of grooming gangs in Rochdale and Rotherham.
When 15-year-old “Suzie” – not her real name – tried to tell police in Rochdale that she was being forced to have sex with strangers every night by a gang of adult men who controlled every aspect of her life, she was dismissed as a prostitute. “These men would be picking me up as soon as I got out of the school gates at three o’clock and taking me to houses,” “Suzie” told the BBC. “We’d go in and I’d basically be told to go into the bedroom and to take my pants off and they’d come in one after the other. Even my own dad rang social services to get help.”
Nobody, however, was prepared to help – neither the police nor social services. “Basically, they’d told my mum and dad that I was a prostitute and it was a lifestyle choice and that because I was only six months off turning 16 they wasn’t gonna do anything,” she said.
Young girls in deprived communities were written off. Yet, in very different circumstances, Megan Stammers, also 15, had every media outlet in the land publishing updates about her whereabouts and wellbeing until she showed up in Bordeaux yesterday.
The public was first made aware of child sex trafficking in Rochdale under headlines that screeched about “Asian sex gangs” and Islamic pederasty, but the stand-out fact here is that the authorities knew about these girls’ plight and did nothing. Systematic rape of children was ignored, not “in the interests of racial harmony”, as outlets like The Daily Telegraph continue to claim, but because the police and social services didn’t think the girls in question were worth protecting.
Police were ignoring this abuse because the victims were poor, because some of them were care-leavers, because they were assumed to be “wild” and out of control. Because they were not the sort of girls that the authorities usually care about, unless they’re out causing trouble. The axis of prejudice here is not race, but class.
Our collective anxiety about young girls and sex is far more Victorian than we would like to admit. It’s often more about protecting “innocence” than actually taking care of young people. When 15-year-old “Suzie”, frightened and hurt, spoke to the police about her situation, what did those Rochdale officers see? In all likelihood, they saw a girl from a deprived background who wasn’t “innocent” enough to be worth “saving” rather than a human being who deserved to be kept safe from harm and see her abusers face justice.
If women and girls are not truly respected as human beings with self-determination, sexual and otherwise, their consent cannot truly be respected, either – not when it is given, and not when it is violently taken away.
So we see young Megan from Eastbourne, naively making off with her schoolteacher, and “Suzie” from Rochdale, raped repeatedly for months by a brutal procession of strangers, as somehow equivalent – one is worth bothering about, and one was not.
We need to think again, and think hard, about how we understand agency, morality and consent, and recognise that whatever her social background, every girl deserves to have hers respected and treasured.
-
The Queen provides 'best moral leadership' for Britons - but Farage provides the worst
-
Former Bank of England governor claims Labour government not to blame for last financial crash
-
Twitter reacts to 'controversial' Top Gear: Patagonia Special ending
-
BBC Wales weatherman Owain Wyn Evans says he receives homophobic online abuse for his presenting style
-
Italy ferry fire: Rescued passengers describe violence and panic on board stricken vessel
-
Diana West End play 'suggests James Hewitt could be Prince Harry’s father'
Caribbean luxury at its finest
Barbados offers a new slice of holiday heaven at Port Ferdnand and Saint Peter's Bay Luxury Resorts
Rainbow list 2014: The LBGT people who make a real difference
Introducing our annual celebration of the lesbian, bisexual, gay, and transgender people who make a real difference
i100: Who makes your world a better place?
Tweet us the people who deserve some recognition to @thei100 with the hashtag #everydayhero and tell us why.
i100: How to take a wild career break and come back more employable
Fancy a wacky sabbatical?
Build yourself a brighter future
Chartered surveyors will be critical to shaping our new world
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Laurie Penny
-
It’s too late for Amanda Todd, but we must out the cyber-bullies
-
The Golden Dawn: A love of power and a hatred of difference on the rise in the cradle of democracy
-
The right time to debate abortion limits, or just the right time for a diversion?
-
The right time to debate abortion limits, or just the right time for a diversion?
iJobs General
Recruitment Genius: International Media Sales & Business Development Executive
£10000 - £45000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An international event marketin...
Recruitment Genius: Marketing Executive
£20000 - £25000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an exciting opportunity...
Recruitment Genius: Junior Property Manager
£13000 - £17000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Junior Property Manager in a yo...
Recruitment Genius: Web Development Manager
£20000 - £25000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A fantastic opportunity has ari...
Day In a Page
A timely reminder of the bloody anniversary we all forgot
The Locked Room Mysteries
How I made myself Keane
The West needs more than a White Knight
'The day I was shot by the Taliban'













