Why should poets engage with ‘ordinary people’? They don’t exist

Ordinary is just the word we use for the less intellectually sophisticated

Share

“The best part of human language, properly so called, is derived from reflection on the acts of the mind itself.” So wrote Coleridge in the great 17th chapter of Biographia Literaria that deals with his friend Wordsworth’s argument that the proper diction for poetry consisted in language taken from the mouths of men in real life, under the influence of natural feelings. The language, in Wordsworth’s own words, of men “in low and rustic life... because in that condition our feelings coexist in a state of greater simplicity... are more easily comprehended and more durable”. Tosh, said Coleridge. If anything, a country life, where it is not buttressed by education or original sensibility or both, must suffer from insufficient stimulus and is more likely to lead to a hardening and contraction of the mind. The best parts of language are the product of philosophers, not of clowns or shepherds. Clowns or shepherds! – ah, those, reader, were the days.

Because the argument cannot finally be settled, we’ve been having a version of it ever since, the pendulum swinging now in favour of the philosopher, now in favour of the poet, now in favour of difficulty, now in favour of simplicity, according to the mood of the times. Only recently, speaking after judging the 2014 Forward Prize for Poetry, Jeremy Paxman stirred the ashes of this old contention when he accused contemporary poets of seeming sometimes to be talking to one another instead of raising their sights and “engaging with ordinary” people.

If he didn’t go so far as to invoke the virtues of low and rustic life that’s because no one any longer does, but there’s a comparable sentimentality at work. The terms have changed. We cannot call a class of persons “low”. And it’s a while since we saw our society as divided along urban and rural lines. North and south yes, but that’s not an argument between thinkers and shepherds. Every village now hosts a literary festival. There are polytechnics, or what used to be called polytechnics, from the lecture rooms of which one can hear cowbells. A modern Coleridge would accept that it’s possible today to be provincial without being gross. But we still feel the need to distinguish between the intellectually sophisticated and the less so, and the word for the “less so” is “ordinary”. Scarcely a literary prize goes by now (scarcely an election either) in the course of which we don’t worry about the obligation of writers (and politicians) to satisfy the expectations of ordinary men and women, even if we aren’t sure who they are.

I will resist the obvious rejoinder – that you have only to look at the standard responses to books on the internet to see that there is no form of language basic enough, stripped sufficiently of subtlety or ambiguity, for some readers ever to understand. Are they the “ordinary people” whom poets should be aiming to please, or is there another intermediate group, people somewhat less ordinary – ordinary plus – in which case ordinary isn’t the word for them.

There remains truth, nonetheless, in Paxman’s charge that “poetry has connived at its own irrelevance”, though not quite the truth he intends. Tom Wolfe said something similar about contemporary novelists. Afraid to be chroniclers of their times, he argued, they sought refuge in obscurity and experimentation, thereby losing for the novel the great readership that Dickens once enjoyed. The Bonfire of the Vanities was Wolfe showing how it should be done. The only shame was that it wasn’t a better novel. What Wolfe the dandy journalist failed to understand was the element of marvellous irrelevance that the greatest art must always to some degree connive at.

Which doesn’t mean that writers should eschew the ambition to be universally understood, even if it’s impossible. When Dr Johnson wrote of rejoicing to concur with the common reader he was embracing an ideal – the common reader as philosophically conceived. Such a being might not in actuality exist but it’s writerly good manners to proceed as though he does. Ulysses pushes out the boat, but Finnegans Wake is an act of bad faith.

Concede even that much, however, and aggressive ordinariness will see its moment and take its revenge. What passes me by has failed, it will say, though everything but the message on a greetings card passes it by. And it’s then that the writer will bridle, reminding the complainant of the benefits of difficulty, of the part which struggling with texts plays in freeing minds that otherwise will harden and contract. As for poets talking to one another, that’s been going on ever since there were poets. It sharpens wits when it’s combative; it touches hearts when it eulogises or laments. Either way, there is pleasure in it for participants and spectators alike. Art is interlocutory, bound to be inward as well as outward looking – a reflection on art itself. And why, if these are benefits and pleasures, would we deny them to those whom we stigmatise even more than we indulge when we brand them “ordinary”?

