Any peace deal in the Middle East must include extremists on both sides

The process must be rebuilt from the ground up rather than just proclaimed from summits'

Share

Having gambled with the peace process and almost lost it, Ehud Barak, Yasser Arafat and Bill Clinton meet today in Egypt to get it back on track. If they are to succeed, they will need to revive the contract at its heart: the Palestinian sense of injustice must be eased as the Israeli sense of insecurity is calmed.

Having gambled with the peace process and almost lost it, Ehud Barak, Yasser Arafat and Bill Clinton meet today in Egypt to get it back on track. If they are to succeed, they will need to revive the contract at its heart: the Palestinian sense of injustice must be eased as the Israeli sense of insecurity is calmed.

This process has never been about sentimental visions of a future world where Arab and Jew might walk together in friendship - which at the moment is just as well. Nor has it ever been the preferred approach for either side. The Palestinians would have preferred to regain their homeland on the backs of victorious Arab armies. But Israel was an established power and not to be dislodged. The Israelis would have preferred to hold on to West Bank and Gaza, the territories occupied during the 1967 war, on their own terms. But the Palestinian intifada of the late 1980s had made them aware of their inability to police the occupied territories.

So the deal forged at Oslo and backed by Clinton was that a Palestinian Authority would be granted progressive control over the occupied territories, culminating perhaps in the full transfer of sovereignty, so long as it kept the fanatics, mainly Hamas, in check. The process would be gradual, with an accumulation of mutual confidence at each stage to take the process on to the next.

Mutual confidence, however, remained in short supply. Arafat clamped down on local militants, but every terrorist attack meant that Israelis remained insecure. This led them to reduce the physical interaction between the two communities, and so the ability of the Palestinians to benefit from the strength of the Israeli economy.

By this summer, gradualism was becoming more difficult. Arafat was threatening to force the pace by declaring an independent Palestinian state in September. In Israel the Labour government, led by Ehud Barak, was prepared to rise to the challenge. He had cast himself as Rabin's worthy successor, a man who would reach the final settlements with the Lebanese, the Syrians and the Palestinians.

President Bill Clinton also saw merit in trying to move the whole process to closure and hosted an extended summit at Camp David in July. Unfortunately the agenda was too large and the preparation inadequate. Even so, it made remarkable progress. Barak offered substantial compromises on the sharing of sovereignty over Jerusalem, which led his more hawkish coalition partners to desert him. But Arafat could not accept a deal that, however realistic, required him to sign away many Palestinian dreams. A specific sticking point was Temple Mount, the Islamic holy site.

After this failure, the situation seemed difficult but not dire. Arafat held back on announcing a Palestinian state. But his frustration was not helped by the Americans blaming him for missing a historic opportunity, and not even putting in a counter-offer. He had lost the moral high ground. The Israelis now believe that Arafat decided that the only way he could take the issue further would be to create a crisis, to provide a display of Palestinian anger that would convince the Israelis that they dare not be too stubborn. It is the nature of Jewish-Palestinian relations that a pretext would be provided soon enough.

This was the background to the recent cycle of violence: Likud leader Ariel Sharon making his point about the sovereignty of Temple Mount in a knowingly provocative manner; the Israeli army responding to rioting with excessive firepower, creating a succession of martyrs; Palestinian passions running so high that any Israeli target of opportunity, be it a tomb, a rabbi or three hapless soldiers, attacked without inhibition; the bombing of Ramallah.

Arafat is now discredited in Israeli eyes as a partner in peace. Either he is in control of the Palestinian Territories, in which case he is culpable of fomenting an insurrection as a crude negotiating ploy, or else he is not, and so cannot deliver on any agreement reached. Barak is discredited in Palestinian eyes. He is blamed for their dead and now seems ready to harden rather than soften his line, an unavoidable consequence of bringing Sharon into a government of national emergency.

The harsh strategic realities behind this process have not changed. Any Israeli attempt to impose martial law throughout the occupied territories will fail. It cannot regain control of the streets through helicopter gunships, and the Israeli Defence Force simply lacks the manpower. It would risk the further spread of inter-communal violence into Israel, and the loss of what has already been achieved with Egypt and Jordan as well as with the Palestinians.

The readiness of young Palestinians to face superior firepower may have shocked Israelis, confident that a display of force can always control a crowd in uproar, but Arafat must also be aware that the excitement on the streets can soon give way again to a sense of despair with little to show for all the carnage. He can declare an independent state, and gain a degree of recognition, but without dialogue he cannot gain effective control or improve the condition of his people.

Both Barak and Arafat, weakened as they are, still understand these harsh realities. If they want to negotiate, imaginative ideas are being canvassed on the sticking points - for example putting Temple Mount under UN, or even divine, sovereignty. It is important not to forget how much has been agreed. But trust has been lost and the leaders are obliged to sound tough.

