A punishment to fit the crime

Last week's ruling which could soon free the killers of James Bulger shows that our attitude to the child murderers has matured

Share

In the United States, they're used to children killing children. Even in Canada, where I've spent the past week, there have been traumatic cases - a girl murdered by schoolfriends in sedate Victoria, for example. The Bulger story fascinates North Americans, none the less, and its latest chapter has been widely reported here, but they're not sure what to make of it.

In the United States, they're used to children killing children. Even in Canada, where I've spent the past week, there have been traumatic cases - a girl murdered by schoolfriends in sedate Victoria, for example. The Bulger story fascinates North Americans, none the less, and its latest chapter has been widely reported here, but they're not sure what to make of it.

In Britain, in the aftermath of the trial seven years ago, people seemed certain what to think. The tabloids felt confident enough of the popular mood to demonise the boys and, in the case of the Sun, to campaign for them to be left to rot in jail for life. But for anyone who sat through the month-long trial, as I did, dismissing the boys as irredeemably evil wasn't so easy. Observing their behaviour in court, listening to the tapes of interviews with the police, hearing expert witnesses under cross-examination, and learning facts about the boys' backgrounds that couldn't be admitted as evidence, all this raised doubts in our minds as to how far Robert Thompson and Jon Venablescould be held fully accountable for their crime of killing James Bulger, and if they merited a 15-year sentence.

Albert Kirby, who headed the police investigation, believed and still believes that the murder was premeditated and that the boys orchestrated it with adult cunning. I've great respect for Albert Kirby but I think he's wrong. When the pair walked James Bulger more than two miles to the railway line in Walton, they weren't taking him to some remote spot where they could "get away with it" but returning to their own neighbourhood. Their behaviour was panicky and confused. A childish dare had become reality and left them with a crying toddler on their hands. The murder, though horrendous, belonged to the world of disturbed childhood fantasy. In what they did, they acted like 10-year-olds.

But they must have known what they were doing, people say. And, of course, at one level they did know: the fact that they tried to conceal the murder was used as evidence in court that they understood the difference between right and wrong. But Thompson, for all his knowingness, asked the police if James had been taken to hospital "to make him alive again", and Venables used to cry when watching films because he "thought they were real". The boys were streetwise but also naïve. They had August birthdays and were so far behind their peer group, academically, that they were held down a year. Physically, neither was tall. Emotionally, both were immature. They knew what they were doing and yet they didn't; certainly not as an adult would.

The decision last week by the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf, to reinstate the original recommended sentence of eight years is a recognition of that. The Bulger family deplore the decision; in their position anyone would. The tabloids rant and compare the boys to Myra Hindley, Peter Sutcliffe and Fred West. But Lord Woolf rightly accepts that children who kill are entitled to a shorter period of punishment: "the overriding mitigating feature of the offence", he says, "is the age of the two boys when the crime was committed".

There are other reasons for his ruling, including the progress the boys have made in their secure units, the remorse they have shown (in Thompson's case this was conspicuously absent during the trial), and the limited risk of their reoffending. But at the heart of it is an acknowledgement, which the Sun and the former home secretary Michael Howard still feel unable to make, that to spend your whole adolescence in custody for something you did as a child is punishment enough. It is not as if the punishment will end on the day the boys are released. To come out after years inside is hard for any prisoner; for these two, who were only 10 when their confinement began and whose crime has made them infamous, it will be difficult in the extreme, whatever strategies to protect them are put in place.

Lord Woolf's ruling may have been vilified in some quarters, but it is indicative of a changed moral climate in Britain. In 1993, the Major era, the public mood was sour and vengeful. Cases of children killing children were extremely rare (and still are), but the rise in juvenile crime - shoplifting, petty theft, joy-riding and so on - led to calls for stiffer penalties against young offenders. Thompson and Venables were to be made an example of, pour découragerles autres. "We must understand a little less and condemn a little more," said John Major, who followed the trial closely. The political agenda was unmistakable. The Bulger killers came to symbolise a moral panic about the nation's children. Hadn't kids once been more innocent, less brutalised? Childhood itself was in the dock.

Seven years on, people look back and see the case differently - as one that reflects as much on adults as on children. Why did so many passers-by fail to intervene that fateful day, though they claimed to see a toddler being mistreated? Weren't Thompson and Venables the victims of trouble at school and home? Shouldn't they have been offered therapy of some kind in the months between their arrest and the trial? And how can we justify trying children in open court, with the world's press looking on? It wasn't popular to raise such questions in 1993; now it's less inflammatory to point out that we have responsibilities as a society - even towards children who kill.

If things have moved on, it is not because of politicians. Taking an enlightened view of the Bulger case has always been a potential vote-loser and MPs are still unwilling to stick their necks out. Simon Hughes for the Liberal Democrats was a lone voice defending Lord Woolf last week. Jack Straw, the Home Secretary, continues to look spineless. When he referred the case to Lord Woolf after the European Court ruling, rather than reverting to the 10-year sentence recommended by the previous Lord Chief Justice, many were surprised. Perhaps he hoped for an increased sentence, since he likes to be thought tough on juvenile crime. More plausibly, he was simply ducking the issue.

