- Wednesday 22 May 2013
- My Account
- Logout
- Register
- Login
- News
-
Voices
-
Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Terence Blacker
- Chris Blackhurst
- David Blanchflower
- Archie Bland
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Laura Davis
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Stefano Hatfield
- Philip Hensher
- Ian Herbert
- Howard Jacobson
- Ellen E Jones
- Alice Jones
- Owen Jones
- Simon Kelner
- Dominic Lawson
- Donald Macintyre
- Lisa Markwell
- Comment
- Campaigns
- Debate
- Editorials
- Letters
- IV Drip
- Archive
- Our Voices
- Commentators
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
-
Find by writer
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts & Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Blogs
- Student
Wednesday 22 August 2012
Oliver Wright: In the Chancellor of the Exchequer we do not trust
There is only one thing deteriorating as fast as Britain's public finances – and that is the public faith in George Osborne's ability to deal with the problem.
A new poll yesterday showed that trust in the Chancellor is at an all-time low, with just 16 per cent of people believing that he is the right man to see the country out of the current economic woes.
They may well be right. Because the problem facing Mr Osborne is that he has staked his political reputation of rigidly sticking to what, even in 2010, was an ambitious deficit reduction plan.
Since then, the eurozone crisis and its choking effect on worldwide business confidence and growth has played havoc with all his assumptions for GDP, borrowing and public spending.
The latest figures yesterday show the economy is stalling, and badly needs a new plan. But politically, such a move is virtually impossible for Mr Osborne, because he has gambled his economic credibility on his strategy – which is deficit reduction above all else.
All he can do is search around for small measures to promote growth (which don't increase public borrowing) rather than embark upon the kind of massive fiscal stimulus that a growing number of economists now say is necessary to kick-start growth.
If Mr Osborne did change course now, Labour (and Ed Balls in particular) could destroy him. And that presents David Cameron with a problem: if the economy does not improve at some stage, the Prime Minister will have to decide whether to sacrifice his Chancellor for his Government.
A replacement to Mr Osborne would have greater political freedom to do what is economically necessary. True, Labour would still crow – but if it was done soon enough and was showing signs of working by May 2015, the electorate might be forgiving.
But that is still a remote possibility. Mr Cameron is loyal. He and Mr Osborne are still close and the decisions on deficit reduction were taken collectively.
It is more likely (and more depressing) that Mr Cameron may end up sacrificing economic growth to save his Chancellor.
-
Ed Miliband is staring at an open goal and I know just the pair of strikers to win it for him
Matthew Norman -
Austerity has hardened the nation's heart
Yasmin Alibhai Brown -
Brazilian woman auctions her virginity on site 'Virgins Wanted' - take part in our prostitution survey
Laura Davis -
After woman sells virginity for $780,000, here are the results of our prostitution survey
Laura Davis -
The Daily Cartoon
Get your summer started with British Military Fitness
BMF is the UK’s biggest and best loved outdoor fitness classes
Visit York
Find out what The Independent's resident travel expert has to say about one of the most beautiful small cities in the world
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Oliver Wright
Related Articles
Get the best in opinion from Independent Voices, straight to your inbox every Thursday lunchtime.
Subscribe
Amol Rajan
A weekly update from the Editor
Day In a Page
How to say ‘I’m a sellout’
Why clubs are keen to take a stand