The reality of modern celebrity

We've got to the point where it's possible to be a celebrity and dispense with the requirement that you need to be famous

Share

A recent piece of scientifically-conducted market research has thrown up some interesting facts about public attitudes towards contemporary fame. Oh, all right, I mean I phoned up six friends and asked them whether they'd heard of anyone appearing in this year's
I'm a Celebrity... Get Me Out of Here!

A recent piece of scientifically-conducted market research has thrown up some interesting facts about public attitudes towards contemporary fame. Oh, all right, I mean I phoned up six friends and asked them whether they'd heard of anyone appearing in this year's I'm a Celebrity... Get Me Out of Here!

Of the six, one told me promptly to go away and stop wasting his time. Taking the other five as the basis of the survey, 100 per cent immediately recognised the names of Janet Street-Porter ("Well, she writes for the same newspaper as you") and Paul Burrell ("He's that sweaty screaming butler"). Sixty per cent, surprisingly, thought they knew who Joe Pasquale was, although one respondent burst into a not obviously relevant rendering of The Birdy Song.

There was 20 per cent spontaneous recognition of the names of Natalie Appleton and Sheila Ferguson, rising to 60 per cent and 80 per cent respectively when prompted with the words "All Saints" and "The Three Degrees".

Of the others, nobody could offer any explanation of the existence of Fran Cosgrave, Antonio Fargas, Nancy Sorrell, Brian Harvey, or Sophie Anderton, and no clue, however detailed, could improve on the standing of any of those apart from the actor who used to play Huggy Bear in Starsky and Hutch. "Hmm, interesting," I said. "Yes, terribly," one respondent concluded. "Now get off the bleeding phone, I've got better things to do."

To most rational people of my age, I suspect, the bizarre thing about these findings is that they relate to a programme called I'm a Celebrity... One had always assumed that the defining fact of celebrity was that those in possession of it were famous. It was surreal enough when it became possible to be a celebrity without actually doing anything beyond being famous, like Paula Yates; now, we seem to have got to the point where it's perfectly possible to be a celebrity and dispense even with the requirement that you need to be famous first.

I notice the producers of this programme have issued the participants with jackets bearing their names in large letters; since neither their faces nor their names mean anything to anyone, this may be a necessity. Adding to the air of utter confusion, Brian Harvey and Fran Cosgrave, who you haven't heard of anyway, look exactly the same, as do Nancy Sorrell and Natalie Appleton, whoever they may be.

Someone like Fran Cosgrave now represents the contemporary nature of fame - you haven't heard of him, perhaps to the point that you were surprised, like me, to discover that he was a man. But, to elucidate, he is famous because he runs a nightclub, and has been out with a girl from Atomic Kitten called Natasha, who one can't remember, and another girl called Jodie Marsh who, as far as one can discover, has done nothing but walk almost naked through Leicester Square when there were photographers around.

Perhaps not too much weight should be placed on this. After all, about 15 people I know have been asked at some point to go on this programme. After a few more series, they will certainly have run out of all possibilities, and be reduced to people who once won The Weakest Link and the landlord of the Dog and Duck in Parsons Green.

But all the same, a certain shift has taken place in the whole concept of fame, which, it must be assumed, corresponds to a shift in the nature of ambition more generally. Although there have always been those famous for nothing very much, like the Rector of Stiffkey, previously, if you wanted to be famous, you did something; you achieved public recognition; your fame was tied to your work.

Now, no longer: and it is fair to say that, in the minds of many people, "celebrity" is merely a job, or category of existence, and it is so little tied to achievement or even to intrinsic fame that it is sometimes quite hard to remember what those who really are famous for something have actually done. I spent a good 10 minutes recently trying to remember why Victoria Beckham was famous in the first place.

All of which, naturally, brings us back to the Prince of Wales. His comments on modern ambition leaked out in such a peculiar way, and were so strangely expressed, that they were rather misunderstood. It was also predictable that, coming from such a source, most of the responses were on the level of "Well, what have you done to justify your position?", as if he shouldn't be allowed to comment on the position of anyone less fortunate than himself. Furthermore, he didn't do himself any favours by expressing these thoughts against what was surely a reasonable suggestion, that junior members of his household might, through merit, be considered for more senior jobs.

Nevertheless, patiently disentangled, his comments did have something of a point. What he was saying, it seems to me, was that many young people have a vague idea that they want to be famous without accepting that fame, even now, is not worth having unless it is connected to public achievement. Such public achievement is not, in the main, possible without the sort of hard work and dedication that few of those hungry for fame seem willing to attempt.

Doesn't he also have a case in suggesting that it is damaging and sad that so many young people, aiming for celebrity at all costs, regard the kind of useful and, indeed, rewarding careers their parents would have regarded as appropriate ambitions with contempt? How many of those sad cases who turn up on television talent shows saying that all they've ever dreamed of is a career singing or presenting children's television would actually make very good maths teachers or nurses? Isn't it worrying that so many people, inevitably failing in their fantastic dreams through lack of talent and lack of application, embark on a life they will always regard as second best?

