Abortion. Drugs. Gays. Transsexuals. We're not a progressive nation, are we?

Share

Here's one that David Blunkett does not need to agonise over. Yesterday the European Court of Human Rights, in Strasbourg, upheld Christine Goodwin's right to be a woman. The judges unanimously ruled that her country – Britain – had breached her right to privacy and her right to marry by refusing to accept that, though born a man, she was now a woman. Incidentally, the other three countries who are in the same boat as us are Ireland, Andorra and Albania.

You can just imagine, however, what would have happened had there been no Strasbourg court and had the Home Secretary proposed action himself. Various newspapers would have declared that this was "political correctness gone mad", phone-ins would have asked how such legislation could be a priority at a time when policemen are crumbling and there aren't enough hospitals on the street. Then the legislation would have been held up for a thousand years in the Lords while Baroness Young argued that it was bound to lead to thousands of impressionable young men getting carried away and becoming young women.

This is not a country to be bold in, as evidenced by the reaction to David Blunkett's decision, announced on Wednesday, to reclassify cannabis from a Class B (Bad) drug to a Class C (be Careful) one. Immediately Brixton was scoured for bobbies who thought it was a disaster, newspapers that – six months ago – thought reclassification was a neat idea suddenly got a fit of the vapours when confronted with real action, and the drugs tsar upped and resigned.

Changing the drugs laws is complex enough. Changing them in Britain is a labour of Hercules. Look at what Mr Blunkett feels forced to say. The journalists ask him, of cannabis: "Is it bad for you, and is it wrong?" To which Labour's own Hercules answers: "Yes and yes." But what he really means is: "A little bit and no, it isn't." How can it be "wrong" per se to smoke or eat cannabis? The missing question, though, was: "Is it pleasant?"

In the House, the admirable Conservative home affairs spokesman Oliver Letwin understands the logical flaw in Blunkett's public reasoning. Well, who doesn't? If you let people consume a product, but make the selling of the product illegal, you hand supply over to criminals. QED. Letwin's answer to this conundrum, however, is obscure. Does he choose vigorously to prosecute cannabis consumers, or does he take the opposite logical course and legalise the sale of spliffs? Um, no.

We have only got to this point because: (a) the police have, effectively, demanded it; and (b) cannabis-taking is pretty universal among the young in this country. It is, partly, the change in public opinion that emboldens a Home Secretary who is more than usually sensitive to shifts in the popular mood.

His incremental pace, however, is dictated by a determination not to do the right thing before enough people realise that it is the right thing.

Look back at the history of social reform in this country, and you can see that Blunkett's carefulness is typical. In 1861 the Offences Against the Person Act made it illegal "to procure a miscarriage" (ie carry out an abortion). The penalty was life imprisonment. It took another 75 years before the Abortion Law Reform Association (ALRA) was formed. In 1938, Dr Aleck Bourne, a gynaecologist, invited the police to prosecute him for performing an abortion on a 14-year-old rape victim. Bourne was acquitted on the grounds that he had acted to prevent the girl from becoming a "physical and mental wreck".

A year later, a government committee recommended changes to the abortion laws, but nothing was done. It wasn't until the thalidomide tragedy in the early 1960s that abortion became a matter of wide public controversy. When – at last – in 1967 a Bill liberalising the law passed though the Commons, it was a young Liberal MP who sponsored it – not the Health Secretary. It was a rough ride. And even then the new law did not apply to parts of the UK.

Gay law reform has taken even longer. After a series of scandals, largely caused by police overzealousness, the Wolfenden Committee was set up in 1954 to consider the laws on homosexuality. In 1957 the committee recommended liberalisation, and the first parliamentary debate on the subject was held in December that year. The then Home Secretary parked the Wolfenden recommendations, arguing that they wouldn't enjoy the support of the general public. More research, he said, was needed. That's the way it stayed for another 10 years, until the Sexual Offences Act was passed. Even this put the age of gay consent at 21 and made homosexuality a criminal offence if more than two people were present.

Some Labour ministers feared the public reaction. Richard Crossman, in his diary for 3 July 1967, wrote of the Bill: "It may well be 20 years ahead of public opinion; certainly working-class people in the north jeer at their Members at the weekend and ask them why they're looking after the buggers at Westminster instead of the unemployed at home."

