Dominic Lawson: Private companies' pay is up to them

Unless what top directors receive is gargantuan, it will not be more than a tiny percentage of the company's income

Share

The front-page headline in yesterday's Independent was definitive – "Cable: I'll force fat cats to justify bonuses." The Guardian's splash was equally conclusive, though it took a slightly different angle – "Cable: workers will have a say on bosses' pay."

Well, it is usual with ministerial speeches at party conferences for newspapers to be spun the key statements in advance, and in a way judged to hit the soft spot of the readers. Given that purchasers of The Independent and The Guardian are assumed to be particularly offended by "excessive pay", this was for them.

As is also usual, however, the spin is more vigorous than the content. What the Business Secretary, Vince Cable, has actually done is to publish, in the words of his department, "A discussion paper [which] looks at the issues surrounding executive compensation. It puts forward wide-ranging proposals on how to link executive payment more closely to company performance and invites feedback and further evidence that will help build a stronger understanding of the issues." Hold the back page!

This document makes absolutely no definitive policy suggestions. It discusses such remedies as giving shareholders a veto on executive remuneration packages, or appointing a member of the workforce to boards' remuneration committees – but is studiously non-committal, offering arguments both for and against such proposals.

Admittedly, the foreword by Cable has a bit of political muscle: "Generous rewards are justified where a company has shown strong long-term performance. However, over the past 10 years the link between median CEO pay and performance of the FTSE 100 has been hard to discern. Although concerns about executive pay are not new, the recent financial crisis has made shareholders, the public and Government more acutely aware of the issue."

I'll say. And he's right that this is not new. In my cuttings book there is a foxed copy of a 1989 article I wrote for The Spectator entitled "How the Bosses Help Themselves". It began: "The nation's salaried employees share a common fear: how can they avoid a drop in their standard of living? For many of them the answer, increasingly, is industrial action: a hazardous and often self-defeating response. For a select group of employees, though, the last few years have yielded pay rises which have protected them ... They are Britain's company directors."

The methods identified in that article are the same as today's: remuneration committees whose non-executive members have a personal vested interest in boosting the pay of chief executives generally; and the hiring of remuneration "consultants" who themselves have an interest in coming up with proposals that will gratify the board that has appointed them.

Cable, rightly, identifies shareholders rather than the Government as the proper agent for invigilating such abuses. It is none of the business of politicians to instruct privately owned firms as to what they pay their employees – at all levels. Government pay policies, as this country discovered during the 1970s, are a disaster, however politically appealing they might seem in the short term.

Shareholders in large publicly quoted companies, however, while concerned about the businesses' wage bill as a whole, are not that exercised about what a handful of top directors get. Unless the figure is truly gargantuan, it will not amount to more than a tiny percentage of the income of the company. As I wrote 22 years ago: "If a company earning £1bn a year increases board pay from £3m to £6m, the shareholders will not feel a thing. The same principle ensures that grand-scale embezzlement can be concealed for long only in grand-scale companies".

For an up-to-the-minute illustration of this, we need only observe that Kweku Adoboli, the so-called rogue trader at the Swiss banking behemoth UBS, managed, it is alleged, to blow £1.5bn by unauthorised trading undetected for fully three years.

In this particular case, the losses will be absorbed in appropriate fashion. UBS says that none of its account-holders will be affected and that the losses will be borne by shareholders and by Mr Adoboli's 65,000 colleagues, who may well not see any bonuses at all this year. Similarly, if a company, by overpaying an ineffective chief executive – or "rewarding failure", as Dr Cable predictably puts it – does less well than other rival businesses, then its shareholders, and not the public as a whole, are the losers. Ditto if the company goes bankrupt and its assets are reallocated among better-managed firms.

However, Dr Cable's reference to the "financial crisis" touches on the most critical point, economically and politically. What if the company is not allowed to go bankrupt? What if it is a big bank, whose disappearance is judged to risk a collapse of the financial system as a whole? If the normal free-market arguments do not apply, then neither does the principle that overpayment, however ugly, is a purely private concern. If the taxpayer is effectively guaranteeing the business, then the taxpayer (represented by the politicians) has a right to interfere.

This lies behind the Government's commissioning of the Independent Banking Commission, which last week recommended that "universal" banks should not be allowed to funnel cash from their high-street wings to their higher-risk trading businesses. Since it is only the retail banking operations that the state wants to guarantee, this is a way of telling the banks that they will no longer be able to use ordinary depositors' money as the backing for their hedge-fund type businesses, which means that the taxpayer will no longer be underwriting the risks – and salaries-– of their colossally remunerated trading teams.

