Any peace deal in the Middle East must include extremists on both sides

The process must be rebuilt from the ground up rather than just proclaimed from summits'

Share

Having gambled with the peace process and almost lost it, Ehud Barak, Yasser Arafat and Bill Clinton meet today in Egypt to get it back on track. If they are to succeed, they will need to revive the contract at its heart: the Palestinian sense of injustice must be eased as the Israeli sense of insecurity is calmed.

Having gambled with the peace process and almost lost it, Ehud Barak, Yasser Arafat and Bill Clinton meet today in Egypt to get it back on track. If they are to succeed, they will need to revive the contract at its heart: the Palestinian sense of injustice must be eased as the Israeli sense of insecurity is calmed.

This process has never been about sentimental visions of a future world where Arab and Jew might walk together in friendship - which at the moment is just as well. Nor has it ever been the preferred approach for either side. The Palestinians would have preferred to regain their homeland on the backs of victorious Arab armies. But Israel was an established power and not to be dislodged. The Israelis would have preferred to hold on to West Bank and Gaza, the territories occupied during the 1967 war, on their own terms. But the Palestinian intifada of the late 1980s had made them aware of their inability to police the occupied territories.

So the deal forged at Oslo and backed by Clinton was that a Palestinian Authority would be granted progressive control over the occupied territories, culminating perhaps in the full transfer of sovereignty, so long as it kept the fanatics, mainly Hamas, in check. The process would be gradual, with an accumulation of mutual confidence at each stage to take the process on to the next.

Mutual confidence, however, remained in short supply. Arafat clamped down on local militants, but every terrorist attack meant that Israelis remained insecure. This led them to reduce the physical interaction between the two communities, and so the ability of the Palestinians to benefit from the strength of the Israeli economy.

By this summer, gradualism was becoming more difficult. Arafat was threatening to force the pace by declaring an independent Palestinian state in September. In Israel the Labour government, led by Ehud Barak, was prepared to rise to the challenge. He had cast himself as Rabin's worthy successor, a man who would reach the final settlements with the Lebanese, the Syrians and the Palestinians.

President Bill Clinton also saw merit in trying to move the whole process to closure and hosted an extended summit at Camp David in July. Unfortunately the agenda was too large and the preparation inadequate. Even so, it made remarkable progress. Barak offered substantial compromises on the sharing of sovereignty over Jerusalem, which led his more hawkish coalition partners to desert him. But Arafat could not accept a deal that, however realistic, required him to sign away many Palestinian dreams. A specific sticking point was Temple Mount, the Islamic holy site.

After this failure, the situation seemed difficult but not dire. Arafat held back on announcing a Palestinian state. But his frustration was not helped by the Americans blaming him for missing a historic opportunity, and not even putting in a counter-offer. He had lost the moral high ground. The Israelis now believe that Arafat decided that the only way he could take the issue further would be to create a crisis, to provide a display of Palestinian anger that would convince the Israelis that they dare not be too stubborn. It is the nature of Jewish-Palestinian relations that a pretext would be provided soon enough.

This was the background to the recent cycle of violence: Likud leader Ariel Sharon making his point about the sovereignty of Temple Mount in a knowingly provocative manner; the Israeli army responding to rioting with excessive firepower, creating a succession of martyrs; Palestinian passions running so high that any Israeli target of opportunity, be it a tomb, a rabbi or three hapless soldiers, attacked without inhibition; the bombing of Ramallah.

Arafat is now discredited in Israeli eyes as a partner in peace. Either he is in control of the Palestinian Territories, in which case he is culpable of fomenting an insurrection as a crude negotiating ploy, or else he is not, and so cannot deliver on any agreement reached. Barak is discredited in Palestinian eyes. He is blamed for their dead and now seems ready to harden rather than soften his line, an unavoidable consequence of bringing Sharon into a government of national emergency.

The harsh strategic realities behind this process have not changed. Any Israeli attempt to impose martial law throughout the occupied territories will fail. It cannot regain control of the streets through helicopter gunships, and the Israeli Defence Force simply lacks the manpower. It would risk the further spread of inter-communal violence into Israel, and the loss of what has already been achieved with Egypt and Jordan as well as with the Palestinians.

The readiness of young Palestinians to face superior firepower may have shocked Israelis, confident that a display of force can always control a crowd in uproar, but Arafat must also be aware that the excitement on the streets can soon give way again to a sense of despair with little to show for all the carnage. He can declare an independent state, and gain a degree of recognition, but without dialogue he cannot gain effective control or improve the condition of his people.