I called once for a moratorium on the word “dream” – as in “I had a” – when all that’s meant by it is the desire to win Britain’s Got Talent. We don’t need a spacious word for a low ambition. The phrase “low ambition” will do just fine. I now propose a similar moratorium on the phrase “ordinary people”, for surely no person is never visited by the flame of the exceptional in one part of his being or another. If I’m wrong and there is indeed a dull soul for whom such visitations are neither conceivable nor welcome, then no artist should be measured against his blankness. He that will not rise to art cannot be reached by it.

I have no desire to pick a fight with Jeremy Paxman. He is the best there is. But what would he say to someone who told him he should raise his sights and try harder to engage with ordinary people? Be more like Susanna Reid, say, or Nigel Farage?

React Now

  • Get to the point
Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Recruitment Genius: Senior Digital Marketing Consultant

£28000 - £45000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Senior Digital Marketing Cons...

Recruitment Genius: Assistant Stores Keeper

£16640 - £18500 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An Assistant Stores Keeper is r...

Recruitment Genius: Claims Administrator

£16000 - £18500 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an excellent opportunit...

Recruitment Genius: Software Developer - C# / ASP.NET / SQL

£17000 - £30000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Developer required to join a bu...

Day In a Page

Read Next
 

Election catch-up: I’m not saying the Ed stone is bad – it is so terrible I am lost for words

John Rentoul
 

Election 2015: The SNP and an SMC (Salmond-Murdoch Conspiracy)

Matthew Norman
Fishing for votes with Nigel Farage: The Ukip leader shows how he can work an audience as he casts his line to the disaffected of Grimsby

Fishing is on Nigel Farage's mind

Ukip leader casts a line to the disaffected
Who is bombing whom in the Middle East? It's amazing they don't all hit each other

Who is bombing whom in the Middle East?

Robert Fisk untangles the countries and factions
China's influence on fashion: At the top of the game both creatively and commercially

China's influence on fashion

At the top of the game both creatively and commercially
Lord O’Donnell: Former cabinet secretary on the election and life away from the levers of power

The man known as GOD has a reputation for getting the job done

Lord O'Donnell's three principles of rule
Rainbow shades: It's all bright on the night

Rainbow shades

It's all bright on the night
'It was first time I had ever tasted chocolate. I kept a piece, and when Amsterdam was liberated, I gave it to the first Allied soldier I saw'

Bread from heaven

Dutch survivors thank RAF for World War II drop that saved millions
Britain will be 'run for the wealthy and powerful' if Tories retain power - Labour

How 'the Axe' helped Labour

UK will be 'run for the wealthy and powerful' if Tories retain power
Rare and exclusive video shows the horrific price paid by activists for challenging the rule of jihadist extremists in Syria

The price to be paid for challenging the rule of extremists

A revolution now 'consuming its own children'
Welcome to the world of Megagames

Welcome to the world of Megagames

300 players take part in Watch the Skies! board game in London
'Nymphomaniac' actress reveals what it was really like to star in one of the most explicit films ever

Charlotte Gainsbourg on 'Nymphomaniac'

Starring in one of the most explicit films ever
Robert Fisk in Abu Dhabi: The Emirates' out-of-sight migrant workers helping to build the dream projects of its rulers

Robert Fisk in Abu Dhabi

The Emirates' out-of-sight migrant workers helping to build the dream projects of its rulers
Vince Cable interview: Charging fees for employment tribunals was 'a very bad move'

Vince Cable exclusive interview

Charging fees for employment tribunals was 'a very bad move'
Iwan Rheon interview: Game of Thrones star returns to his Welsh roots to record debut album

Iwan Rheon is returning to his Welsh roots

Rheon is best known for his role as the Bastard of Bolton. It's gruelling playing a sadistic torturer, he tells Craig McLean, but it hasn't stopped him recording an album of Welsh psychedelia
Russell Brand's interview with Ed Miliband has got everyone talking about The Trews

Everyone is talking about The Trews

Russell Brand's 'true news' videos attract millions of viewers. But today's 'Milibrand' interview introduced his resolutely amateurish style to a whole new crowd
Morne Hardenberg interview: Cameraman for BBC's upcoming show Shark on filming the ocean's most dangerous predator

It's time for my close-up

Meet the man who films great whites for a living