Whether this will be sufficient to ensure a necessary degree of prudence on the part of the banks is far from clear. It might make them less gung-ho, which would no bad thing; but I doubt that will have a direct effect on pay levels within their businesses. They will continue to be able to rely on the shareholders to support a business model in which at least half the profits go to employees – or at least until a big bank decides to offer its traders much less and pay higher dividends instead. I've never quite understood why such firms can't find lots of bright number-crunchers from India or China to make this happen – and perhaps one day they will.

Dr Cable could always suggest the repeal of the Banking Co-Partnership Act of 1826, which allowed independent banks throughout the UK to become joint-stock companies – that is, to be funded by outside shareholders rather than just their own partners. I'm sure that if bankers were once again subject to unlimited personal liability, they would be much more cautious about what they paid themselves.

On the other hand, they would also be much more cautious in their lending; and if there's one thing that the public seem to hate more than overpaid bankers, it's bankers who say no to demands for credit. So it's back to the drawing board, Dr Cable.





d.lawson@independent.co.uk

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Recruitment Genius: Senior Software Engineer - Python / Node / C / Go

£35000 - £45000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: *Flexible working in a relaxed ...

Recruitment Genius: Senior Bookkeeper

£20000 - £25000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This accountancy firm have an e...

Recruitment Genius: Junior Developer / Mobile Apps / Java / C# / HTML 5 / JS

£17000 - £28000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Junior Mobile Application Devel...

Recruitment Genius: LGV Driver - Category C or C+E

£23000 - £26000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This national Company that manu...

Day In a Page

Read Next
Newspaper stands have been criticised by the Child Eyes campaign  

There were more reader complaints this year – but, then again, there were more readers

Will Gore
 

People drink to shut out pain and stress – arresting them won’t help

Deborah Coughlin
A timely reminder of the bloody anniversary we all forgot

A timely reminder of the bloody anniversary we all forgot

Who remembers that this week we enter the 150th anniversary year of the end of the American Civil War, asks Robert Fisk
Homeless Veterans appeal: Former soldiers pay their respects to a friend who also served

Homeless Veterans appeal

Former soldiers pay their respects to a friend who also served
Downfall of Dustin 'Screech' Diamond, the 'Saved By The Bell' star charged with bar stabbing

Scarred by the bell

The downfall of the TV star charged with bar stabbing
Why 2014 was a year of technological let-downs

Why 2014 was a year of technological let-downs

Security breaches and overhyped start-ups dominated a year in which very little changed (save the size of your phone)
Cuba's golf revolution: But will the revolutionary nation take 'bourgeois' game to its heart?

Will revolutionary Cuba take 'bourgeois' golf to its heart?

Fidel Castro ridiculed the game – but now investment in leisure resort projects is welcome
The Locked Room Mysteries: As a new collection of the genre’s best is published, its editor Otto Penzler explains the rules of engagement

The Locked Room Mysteries

As a new collection of the genre’s best is published, its editor explains the rules of engagement
Amy Adams on playing painter Margaret Keane in Tim Burton's Big Eyes

How I made myself Keane

Amy Adams hadn’t wanted to take the role of artist Margaret Keane, because she’d had enough of playing victims. But then she had a daughter, and saw the painter in a new light
Ed Richards: Parting view of Ofcom chief. . . we hate jokes on the disabled

Parting view of Ofcom chief... we hate jokes on the disabled

Bad language once got TV viewers irate, inciting calls to broadcasting switchboards. But now there is a worse offender, says retiring head of the media watchdog, Ed Richards
A look back at fashion in 2014: Wear in review

Wear in review

A look back at fashion in 2014
Ian Herbert: My 10 hopes for sport in 2015. Might just one of them happen?

Ian Herbert: My 10 hopes for sport in 2015

Might just one of them happen?
War with Isis: The West needs more than a White Knight

The West needs more than a White Knight

Despite billions spent on weapons, the US has not been able to counter Isis's gruesome tactics, says Patrick Cockburn
Return to Helmand: Private Davey Graham recalls the day he was shot by the Taliban

'The day I was shot by the Taliban'

Private Davey Graham was shot five times during an ambush in 2007 - it was the first, controversial photograph to show the dangers our soldiers faced in Helmand province
Revealed: the best and worst airlines for delays

Revealed: the best and worst airlines for delays

Many flyers are failing to claim compensation to which they are entitled, a new survey has found
The stories that defined 2014: From the Scottish independence referendum to the Ice Bucket Challenge, our writers voice their opinions

The stories that defined 2014

From the Scottish independence referendum to the Ice Bucket Challenge, our writers voice their opinions
Stoke-on-Trent becomes first British city to be classified as 'disaster resilient' by the United Nations

Disaster looming? Now you know where to head...

Which British city has become the first to be awarded special 'resilience' status by the UN?