If Labour is defeated, it will not be Blair who is punished but the poorest and weakest

On 5 May, you can wipe the smile off the Prime Minister's face - but only by giving Michael Howard a big grin

Share

Election fever? Hardly. As we finally slump our way into the official general election campaign today, most of us can feel a bout of election gastoenteritis coming on. For the next month, we will experience a low, grumbling pain in the national gut as Michael Howard barks about Gypsies and Tony Blair offers us the insultingly brain-dead option of going "forward, not back".

Election fever? Hardly. As we finally slump our way into the official general election campaign today, most of us can feel a bout of election gastoenteritis coming on. For the next month, we will experience a low, grumbling pain in the national gut as Michael Howard barks about Gypsies and Tony Blair offers us the insultingly brain-dead option of going "forward, not back".

Every speech you hear will have been boiled for hours to rob it of any ideological flavour, and every sound-bite will have been slowly pasteurised - so it's easy to shrug and assume it's all meaningless. Howard or Blair, Pepsi or Coke, Tweedledum or Tweedledumber?

On the long, long road to 5 May, whenever I feel this mood descending on me I intend to drag out two pieces of paper. They are my electoral Lucozade, to be sipped whenever the worst political pains come on.

The first is this week's MORI poll of people who say they are certain to vote, the hardcore of the British electorate. Their verdict? Some 39 per cent will vote Tory - a full five points ahead of the Labour Party. These are the people who will decide who gets to govern us for five years if - and only if - enough of us shrug and walk away from the political process. The Tories know it. For the next month, they will try to drive down turnout with relentless negative campaigning, in the hope that an apathetic electorate will sleepwalk towards Conservatism.

And the second piece of paper? It's my list of Real Differences between the parties.

Yes, the margin between Labour and Tory is depressingly narrow right now. Whatever happens on 5 May we will wake up with a Prime Minister who sells arms to tyrants, refuses to tax the super-rich seriously, fails to deal properly with catastrophic climate change, backs the market fundamentalism of the World Bank and IMF, and worse. (And, yes, although it wasn't my particular sticking-point with New Labour, he will also have supported the invasion of Iraq.) That's why we need to work in the long term to change our political system radically to ensure we have much better choices.

But, for this month, we are stuck with what we have. The gap between Blair and Howard is narrow, but it is still the gap between life being bearable or not for a lot of people. It would be an insult to them to ignore this fact and let the Tories in by voting for third parties who cannot win. (The Liberal Democrats don't necessarily fall into this category - go to www.theyworkforyou.com to find out which party is the strongest anti-Tory force in your constituency).

The first item on my tattered list of Labour/Tory differences is tax and spending. Although Tony Blair is loathe to admit it in public, he leads a government that believes in a considerably bigger state and real redistribution of wealth. Just listen to what the American right says. Rana Foroohar of Newsweek recently wrote, "Guess which European government has expanded the public sector at a rate unheard of since the 1970s? It has added 50,000 government jobs, boosted overall public spending by 63 per cent [and], needless to say, the tax burden has increased (albeit by stealth). Statist France? No. Sclerotic Germany? No. The big spenders run a country that was once a model for 'third way' reform - Tony Blair's Britain."

In an article headed "Old Labour", the Wall Street Journal howls that our government is "a big spender and a big tax collector... on a journey to the European social democratic model". This is true - but it doesn't ring true. Why? All progress under New Labour has been done by stealth, so most of us simply don't know about it. There has been a 57 per cent increase in spending on social security, for example, to pay for tax credits - which are a polite way of Robin Hooding money from the comfortable upper-middle class and giving it to the struggling working classes. As a direct result, the poorest fifth of families are now £2,400 a year better off than in 1997. It might not sound a lot to middle-class readers - but to struggling working class people like some of my relatives, it's the difference between a decent life and constant, gnawing stress. How could I possibly go to them and say there's no difference between the parties, when they can feel the difference in their wallets every day?

Tax credits for the poor are not the only improvement this huge increase in tax-and-spend has paid for. Deep breath, here goes: The number of people sleeping rough on our streets has been cut by an incredible two-thirds - just ask Shelter. By 2007 - for the first time ever - we will be spending more on healthcare in this country than Sweden (a fact Newsweek attributes to "sentimental socialism"). The NHS - free at the point of use - is working again, with private hospitals going bust for the first time in decades. The government's "baby bonds" - private accounts set up for all new-born babies with a fresh £500 already there - will mean that, in 18 years time, it's not just the rich who receive a fat nest-egg on their eighteenth birthday.

And it gets better. You won't hear this point made by any Labour spokesman, but the money for all this has been raised - in significant part - through taxes on the wealthier chunk of the middle class. The government's "raid" on private pension funds took £5bn from the people wealthy enough to pay for lavish company pensions. The government has been whacking up taxes on middle-class inheritances too. The Halifax Bank recently discovered that government takings in inheritance tax on houses worth more than a quarter of a million pounds have increased by 400 per cent.

