Robert Rowland Smith: How universities lost their innocence

The taint of Libyan money has shaken the reputation of the LSE, but that's the price of making education a commodity

Related Topics

The resignation of Howard Davies from his post as director of the London School of Economics reignites the ever flammable question of the relationship between university and money. We might find it distasteful to discover financial links between the LSE, one of the country's premier education brands, and Libya, especially at a time when the Libyan brand itself seems even less shiny than usual.

But for years our politicians have been pressing universities to find alternative sources of funding. As for the public, and the tax it is willing to pay on education, universities languish well down the list from schools. So let us not indulge in too much moral outrage on hearing about universities striking deals with the international rich. Of course, there are degrees to which one can be compromised, from the sensible to the satanic, but Davies resigned citing reputational risk to LSE, not moral turpitude.

Despite and because of the marketisation of universities, there is a view tenaciously held, and not just by academics, that higher education should remain untouched by any money with strings attached. Investors have a way of distorting a university's purpose, which is the disinterested pursuit of research. What's more, that research should be excused from meeting any target, not because academics are lazy, but because research is, by definition, a process of finding out, in which the goal cannot be defined in advance. Indeed, so unfettered should university researchers be that if, say, they write critiques of the very government that channels public funds towards them, so be it. Universities have a role as grit in the nation's oyster.

That is one end of the spectrum. Its fatal flaw is easy to spot: publicly funded universities also have shareholders, namely the public, who deserve a return. Gone are the days when few enough students went to university that the public did not really worry about the fact that they were subsidising them; they might not even have known this was the case. Now gazillions of teenagers pack up hatchbacks for freshers' week, and it is this sheer rise in volume that sends us towards the spectrum's other end.

With very few exceptions, today's universities are not primarily research institutions: they're teaching colleges with add-on research functions also designed to attract money. The reasons for this shift are political. Universities were perceived to be elitist, so they had to be both expanded and opened up. Clearly the economics had to adapt. What emerged was a "sweat the assets" model: larger classes, lecturers doing admin, fewer contact hours. This model was more or less sustainable, depending on your feelings about quality. Not just quality of teaching – clearly staff-student ratios had an impact on that – but quality of students. You cannot send that many kids to university and expect them all to be eggheads. It would not be an overstatement to say that some could barely write. Still, they were funded by the state, and the economy was doing well enough to get most of them jobs, so the financial loop could be satisfactorily closed.

It also meant that universities didn't have to listen terribly hard when politicians started warning them to wean themselves off public cash and diversify their income. The few that did, including the LSE, were thus getting ahead of the game. Once you're told to go out to the market, however, you are in open country. It is a fact of the market that money sources will be varied and come with varying degrees of cleanliness.

And that is the case, just with the last person you did a deal with. Like drinking water, money goes through lots of cycles of purity and dirt. By the time you consume it, it's passed through God knows how many systems. Not only that, as the cliché has it – markets know no boundaries. Once universities entered the game, they did so internationally.

What was remarkable was how highly valued British universities were when they arrived. It is a fact still little recognised within Britain that "a British education" is among the most desirable international goods we produce.

Soon British universities had campuses in the Far East, and legions of Asian students were taking degrees, especially science degrees, in the UK. Lecturers might have gone on deploring it, but it was blessed by politicians and university apparatchiks alike, not least because, based on that brand value, you could charge the foreigners more.

So, in many respects, Libya was merely another market where "a British education" could be sold. What made it different, apparently, is that the funding came not only from students buying degrees – fair enough in an international market – but from high-rolling patrons, including those in the Gaddafi family. This classed it with other donors – not just Arab – to other British universities.

Let us set aside the whole question of Britain's complicity with regimes it strategically disowns, or those it has armed and then condemned, and so on. The point is that, irrevocably, higher education has become a business. A British degree buys you earning power pretty much anywhere in the world. That there is some learning involved is nice, but it is evanescent and it is secondary. As Howard Davies himself said, the mistake he made was reputational, not substantive.