Just last year, the Lords were refusing to accept an equalisation of the gay age of consent, and the right of gays to serve in the armed forces was only upheld by a judgment from the European Court of Human Rights. In all cases it was argued that liberalisation of the law was running ahead of public opinion.

The abolition of capital punishment was even more tortuous. In 1908 it was abolished for people under 16; in 1922 for maternal infanticide; in 1931 for pregnant women; in 1933 for the under-18s. In 1957, following the wrongful hanging of Timothy Evans, the ultimate penalty was restricted to murder in the course or furtherance of theft, murder by shooting or causing an explosion, murder while resisting arrest or during an escape, murder of a police officer or prison officer and for two murders committed on different occasions. So if you strangled two people at the same time, you were OK, as long as you weren't robbing them and they weren't police officers. Not until 1969 was the death penalty abolished for murder altogether.

In each case, necessary action awaited the creation not of a majority for change, but of a critical mass of law-makers, enforcers, professionals and a progressive section of society. And in each case the progression was uneven and met by hostility.

So, one day (round about the same time as Andorra) we will legalise marijuana and drugs such as ecstasy, regulate their quality by law and then launch education campaigns to persuade youngsters not to use them in school hours, drivers not to take them, and spliff-smokers to find a less harmful way of ingesting their jollies. Gradually, over time, we will cease the demonisation of pushers – not because they are a fine upstanding group of men and women, but because drugs are about demand pull not supply push. The problem with drugs is pullers, not pushers, and they need education, not punishment.

d.aaronovitch@independent.co.uk

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Service Delivery Manager - Software Company

£40000 - £50000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Service Delivery Manager Kingston Up...

Year 3 Teacher

£90 - £120 per day: Randstad Education Hull: Year 3 Primary Teacher in HullA f...

Drama Teacher - Hull and Grimsby

Negotiable: Randstad Education Hull: The JobRandstad are currently in need of ...

Reception Teacher

£90 - £120 per day: Randstad Education Hull: Randstad Education is the UK mark...

Day In a Page

Read Next
 

Daily catch-up: Ed Miliband on low pay; Alan Johnson on Betjeman; Tom Freeman on editing

John Rentoul
A roller-coaster tale from the 'voice of a generation'

Not That Kind of Girl:

A roller-coaster tale from 'voice of a generation' Lena Dunham
London is not bedlam or a cradle of vice. In fact it, as much as anywhere, deserves independence

London is not bedlam or a cradle of vice

In fact it, as much as anywhere, deserves independence
Vivienne Westwood 'didn’t want' relationship with Malcolm McLaren

Vivienne Westwood 'didn’t want' relationship with McLaren

Designer 'felt pressured' into going out with Sex Pistols manager
Jourdan Dunn: Model mother

Model mother

Jordan Dunn became one of the best-paid models in the world
Apple still coolest brand – despite U2 PR disaster

Apple still the coolest brand

Despite PR disaster of free U2 album
Scottish referendum: The Yes vote was the love that dared speak its name, but it was not to be

Despite the result, this is the end of the status quo

Boyd Tonkin on the fall-out from the Scottish referendum
Manolo Blahnik: The high priest of heels talks flats, Englishness, and why he loves Mary Beard

Manolo Blahnik: Flats, Englishness, and Mary Beard

The shoe designer who has been dubbed 'the patron saint of the stiletto'
The Beatles biographer reveals exclusive original manuscripts of some of the best pop songs ever written

Scrambled eggs and LSD

Behind The Beatles' lyrics - thanks to Hunter Davis's original manuscript copies
'Normcore' fashion: Blending in is the new standing out in latest catwalk non-trend

'Normcore': Blending in is the new standing out

Just when fashion was in grave danger of running out of trends, it only went and invented the non-trend. Rebecca Gonsalves investigates
Dance’s new leading ladies fight back: How female vocalists are now writing their own hits

New leading ladies of dance fight back

How female vocalists are now writing their own hits
Mystery of the Ground Zero wedding photo

A shot in the dark

Mystery of the wedding photo from Ground Zero
His life, the universe and everything

His life, the universe and everything

New biography sheds light on comic genius of Douglas Adams
Save us from small screen superheroes

Save us from small screen superheroes

Shows like Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D are little more than marketing tools
Reach for the skies

Reach for the skies

From pools to football pitches, rooftop living is looking up
These are the 12 best hotel spas in the UK

12 best hotel spas in the UK

Some hotels go all out on facilities; others stand out for the sheer quality of treatments