This creates a real danger for today's summit. It will be an achievement if it manages to persuade the Israelis to lift the current state of siege in return for a Palestinian promise of restraint. But Hamas may not be a party to any promise, and there are many opportunities for independent extremist action, including retaliatory terrorism. Within the West Bank, many of the Jewish settlements are barely defensible. Moreover, Clinton is a lame-duck president, who has been outplayed by Kofi Annan in the recent crisis management and brings remarkably little to the table.

If restraint takes hold, diplomacy cannot continue as if nothing has happened. Time is needed to digest the lessons of these terrible events. As an alternative to a prolonged and divisive Israeli general election, it may even be better if Sharon was brought back into government, even though this a man with few equals in the counter-productive use of armed force. The point is only that more sections of both communities need to be drawn into the peace process if it is to be rebuilt from the ground rather than just proclaimed from summits. At the moment it seems a ludicrous proposition, but the best deal would be one sealed by Sharon and embraced by Hamas.

The writer is professor of War Studies at King's College London

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Recruitment Genius: Online Media Sales Trainee

£15000 - £30000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Now our rapidly expanding and A...

Recruitment Genius: Public House Manager / Management Couples

£15000 - £20000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Are you passionate about great ...

Recruitment Genius: Production Planner

£20000 - £30000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This fast growing reinforcing s...

Recruitment Genius: General Factory Operatives

£18000 - £35000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This fast growing reinforcing s...

Day In a Page

Read Next
 

If I were Prime Minister: Every privatised corner of the NHS would be taken back into public ownership

Philip Pullman
 

Errors & Omissions: Magna Carta, sexing bishops and ministerial aides

John Rentoul
As in 1942, Germany must show restraint over Greece

As in 1942, Germany must show restraint over Greece

Mussolini tried to warn his ally of the danger of bringing the country to its knees. So should we, says Patrick Cockburn
Britain's widening poverty gap should be causing outrage at the start of the election campaign

The short stroll that should be our walk of shame

Courting the global elite has failed to benefit Britain, as the vast disparity in wealth on display in the capital shows
Homeless Veterans appeal: The rise of the working poor: when having a job cannot prevent poverty

Homeless Veterans appeal

The rise of the working poor: when having a job cannot prevent poverty
Prince Charles the saviour of the nation? A new book highlights concerns about how political he will be when he eventually becomes king

Prince Charles the saviour of the nation?

A new book highlights concerns about how political he will be when he eventually becomes king
How books can defeat Isis: Patrick Cockburn was able to update his agenda-setting 'The Rise of Islamic State' while under attack in Baghdad

How books can defeat Isis

Patrick Cockburn was able to update his agenda-setting 'The Rise of Islamic State' while under attack in Baghdad
Judith Hackitt: The myths of elf 'n' safety

Judith Hackitt: The myths of elf 'n' safety

She may be in charge of minimising our risks of injury, but the chair of the Health and Safety Executive still wants children to be able to hurt themselves
The open loathing between Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu just got worse

The open loathing between Obama and Netanyahu just got worse

The Israeli PM's relationship with the Obama has always been chilly, but going over the President's head on Iran will do him no favours, says Rupert Cornwell
French chefs get 'le huff' as nation slips down global cuisine rankings

French chefs get 'le huff' as nation slips down global cuisine rankings

Fury at British best restaurants survey sees French magazine produce a rival list
Star choreographer Matthew Bourne gives young carers a chance to perform at Sadler's Wells

Young carers to make dance debut

What happened when superstar choreographer Matthew Bourne encouraged 27 teenage carers to think about themselves for once?
Design Council's 70th anniversary: Four of the most intriguing prototypes from Ones to Watch

Design Council's 70th anniversary

Four of the most intriguing prototypes from Ones to Watch
Dame Harriet Walter: The actress on learning what it is to age, plastic surgery, and her unease at being honoured by the establishment

Dame Harriet Walter interview

The actress on learning what it is to age, plastic surgery, and her unease at being honoured by the establishment
Art should not be a slave to the ideas driving it

Art should not be a slave to the ideas driving it

Critics of Tom Stoppard's new play seem to agree that cerebral can never trump character, says DJ Taylor
Bill Granger recipes: Our chef's winter salads will make you feel energised through February

Bill Granger's winter salads

Salads aren't just a bit on the side, says our chef - their crunch, colour and natural goodness are perfect for a midwinter pick-me-up
England vs Wales: Cool head George Ford ready to put out dragon fire

George Ford: Cool head ready to put out dragon fire

No 10’s calmness under pressure will be key for England in Cardiff
Michael Calvin: Time for Old Firm to put aside bigotry and forge new links

Michael Calvin's Last Word

Time for Old Firm to put aside bigotry and forge new links