The phenomenon is not, altogether, a new one, but it does seem extraordinarily widespread these days. Even at the infinitesimal level of celebrity of a newspaper columnist and novelist, I fairly often come across people who assure me that it's their dream to be a writer. In some cases, it turns out that they've never read a novel, don't read newspapers, and, if asked, can't write a grammatical or correctly-spelt sentence. The ambition, separated from any interest in the field they want to master, seems entirely impregnable, and any gentle scepticism, or encouragement to go away and do some work first, is met with the reassurance that "It's always been my dream." Whatever that means.

The awful thing is that fame itself is a horrible thing. It's worth having if it creates an audience for what you want to do or say, and even then the problems it creates can't be very pleasant. But what happens if there is no "what you want to do or say"? Why would you want to be famous, but not actually be able to do anything with that fame; to be recognised in supermarkets, to find false stories about yourself in newspapers, to know that people you will never meet will know the colour of your sitting room walls and have opinions about whether or not your marriage is likely to last?

Well, fortunately, the way things are going, that, too, will disappear. Because, based on current trends, celebrity soon will mean simply this; that like everyone else, your face and name are entirely obscure, and, in most cases of non-achievement and non-ambition, for very good reasons.

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Ashdown Group: Technical Presales Consultant - London - £65,000 OTE.

£65000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Technical Presales Engineer - central London ...

Recruitment Genius: Physiotherapist / Sports Therapist

£20000 - £50000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Physiotherapist / Sports Ther...

Recruitment Genius: Sales Executive / Advisor

£8 - £9 per hour: Recruitment Genius: Sales Executives / Advisors are required...

Recruitment Genius: Warehouse Operative

£14000 - £15000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An opportunity has arisen for a...

Day In a Page

Read Next
One 200ml bottle of codeine linctus contains three times the equivalent level of morphine you'd get in casualty if you broke your wrist  

The ‘war on drugs’ consistently ignores its greatest enemy: over-the-counter painkillers

Janet Street-Porter
The author contemplating what could have been  

I was a timid, kind, gentle-natured child, later to be spurned and humiliated – in short, the perfect terrorist-in-waiting

Howard Jacobson
Homeless Veterans campaign: Donations hit record-breaking £1m target after £300,000 gift from Lloyds Bank

Homeless Veterans campaign

Donations hit record-breaking £1m target after huge gift from Lloyds Bank
Flight MH370 a year on: Lost without a trace – but the search goes on

Lost without a trace

But, a year on, the search continues for Flight MH370
Germany's spymasters left red-faced after thieves break into brand new secret service HQ and steal taps

Germany's spy HQ springs a leak

Thieves break into new €1.5bn complex... to steal taps
International Women's Day 2015: Celebrating the whirlwind wit of Simone de Beauvoir

Whirlwind wit of Simone de Beauvoir

Simone de Beauvoir's seminal feminist polemic, 'The Second Sex', has been published in short-form for International Women's Day
Mark Zuckerberg’s hiring policy might suit him – but it wouldn’t work for me

Mark Zuckerberg’s hiring policy might suit him – but it wouldn’t work for me

Why would I want to employ someone I’d be happy to have as my boss, asks Simon Kelner
Confessions of a planespotter: With three Britons under arrest in the UAE, the perils have never been more apparent

Confessions of a planespotter

With three Britons under arrest in the UAE, the perils have never been more apparent. Sam Masters explains the appeal
Russia's gulag museum 'makes no mention' of Stalin's atrocities

Russia's gulag museum

Ministry of Culture-run site 'makes no mention' of Stalin's atrocities
The big fresh food con: Alarming truth behind the chocolate muffin that won't decay

The big fresh food con

Joanna Blythman reveals the alarming truth behind the chocolate muffin that won't decay
Virginia Ironside was my landlady: What is it like to live with an agony aunt on call 24/7?

Virginia Ironside was my landlady

Tim Willis reveals what it's like to live with an agony aunt on call 24/7
Paris Fashion Week 2015: The wit and wisdom of Manish Arora's exercise in high camp

Paris Fashion Week 2015

The wit and wisdom of Manish Arora's exercise in high camp
8 best workout DVDs

8 best workout DVDs

If your 'New Year new you' regime hasn’t lasted beyond February, why not try working out from home?
Paul Scholes column: I don't believe Jonny Evans was spitting at Papiss Cissé. It was a reflex. But what the Newcastle striker did next was horrible

Paul Scholes column

I don't believe Evans was spitting at Cissé. It was a reflex. But what the Newcastle striker did next was horrible
Miguel Layun interview: From the Azteca to Vicarage Road with a million followers

From the Azteca to Vicarage Road with a million followers

Miguel Layun is a star in Mexico where he was criticised for leaving to join Watford. But he says he sees the bigger picture
Frank Warren column: Amir Khan ready to meet winner of Floyd Mayweather v Manny Pacquiao

Khan ready to meet winner of Mayweather v Pacquiao

The Bolton fighter is unlikely to take on Kell Brook with two superstar opponents on the horizon, says Frank Warren
War with Isis: Iraq's government fights to win back Tikrit from militants - but then what?

Baghdad fights to win back Tikrit from Isis – but then what?

Patrick Cockburn reports from Kirkuk on a conflict which sectarianism has made intractable