Hold fire on setting up this European military force

This new force could undermine the drive for a more human-rights friendly world

Share

Nothing is quite so ruinous to political reputations, not to mention human lives, as a misconceived military escapade. With the Government embroiled in controversy over the creation of a European rapid deployment force, it is time to embrace caution. Strange, you might think, for a self-professed apostle of humanitarian intervention to sound alarm bells about a force that is designed to give the world's dictators pause for thought. But I am worried by the prospect of a new force, precisely because I believe it could undermine the drive for a more human rights-friendly world.

Nothing is quite so ruinous to political reputations, not to mention human lives, as a misconceived military escapade. With the Government embroiled in controversy over the creation of a European rapid deployment force, it is time to embrace caution. Strange, you might think, for a self-professed apostle of humanitarian intervention to sound alarm bells about a force that is designed to give the world's dictators pause for thought. But I am worried by the prospect of a new force, precisely because I believe it could undermine the drive for a more human rights-friendly world.

The impetus for the new Euro rapid deployment force has been driven ostensibly by the impotence felt by European leaders during the collapse of the former Yugoslavia, not least the embarrassing fiasco of Kosovo when the US steadfastly refused to commit troops for an invasion of the province. With the almost certain arrival of George W Bush (the most internationally ignorant US president in recent history) in the White House, the argument for a European rapid deployment force seems unanswerable. What are we to do the next time some petty monster decides to butcher women and children?

I suspect that in the case of our own Government the commitment to the rapid deployment force is motivated by broadly humanitarian considerations, but the French purpose is notably less altruistic. It is not, as some commentators have argued, a narrow case of France undermining Nato in order to indulge her old anti-American passions. Rather it is about re-inventing France. A European rapid reaction force with French troops at its cutting edge would satisfy the French ambition to be a serious world power once more, an objective that is impossible to achieve while Europe is so dependent on US military power.

Of course it is not a bad idea to reduce our dependence on American power. I am writing as someone who watched genocide unfold in Rwanda while the US military argued over rental terms with UN troops who were trying to save African lives. Regular readers will know that I lay the major blame for the abandonment of a million people to massacre in Central Africa on the Clinton White House. The fact that Britain supported the US stance in the Security Council is a disgrace which has never been properly acknowledged.

But I am also aware that the French military and foreign service behaved shamefully in Rwanda, training and arming a murderous army, because they placed the foreign policy interests of France above those of humanity. They weren't the first power to behave this way in post-colonial Africa but few have had such a dreadful influence on events. A few years before Rwanda I was on the streets of Kinshasa when French and Belgian paratroopers arrived, ostensibly to protect the Europeans living there, in reality to prolong the rule of President Mobutu whose unpaid army had risen against him. The intervention prolonged the corrupt and despotic rule of Mobutu.

Even now, France retains a deep mistrust of British and US ambitions in Central Africa, believing that Anglo-Saxon influence poses a mortal threat to the continuation of a French cultural/linguistic tradition in the countries of the Great Lakes and further afield in the former French colonies of West Africa. The coming to power in post-genocide Rwanda of the largely English-speaking Rwandan Patriotic Front has enhanced the sense of threat felt by the French.

Given that Africa promises to confront us with recurring demands for humanitarian intervention, there must be huge doubts about the capacity of the British and French to agree on a common policy.

The major powers will continue to be guided by a specific view of where their national interests lies. There are times when this will coalesce into a common front, for ethical or strategic reasons, but there will be plenty of occasions when it will not.

The British will feel it necessary to intervene in Sierra Leone and will do so whether or not the French like it. It is hard to imagine the French resisting the temptation to intervene in Francophone Africa if the Quai d'Orsay believes the interests of France are at stake.

There is still no commonality of interest in foreign policy among the member states of the EU. And to project military power effectively you at least need to achieve political consensus about what your are planning. A Europe divided over the military and political objectives of intervention cannot possibly enter the moral quagmire of war. Consider what happens to individual nations who embark on muddled military adventures: the Franco-British experience at Suez, the Americans in Vietnam.

What is this force for and where will it fight? Take a quick tour of the world's trouble spots and try to answer that question. The Middle East? Forget it, the Americans and Israelis would never allow it. The Balkans? Possibly, the fires are still smouldering and there are battles of territorial redemption still to be fought. Africa? Possibly, but as I've already outlined, too much of the continent is still divided into colonial spheres of influence.

Whether it is in Africa or in the Eastern Mediterranean there are endless possibilities for dispute between European states over questions of national interest or tribal allegiance (Italy and Greece versus the rest in the Balkans, to name one).

We are conveniently ignoring the fact that European blundering and division were central factors in the escalation of the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia. Let us imagine that a European rapid reaction force had been available in 1990 when the conflict erupted in Croatia. Would Britain and France have taken the crucial step of despatching their forces against the Yugoslav national army after German policy-makers had pushed them to recognise the new Croatian state? They would not, for the same reasons that kept them from intervening when the ethnic cleansers swept through Bosnia two years later.