In many ways, education in this country is like cricket. We have a highly sentimental attachment to both. We sort of invented them, and sort of think they are good in themselves. Meanwhile, both have been thrown to the dogs of the market, and there is no going back.

The LSE story is really one about innocence and experience. The British love to think of themselves as innocent, and education is its main symbol. Even Davies's resignation can be read as a last-ditch attempt to save some innocence, rather than appearing like the calculating market-monger he was in danger of becoming. The truth is that we were always a bit guilty.

Robert Rowland Smith is the author of 'Driving with Plato' (Profile)

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Austen Lloyd: Employment Solicitor

£30000 - £60000 per annum + Excellent: Austen Lloyd: Employment Solicitor - Ke...

Argyll Scott International: Risk Assurance Manager

Negotiable: Argyll Scott International: Hi All, I'm currently recruiting for t...

Austen Lloyd: Clinical Negligence Solicitor

Highly Competitive Salary: Austen Lloyd: HAMPSHIRE MARKET TOWN - A highly attr...

Ashdown Group: IT Systems Analyst / Application Support Engineer (ERP / SSRS)

£23000 - £30000 per annum + pension, 25days holiday: Ashdown Group: An industr...

Day In a Page

Read Next
Bill Cosby speaks onstage at the Thurgood Marshall College Fund 25th Awards Gala on 11 November 2013 in Washington  

Bill Cosby: Isn’t it obvious why his accusers have stayed silent up until now?

Grace Dent

Our political landscape is not changing anywhere near as much as we assume it is

Steve Richards
How bad do you have to be to lose a Home Office contract?

How bad do you have to be to lose a Home Office contract?

Serco given Yarl’s Wood immigration contract despite ‘vast failings’
Green Party on the march in Bristol: From a lost deposit to victory

From a lost deposit to victory

Green Party on the march in Bristol
Putting the grot right into Santa's grotto

Winter blunderlands

Putting the grot into grotto
'It just came to us, why not do it naked?' London's first nude free runner captured in breathtaking images across capital

'It just came to us, why not do it naked?'

London's first nude free runner captured in breathtaking images across capital
In a world of Saudi bullying, right-wing Israeli ministers and the twilight of Obama, Iran is looking like a possible policeman of the Gulf

Iran is shifting from pariah to possible future policeman of the Gulf

Robert Fisk on our crisis with Iran
The young are the new poor: A third of young people pushed into poverty

The young are the new poor

Sharp increase in the number of under-25s living in poverty
Greens on the march: ‘We could be on the edge of something very big’

Greens on the march

‘We could be on the edge of something very big’
Revealed: the case against Bill Cosby - through the stories of his accusers

Revealed: the case against Bill Cosby

Through the stories of his accusers
Why are words like 'mongol' and 'mongoloid' still bandied about as insults?

The Meaning of Mongol

Why are the words 'mongol' and 'mongoloid' still bandied about as insults?
Mau Mau uprising: Kenyans still waiting for justice join class action over Britain's role in the emergency

Kenyans still waiting for justice over Mau Mau uprising

Thousands join class action over Britain's role in the emergency
Isis in Iraq: The trauma of the last six months has overwhelmed the remaining Christians in the country

The last Christians in Iraq

After 2,000 years, a community will try anything – including pretending to convert to Islam – to avoid losing everything, says Patrick Cockburn
Black Friday: Helpful discounts for Christmas shoppers, or cynical marketing by desperate retailers?

Helpful discounts for Christmas shoppers, or cynical marketing by desperate retailers?

Britain braced for Black Friday
Bill Cosby's persona goes from America's dad to date-rape drugs

From America's dad to date-rape drugs

Stories of Bill Cosby's alleged sexual assaults may have circulated widely in Hollywood, but they came as a shock to fans, says Rupert Cornwell
Clare Balding: 'Women's sport is kicking off at last'

Clare Balding: 'Women's sport is kicking off at last'

As fans flock to see England women's Wembley debut against Germany, the TV presenter on an exciting 'sea change'