Whether judges are the right people to legislate in sensitive public cases is now being questioned, not least by Tory politicians, one of whom, Gerald Howarth, has spoken of "judges usurping the function of MPs". But part of the reason the Bulger case has dragged on so long is because a politician, Michael Howard, in the view of Strasbourg, usurped the function of the judiciary and in so doing violated the human rights of the accused. Judges can be unworldly but that's better than courting the world's applause. Their only interest should lie in seeing that the scales of justice are balanced. Politicians have other interests, primarily that of staying in office, and this makes them unreliable in matters of law. Mr Howard was well aware that doubling the sentence of Thompson and Venables would go down well with Middle England.

This case has seen so many appeals and counter-appeals, so many new rulings and revisions, there appeared to be no end in sight. Lord Woolf should be praised for bringing a conclusion nearer at last. Punishment and retribution have run their course. It is time for Thompson and Venables to be given the chance to atone.

 

Blake Morrison's study of the Bulger case, 'As If', is published by Granta.

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Guru Careers: Software Developer / C# Developer

£40-50K: Guru Careers: We are seeking an experienced Software / C# Developer w...

Guru Careers: Software Developer

£35 - 40k + Benefits: Guru Careers: We are seeking a Software Developer (JavaS...

SThree: Trainee Recruitment Consultant / Resourcer

£18000 - £23000 per annum + Commission: SThree: As a Trainee Recruitment Consu...

Ashdown Group: UI Developer - (UI, HTML, CSS, JavaScript, AngularJS)

£25000 - £40000 per annum: Ashdown Group: UI Developer - (UI, JavaScript, HTML...

Day In a Page

Read Next
Ed Balls has ruled out a return to politics - for now  

For Labour to now turn round and rubbish what it stood for damages politics even more

Ian Birrell
Sun, sex and an anthropological study: One British academic's summer of hell in Magaluf

Sun, sex and an anthropological study

One academic’s summer of hell in Magaluf
From Shakespeare to Rising Damp... to Vicious

Frances de la Tour's 50-year triumph

'Rising Damp' brought De la Tour such recognition that she could be forgiven if she'd never been able to move on. But at 70, she continues to flourish - and to beguile
'That Whitsun, I was late getting away...'

Ian McMillan on the Whitsun Weddings

This weekend is Whitsun, and while the festival may no longer resonate, Larkin's best-loved poem, lives on - along with the train journey at the heart of it
Kathryn Williams explores the works and influences of Sylvia Plath in a new light

Songs from the bell jar

Kathryn Williams explores the works and influences of Sylvia Plath
How one man's day in high heels showed him that Cannes must change its 'no flats' policy

One man's day in high heels

...showed him that Cannes must change its 'flats' policy
Is a quiet crusade to reform executive pay bearing fruit?

Is a quiet crusade to reform executive pay bearing fruit?

Dominic Rossi of Fidelity says his pressure on business to control rewards is working. But why aren’t other fund managers helping?
The King David Hotel gives precious work to Palestinians - unless peace talks are on

King David Hotel: Palestinians not included

The King David is special to Jerusalem. Nick Kochan checked in and discovered it has some special arrangements, too
More people moving from Australia to New Zealand than in the other direction for first time in 24 years

End of the Aussie brain drain

More people moving from Australia to New Zealand than in the other direction for first time in 24 years
Meditation is touted as a cure for mental instability but can it actually be bad for you?

Can meditation be bad for you?

Researching a mass murder, Dr Miguel Farias discovered that, far from bringing inner peace, meditation can leave devotees in pieces
Eurovision 2015: Australians will be cheering on their first-ever entrant this Saturday

Australia's first-ever Eurovision entrant

Australia, a nation of kitsch-worshippers, has always loved the Eurovision Song Contest. Maggie Alderson says it'll fit in fine
Letterman's final Late Show: Laughter, but no tears, as David takes his bow after 33 years

Laughter, but no tears, as Letterman takes his bow after 33 years

Veteran talkshow host steps down to plaudits from four presidents
Ivor Novello Awards 2015: Hozier wins with anti-Catholic song 'Take Me To Church' as John Whittingdale leads praise for Black Sabbath

Hozier's 'blasphemous' song takes Novello award

Singer joins Ed Sheeran and Clean Bandit in celebration of the best in British and Irish music
Tequila gold rush: The spirit has gone from a cheap shot to a multi-billion pound product

Join the tequila gold rush

The spirit has gone from a cheap shot to a multi-billion pound product
12 best statement wallpapers

12 best statement wallpapers

Make an impact and transform a room with a conversation-starting pattern
Paul Scholes column: Does David De Gea really want to leave Manchester United to fight it out for the No 1 spot at Real Madrid?

Paul Scholes column

Does David De Gea really want to leave Manchester United to fight it out for the No 1 spot at Real Madrid?