When you send men into modern battle you must expect substantial casualties and I am not remotely persuaded that the leaders of the European Union would be willing to take that degree of risk. Up to now the Americans have provided a useful scapegoat: "We can't intervene if they won't support us." Lest this be construed as an anti-French rant, let me set the question of motives aside and at least give Paris credit for being willing to deploy troops when nobody else will.

But if you despair when the US retreats into isolationism and refuses to help the victims of the world's small tyrannies, what are the options? The answer lies in getting the politics right before we even dream of setting up military forces. Establish first a set of principles for intervention and bind the member states to action irrespective of their national or tribal interests. The UN Convention on Genocide offers a model, although it has been sadly ignored in practice. There cannot be any opt-out clauses. After that, get your military men to prescibe the kind of force that will work and the resources they will need. This will take a long time. Longer than modern politicians are inclined to like. But it might save reputations and, of course, human lives.

 

The writer is a BBC Special Correspondent

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

General Cover Teacher

£120 - £125 per day: Randstad Education Luton: The Job:TEACHERS REQUIREDWe are...

Year 6 Teacher

£100 - £120 per day: Randstad Education Hull: Randstad Education are currently...

SEN Teaching Assistant

£60 - £70 per day: Randstad Education Leeds: Special Needs Teaching Assistant ...

Year 4 Teacher

Negotiable: Randstad Education Hull: Randstad Education is urgently recruiting...

Day In a Page

Read Next
 

Daily catch-up: Hislop the Younger, by-election polling and all about the olden days

John Rentoul
The bustling Accident & Emergency ward at Milton Keynes Hospital  

The NHS needs the courage to 'adapt and survive'

Nigel Edwards
How could three tourists have been battered within an inch of their lives by a burglar in a plush London hotel?

A crime that reveals London's dark heart

How could three tourists have been battered within an inch of their lives by a burglar in a plush London hotel?
Meet 'Porridge' and 'Vampire': Chinese state TV is offering advice for citizens picking a Western moniker

Lost in translation: Western monikers

Chinese state TV is offering advice for citizens picking a Western moniker. Simon Usborne, who met a 'Porridge' and a 'Vampire' while in China, can see the problem
Handy hacks that make life easier: New book reveals how to rid your inbox of spam, protect your passwords and amplify your iPhone

Handy hacks that make life easier

New book reveals how to rid your email inbox of spam, protect your passwords and amplify your iPhone with a loo-roll
KidZania lets children try their hands at being a firefighter, doctor or factory worker for the day

KidZania: It's a small world

The new 'educational entertainment experience' in London's Shepherd's Bush will allow children to try out the jobs that are usually undertaken by adults, including firefighter, doctor or factory worker
Renée Zellweger's real crime has been to age in an industry that prizes women's youth over humanity

'Renée Zellweger's real crime was to age'

The actress's altered appearance raised eyebrows at Elle's Women in Hollywood awards on Monday
From Cinderella to The Jungle Book, Disney plans live-action remakes of animated classics

Disney plans live-action remakes of animated classics

From Cinderella to The Jungle Book, Patrick Grafton-Green wonders if they can ever recapture the old magic
Thousands of teenagers to visit battlefields of the First World War in new Government scheme

Pupils to visit First World War battlefields

A new Government scheme aims to bring the the horrors of the conflict to life over the next five years
The 10 best smartphone accessories

Make the most of your mobile: 10 best smartphone accessories

Try these add-ons for everything from secret charging to making sure you never lose your keys again
Mario Balotelli substituted at half-time against Real Madrid: Was this shirt swapping the real reason?

Liverpool v Real Madrid

Mario Balotelli substituted at half-time. Was shirt swapping the real reason?
West Indies tour of India: Hurricane set to sweep Windies into the shadows

Hurricane set to sweep Windies into the shadows

Decision to pull out of India tour leaves the WICB fighting for its existence with an off-field storm building
Indiana serial killer? Man arrested for murdering teenage prostitute confesses to six other murders - and police fear there could be many more

A new American serial killer?

Police fear man arrested for murder of teen prostitute could be responsible for killing spree dating back 20 years
Sweetie, the fake 10-year-old girl designed to catch online predators, claims her first scalp

Sting to trap paedophiles may not carry weight in UK courts

Computer image of ‘Sweetie’ represented entrapment, experts say
Fukushima nuclear crisis: Evacuees still stuck in cramped emergency housing three years on - and may never return home

Return to Fukushima – a land they will never call home again

Evacuees still stuck in cramped emergency housing three years on from nuclear disaster
Wildlife Photographer of the Year: Intimate image of resting lions claims top prize

Wildlife Photographer of the Year

Intimate image of resting lions claims top prize
Online petitions: Sign here to change the world

Want to change the world? Just sign here

The proliferation of online petitions allows us to register our protests at the touch of a button. But do they change anything?