Martin Rees: Science could change our world - and our brains

From a speech to the Foundation for Science and Technology, in London, by the Astronomer Royal

Share
Related Topics

International physics Year, 2005, is focused on Einstein, because it marks the centenary of the annus mirabilis when he wrote his first four classic papers. In one respect the Einstein cult sends the wrong signal. It unduly exalts "armchair theory". In reality, 95 per cent of scientific progress stems from new technology and instruments. We need high-profile role models in those other fields.

International physics Year, 2005, is focused on Einstein, because it marks the centenary of the annus mirabilis when he wrote his first four classic papers. In one respect the Einstein cult sends the wrong signal. It unduly exalts "armchair theory". In reality, 95 per cent of scientific progress stems from new technology and instruments. We need high-profile role models in those other fields.

The bomb loomed over 20th century scientists. The science of the 21st century will bring far greater potential benefits than nuclear science--but equally grave ethical challenges and global threats. Science is changing the world faster than ever. Moreover, it is engendering extra dimensions of change. Within this century, targeted drugs, genetic modification, artificial intelligence, and perhaps silicon implants into the brain may change human beings themselves - that's something qualitatively new in our history.

We are all aware of the failures of scientists to predict the course of 20th-century technology. But I am deeply worried that, in our ever-more interconnected world, we're vulnerable to new kinds of risks - events of seemingly low probability, but of such catastrophic consequences that their avoidance should be high on the agenda.

Those discussing nuclear waste disposal talk with a straight face about what might happen in thousands of years. But the political planning horizon is seldom longer than 20 years . Even a millennium, however, is a mere instant in our planet's history. Cosmologists worry as much as anyone about tomorrow, next week and next year. But this enlarged perspective gives an extra motive to cherish our "pale blue dot" in the cosmos.

What happens in this uniquely decisive century will depend on new science, and on how wisely its use is channelled.

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Primary Teacher

Negotiable: Randstad Education Plymouth: Randstad Education Ltd are seeking EY...

Primary Teacher

Negotiable: Randstad Education Plymouth: NEWLY QUALIFIED TEACHER WE CAN HELP ...

Lead FE Software Developer (JavaScript, TDD, jQuery, Knockout)

£55000 - £65000 per annum + Benefits + Bonus: Harrington Starr: Lead FE Softwa...

Year 4 Teacher

Negotiable: Randstad Education Plymouth: Year 4 Primary Teachers needed for Se...

Day In a Page

A view over Rotherham  

The Only Way is Ethics: There are many dangers in a story as complex as the Rotherham child sex scandal

Will Gore
Alexander Fury: The designer names to look for at fashion week this season

The big names to look for this fashion week

This week, designers begin to show their spring 2015 collections in New York
Will Self: 'I like Orwell's writing as much as the next talented mediocrity'

'I like Orwell's writing as much as the next talented mediocrity'

Will Self takes aim at Orwell's rules for writing plain English
Meet Afghanistan's middle-class paint-ballers

Meet Afghanistan's middle-class paint-ballers

Toy guns proving a popular diversion in a country flooded with the real thing
Al Pacino wows Venice

Al Pacino wows Venice

Ham among the brilliance as actor premieres two films at festival
Neil Lawson Baker interview: ‘I’ve gained so much from art. It’s only right to give something back’.

Neil Lawson Baker interview

‘I’ve gained so much from art. It’s only right to give something back’.
The other Mugabe who is lining up for the Zimbabwean presidency

The other Mugabe who is lining up for the Zimbabwean presidency

Wife of President Robert Mugabe appears to have her sights set on succeeding her husband
The model of a gadget launch: Cultivate an atmosphere of mystery and excitement to sell stuff people didn't realise they needed

The model for a gadget launch

Cultivate an atmosphere of mystery and excitement to sell stuff people didn't realise they needed
Alice Roberts: She's done pretty well, for a boffin without a beard

She's done pretty well, for a boffin without a beard

Alice Roberts talks about her new book on evolution - and why her early TV work drew flak from (mostly male) colleagues
Get well soon, Joan Rivers - an inspiration, whether she likes it or not

Get well soon, Joan Rivers

She is awful. But she's also wonderful, not in spite of but because of the fact she's forever saying appalling things, argues Ellen E Jones
Doctor Who Into the Dalek review: A classic sci-fi adventure with all the spectacle of a blockbuster

A fresh take on an old foe

Doctor Who Into the Dalek more than compensated for last week's nonsensical offering
Fashion walks away from the celebrity runway show

Fashion walks away from the celebrity runway show

As the collections start, fashion editor Alexander Fury finds video and the internet are proving more attractive
Meet the stars of TV's Wolf Hall... and it's not the cast of the Tudor trilogy

Meet the stars of TV's Wolf Hall...

... and it's not the cast of the Tudor trilogy
Weekend at the Asylum: Europe's biggest steampunk convention heads to Lincoln

Europe's biggest steampunk convention

Jake Wallis Simons discovers how Victorian ray guns and the martial art of biscuit dunking are precisely what the 21st century needs
Don't swallow the tripe – a user's guide to weasel words

Don't swallow the tripe – a user's guide to weasel words

Lying is dangerous and unnecessary. A new book explains the strategies needed to avoid it. John Rentoul on the art of 'uncommunication'
Daddy, who was Richard Attenborough? Was the beloved thespian the last of the cross-generation stars?

Daddy, who was Richard Attenborough?

The atomisation of culture means that few of those we regard as stars are universally loved any more, says DJ Taylor