- Thursday 23 May 2013
- My Account
- Logout
- Register
- Login
- News
-
Voices
-
Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Terence Blacker
- Chris Blackhurst
- David Blanchflower
- Archie Bland
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Laura Davis
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Stefano Hatfield
- Philip Hensher
- Ian Herbert
- Howard Jacobson
- Ellen E Jones
- Alice Jones
- Owen Jones
- Simon Kelner
- Dominic Lawson
- Donald Macintyre
- Lisa Markwell
- Comment
- Campaigns
- Debate
- Editorials
- Letters
- IV Drip
- Archive
- Our Voices
- Commentators
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
-
Find by writer
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts & Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Blogs
- Student
Thursday 22 November 2007
Richard Thomas: Individuals value their privacy - institutions do not
Privacy matters now more than ever. Research by my office – the Information Commissioner's Office – published earlier this month highlighted that nine out of 10 people are concerned that organisations do not treat their personal information properly. People also rank protecting personal information as the second most important social issue – perhaps surprisingly ahead of the environment and the NHS.
Incidents such as the security breach at HM Revenue and Customs reinforce the importance and necessity of data protection – or people protection as I prefer to call it. The Data Protection Act sets out the framework for how organisations should process and manage personal information – follow the principles of the Data Protection Act and you will retain the trust and confidence of the public. Allow personal information to leave secure buildings and get lost in the post and the public will rightly want an explanation.
For some time I have been pressing the Government to give my office stronger powers under the Act to audit and inspect organisations that process people's personal information without first having to get their consent. Ultimately this will ensure better compliance with the law and protect people's data. The Prime Minister announced yesterday that my staff will be able to spot-check government departments. We will work with the Ministry of Justice to confirm the detail on this – what we need are full audit and inspection powers, and not just for government departments, but for every organisation, public and private, that processes people's personal information. It is essential that we are properly resourced to carry out this new function.
It is also important that the law is changed to make significant security breaches – where they are reckless or repeated – a criminal offence. At the moment I can take limited enforcement action, but making deliberate and systematic data breaches a criminal offence would serve as a strong deterrent and would send a very strong signal that it is completely unacceptable to be cavalier with people's personal information. Committing a criminal offence is a strong deterrent and means that more organisations will comply with the law. The Data Protection Act needs to be changed urgently so that people's personal details are properly protected.
High standards of security and records management are essential if companies and public authorities are to retain the trust and confidence of those who use their services. While the majority of organisations process personal information appropriately it is imperative that all organisations, large and small, take the protection of individuals' information more seriously.
Our research shows that individuals are now more aware of their rights under the Data Protection Act than ever before. Individuals value their personal information so careless and inexcusable breaches of their personal details are clearly unacceptable. Earlier this year, I highlighted a horrifying roll call of organisations which have admitted serious security lapses and I called for every organisation to take privacy far more seriously. Alarm bells must now ring in every boardroom. Data protection safeguards must be technically robust and idiot proof. Protecting the public's personal information will no doubt become a more significant priority.
Richard Thomas is the Information Commissioner; ico.gov.uk
-
Grace Dent: I’m not sure how these people can avoid being called ‘bigots’. And the more ‘civilised’, the worse they are
Grace Dent -
After woman sells virginity for $780,000, here are the results of our prostitution survey
Laura Davis -
The Daily Cartoon
-
Woolwich murder: They killed, then they performed - these men should be starved of our attention
Frank Furedi -
Woolwich attack: The EDL will seek to exploit this evil crime for their own evil ends
Jamie Lewis
-
Woolwich murder: They killed, then they performed - these men should be starved of our attention
-
Embrace the e-book, Stephen King. It is not for an author to tell his readers how to read
-
Woolwich attack: We have a duty to report these images, but editors face difficult ethical questions
-
Editorial: What can be done on corporate tax?
Get your summer started with British Military Fitness
BMF is the UK’s biggest and best loved outdoor fitness classes
Visit York
Find out what The Independent's resident travel expert has to say about one of the most beautiful small cities in the world
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Get the best in opinion from Independent Voices, straight to your inbox every Thursday lunchtime.
Subscribe
Amol Rajan
A weekly update from the Editor
Day In a Page
Edward VIII’s phone calls - and how MI5 bugged them
Hollywood's random acts of red-carpet kindness
Not secure any more: G4S boss heads for exit at last
How to say ‘I’m a sellout’