Michael Howard calls this a scandal; I think it's a delight, especially when you consider what the cash is paying for. With that cash, the government has built a huge network of SureStart centres for poor kids. They are one-stop shops for education, play and benefit advice, designed to make sure they don't fall behind middle-class kids before they even walk through the school gates. The research shows that the best time to reduce inequality is in infancy: by the age of three most middle-class children are already ahead in language skills - and the poor kids almost never catch up. The government is taking the unearned inheritances of the plump middle class to wipe out the lousy social inheritance of the poor. Everyone who says there isn't a cigarette paper between Labour and the Tories should be forced to spend a week in a SureStart centre. It's some cigarette paper.

Could you go to the beneficiaries of these policies and say you don't care if Michael Howard dismantles them? That's what you will be saying if you don't turn out, or if you offer an empty protest vote and let a Tory in.

As Ken Livingstone, nobody's idea of a Blairite stooge, put it last week: "If we experience a disastrous result on election night, it will not be Tony Blair who is punished. It will be the poorest and most vulnerable in our society." Sure, on 5 May you can wipe the smile off Tony Blair's face - but only by giving Michael Howard a big grin. As ever, in the real world, there is no third way.

j.hari@independent.co.uk

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Guru Careers: Software Developer / C# Developer

£40-50K: Guru Careers: We are seeking an experienced Software / C# Developer w...

Guru Careers: Software Developer

£35 - 40k + Benefits: Guru Careers: We are seeking a Software Developer (JavaS...

SThree: Trainee Recruitment Consultant / Resourcer

£18000 - £23000 per annum + Commission: SThree: As a Trainee Recruitment Consu...

Ashdown Group: UI Developer - (UI, HTML, CSS, JavaScript, AngularJS)

£25000 - £40000 per annum: Ashdown Group: UI Developer - (UI, JavaScript, HTML...

Day In a Page

Read Next
 

Errors & Omissions: the paraphernalia of a practised burglar – screwdrivers, gloves, children

Guy Keleny
The PM proposed 'commonsense restrictions' on migrant benefits  

So who, really, is David Cameron, our re-elected ‘one nation’ Prime Minister?

Andrew Grice
Sun, sex and an anthropological study: One British academic's summer of hell in Magaluf

Sun, sex and an anthropological study

One academic’s summer of hell in Magaluf
From Shakespeare to Rising Damp... to Vicious

Frances de la Tour's 50-year triumph

'Rising Damp' brought De la Tour such recognition that she could be forgiven if she'd never been able to move on. But at 70, she continues to flourish - and to beguile
'That Whitsun, I was late getting away...'

Ian McMillan on the Whitsun Weddings

This weekend is Whitsun, and while the festival may no longer resonate, Larkin's best-loved poem, lives on - along with the train journey at the heart of it
Kathryn Williams explores the works and influences of Sylvia Plath in a new light

Songs from the bell jar

Kathryn Williams explores the works and influences of Sylvia Plath
How one man's day in high heels showed him that Cannes must change its 'no flats' policy

One man's day in high heels

...showed him that Cannes must change its 'flats' policy
Is a quiet crusade to reform executive pay bearing fruit?

Is a quiet crusade to reform executive pay bearing fruit?

Dominic Rossi of Fidelity says his pressure on business to control rewards is working. But why aren’t other fund managers helping?
The King David Hotel gives precious work to Palestinians - unless peace talks are on

King David Hotel: Palestinians not included

The King David is special to Jerusalem. Nick Kochan checked in and discovered it has some special arrangements, too
More people moving from Australia to New Zealand than in the other direction for first time in 24 years

End of the Aussie brain drain

More people moving from Australia to New Zealand than in the other direction for first time in 24 years
Meditation is touted as a cure for mental instability but can it actually be bad for you?

Can meditation be bad for you?

Researching a mass murder, Dr Miguel Farias discovered that, far from bringing inner peace, meditation can leave devotees in pieces
Eurovision 2015: Australians will be cheering on their first-ever entrant this Saturday

Australia's first-ever Eurovision entrant

Australia, a nation of kitsch-worshippers, has always loved the Eurovision Song Contest. Maggie Alderson says it'll fit in fine
Letterman's final Late Show: Laughter, but no tears, as David takes his bow after 33 years

Laughter, but no tears, as Letterman takes his bow after 33 years

Veteran talkshow host steps down to plaudits from four presidents
Ivor Novello Awards 2015: Hozier wins with anti-Catholic song 'Take Me To Church' as John Whittingdale leads praise for Black Sabbath

Hozier's 'blasphemous' song takes Novello award

Singer joins Ed Sheeran and Clean Bandit in celebration of the best in British and Irish music
Tequila gold rush: The spirit has gone from a cheap shot to a multi-billion pound product

Join the tequila gold rush

The spirit has gone from a cheap shot to a multi-billion pound product
12 best statement wallpapers

12 best statement wallpapers

Make an impact and transform a room with a conversation-starting pattern
Paul Scholes column: Does David De Gea really want to leave Manchester United to fight it out for the No 1 spot at Real Madrid?

Paul Scholes column

Does David De Gea really want to leave Manchester United to fight it out for the No 1 spot at Real Madrid?