Both Barak and Arafat, weakened as they are, still understand these harsh realities. If they want to negotiate, imaginative ideas are being canvassed on the sticking points - for example putting Temple Mount under UN, or even divine, sovereignty. It is important not to forget how much has been agreed. But trust has been lost and the leaders are obliged to sound tough.

This creates a real danger for today's summit. It will be an achievement if it manages to persuade the Israelis to lift the current state of siege in return for a Palestinian promise of restraint. But Hamas may not be a party to any promise, and there are many opportunities for independent extremist action, including retaliatory terrorism. Within the West Bank, many of the Jewish settlements are barely defensible. Moreover, Clinton is a lame-duck president, who has been outplayed by Kofi Annan in the recent crisis management and brings remarkably little to the table.

If restraint takes hold, diplomacy cannot continue as if nothing has happened. Time is needed to digest the lessons of these terrible events. As an alternative to a prolonged and divisive Israeli general election, it may even be better if Sharon was brought back into government, even though this a man with few equals in the counter-productive use of armed force. The point is only that more sections of both communities need to be drawn into the peace process if it is to be rebuilt from the ground rather than just proclaimed from summits. At the moment it seems a ludicrous proposition, but the best deal would be one sealed by Sharon and embraced by Hamas.

The writer is professor of War Studies at King's College London

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Recruitment Genius: Sales Administrator - Spanish Speaking

£17000 - £21000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is a fantastic opportunity...

Recruitment Genius: Sales Administrator - German Speaking

£17000 - £23000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is a fantastic opportunity...

Recruitment Genius: Sales Administrator - Japanese Speaking

£17000 - £23000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: If you are fluent in Japanese a...

Recruitment Genius: Graphic Designer - Immediate Start

£16000 - £25000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is a fantastic opportunity...

Day In a Page

Read Next
Dom Joly owns a pig. That thinks it's a dog.  

I'll bow out. Let Wilbur, the pig that thinks it's a dog, bring home the bacon

Dom Joly
 

Forget charging by the page - with books, heart matters more than heft

Katy Guest
The Greek referendum exposes a gaping hole at the heart of the European Union – its distinct lack of any genuine popular legitimacy

Gaping hole at the heart of the European Union

Treatment of Greece has shown up a lack of genuine legitimacy
Number of young homeless in Britain 'more than three times the official figures'

'Everything changed when I went to the hostel'

Number of young homeless people in Britain is 'more than three times the official figures'
Compton Cricket Club

Compton Cricket Club

Portraits of LA cricketers from notorious suburb to be displayed in London
London now the global money-laundering centre for the drug trade, says crime expert

Wlecome to London, drug money-laundering centre for the world

'Mexico is its heart and London is its head'
The Buddhist temple minutes from Centre Court that helps a winner keep on winning

The Buddhist temple minutes from Centre Court

It helps a winner keep on winning
Is this the future of flying: battery-powered planes made of plastic, and without flight decks?

Is this the future of flying?

Battery-powered planes made of plastic, and without flight decks
Isis are barbarians – but the Caliphate is a dream at the heart of all Muslim traditions

Isis are barbarians

but the Caliphate is an ancient Muslim ideal
The Brink's-Mat curse strikes again: three tons of stolen gold that brought only grief

Curse of Brink's Mat strikes again

Death of John 'Goldfinger' Palmer the latest killing related to 1983 heist
Greece debt crisis: 'The ministers talk to us about miracles' – why Greeks are cynical ahead of the bailout referendum

'The ministers talk to us about miracles'

Why Greeks are cynical ahead of the bailout referendum
Call of the wild: How science is learning to decode the way animals communicate

Call of the wild

How science is learning to decode the way animals communicate
Greece debt crisis: What happened to democracy when it’s a case of 'Vote Yes or else'?

'The economic collapse has happened. What is at risk now is democracy...'

If it doesn’t work in Europe, how is it supposed to work in India or the Middle East, asks Robert Fisk
The science of swearing: What lies behind the use of four-letter words?

The science of swearing

What lies behind the use of four-letter words?
The Real Stories of Migrant Britain: Clive fled from Zimbabwe - now it won't have him back

The Real Stories of Migrant Britain

Clive fled from Zimbabwe - now it won’t have him back
Africa on the menu: Three foodie friends want to popularise dishes from the continent

Africa on the menu

Three foodie friends want to popularise dishes from the hot new continent
Donna Karan is stepping down after 30 years - so who will fill the DKNY creator's boots?

Who will fill Donna Karan's boots?

The designer is stepping down as Chief Designer of DKNY after 30 years. Alexander Fury looks back at the career of 'America's Chanel'