- Saturday 25 May 2013
- My Account
- Logout
- Register
- Login
- News
-
Voices
-
Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Terence Blacker
- Chris Blackhurst
- David Blanchflower
- Archie Bland
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Laura Davis
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Stefano Hatfield
- Philip Hensher
- Ian Herbert
- Howard Jacobson
- Ellen E Jones
- Alice Jones
- Owen Jones
- Simon Kelner
- Dominic Lawson
- Donald Macintyre
- Lisa Markwell
- Comment
- Campaigns
- Debate
- Editorials
- Letters
- IV Drip
- Archive
- Our Voices
- Commentators
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
-
Find by writer
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts & Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Blogs
- Student
It was the most-leaked Budget in recent memory as the Liberal Democrats negotiated in public and tried to claim ownership of their favoured measures. The unexpected burst of openness should have worked to George Osborne's advantage. His allies deployed the usual trick of trailing in advance announcements that would have got less coverage if they had been held back until Budget day. Nothing new there then.
But the Chancellor made a fatal mistake. The key measures leaked out – the cut in the top tax rate and increase in the tax-free personal allowance to £9,205. But one big one did not: his freeze on the age-related allowances for pensioners.
Unwittingly, Mr Osborne turned the Treasury's usual communications strategy on its head. Most Chancellors save a nice white rabbit to pull out of their hat with a flourish. Mr Osborne's good news for 24 million people had been well-trailed and the main item of "new news" – the so-called "granny tax" – was a dead rabbit. It came as a surprise and so received much more coverage than if it had formed part of the speculation.
Yesterday, Labour forced David Gauke, the Treasury minister, to make an emergency Commons statement on leaks. He appeared to rewrite the rule on pre-Budget purdah, insisting: "I am not aware of any minister briefing any market-sensitive information." But he was right to accuse Labour of "synthetic outrage". The man leading the Opposition attack was Chris Leslie, once an aide to Gordon Brown. That really is the pot calling the kettle black.
-
This week's big questions: How best to react to Woolwich? Has Miliband got what it takes? And is Stephen King right about ebooks?
Ian Rankin -
What, let gays get married? We must be bonkers
Mark Steel -
The Daily Cartoon
-
The dark side of Dubai
-
Woolwich attack: The EDL will seek to exploit this evil crime for their own evil ends
Jamie Lewis
Get your summer started with British Military Fitness
BMF is the UK’s biggest and best loved outdoor fitness classes
Visit York
Find out what The Independent's resident travel expert has to say about one of the most beautiful small cities in the world
Making reading fun for kids
Nook is donating eReaders to volunteers at high-need schools and participating in exclusive events throughout the campaign.
Introducing the 'Get Reading' campaign
Get the latest on The Evening Standard's campaign to get London's children reading.
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Andrew Grice
Related Articles
Get the best in opinion from Independent Voices, straight to your inbox every Thursday lunchtime.
Subscribe
Amol Rajan
A weekly update from the Editor
Day In a Page
Johnny Marr talks relationships and reunions
In pictures: After the flood
Death becomes her: A very modern mortician
School of chop: Learning the art of butchery
The man who's eaten everywhere
A Berliner in 1963 – but did John F Kennedy once admire Adolf Hitler?